cushionhiddenhalo
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2021
- Messages
- 12
Hi PSers, I’m comparing two round brilliant cuts with the following specs, would appreciate your views on which would be a better choice:
Stone 1. 1.69 carat E VVS2 (7.69 x 7.74 x 4.64) HCA 0.8 - depth 60.1%, table 58%, crown 33’ 13.5%, pavilion 40.8’ 43%, star 50%, lower half 75%, girdle medium-slightly thick 3.5% - great spread but I’m just concerned whether this would appear dark / lack brilliance? might mention this is medium fluorescence which doesn’t affect the diamond’s clarity, and also doesn’t bother me.
Stone 2. 1.7 carat E VS1 (7.63 x 7.57 x 4.72) HCA 1.2 - depth 62.1%, table 57%, crown 35.5’ 15.5%, pavilion 40.6’ 43%, star 50%, lower half 80%, girdle medium-slightly thick 4.0% - average spread but I don’t need it looking any larger.
thanks in advance!!
Stone 1. 1.69 carat E VVS2 (7.69 x 7.74 x 4.64) HCA 0.8 - depth 60.1%, table 58%, crown 33’ 13.5%, pavilion 40.8’ 43%, star 50%, lower half 75%, girdle medium-slightly thick 3.5% - great spread but I’m just concerned whether this would appear dark / lack brilliance? might mention this is medium fluorescence which doesn’t affect the diamond’s clarity, and also doesn’t bother me.
Stone 2. 1.7 carat E VS1 (7.63 x 7.57 x 4.72) HCA 1.2 - depth 62.1%, table 57%, crown 35.5’ 15.5%, pavilion 40.6’ 43%, star 50%, lower half 80%, girdle medium-slightly thick 4.0% - average spread but I don’t need it looking any larger.
thanks in advance!!