- Joined
- Dec 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,883
We originally acquired at auction a 5.00ct Ceylon sapphire in a Tsavorite and diamond setting.
It looked great in bright direct light, but darkened up a lot out of direct light. DW suspected the setting wasn't doing the sapphire any favors by blocking all light entry below the girdle.
DW decided we should take it to David and Amy at DKJ and get their advice. They too thought a more open setting might improve performance, and they kindly unset the stone for us.
I wondered if the stone might benefit from a recut, but looking thru his loupe David found so much going on under the table, he thought it best to leave the stone well alone. Just to confirm, Amy took us to see two other sapphire experts, and they too agreed it would be best not to touch the stone for fear of hitting an inclusion or feather below the surface of the table.
We were in the middle of another project with Amy so DW decided to take the sapphire home with us whilst she looked for a new setting inspiration. Anyway to cut a long story short we ended up asking Jerry Newman if he thought it might be feasible, at our risk, to recut the pavilion only of our stone. The idea being to leave the crown completely alone and keep the original face up size. It was pretty clear the ultra wonky native pavilion cut on our stone wasn't put there for beauty, but rather to hit the 5.00ct mark. To cut the story even shorter Jerry did successfully recut the pavilion, and to DW's delight the sapphire did brighten up considerably all the way around the crown and to a lesser extent on the table. Jerry wasn't able to predict how much weight we might loose on the recut, and we were very relieved when the sapphire came in at 4.20ct. Stupidly I didn't take any photos after the recut, but the pavilion cut was based on an OEC diamond.
DW had decided she wanted to go with a Princess Diana style setting with this photo as her inspiration.
DW was leaning towards white gold and when we visited with Amy to drop off the sapphire she asked Amy if she could see the stone next to a diamond ring in white gold. Amy went to the safe and pulled out their tray of settings, she was looking for a ring of suitable size when she came across this one.
Apparently the setting had originally been home to a large marquise diamond that was badly chipped and had to undergo a major recut. The setting was almost exactly the right width for our sapphire but obviously N/S was a problem. After some thought Amy said they might be able to adjust the setting to fit our stone. The setting would likely cost a little more than a Princess Diana, but DW could make her decision whilst DKJ figured out how to adjust the setting to fit our stone. DKJ are not well known for wasting words and the next we heard from them was this photo David sent us
So do you think DW decided to go with a Princess Diana or Marquise Heaven? More later.
It looked great in bright direct light, but darkened up a lot out of direct light. DW suspected the setting wasn't doing the sapphire any favors by blocking all light entry below the girdle.
DW decided we should take it to David and Amy at DKJ and get their advice. They too thought a more open setting might improve performance, and they kindly unset the stone for us.
I wondered if the stone might benefit from a recut, but looking thru his loupe David found so much going on under the table, he thought it best to leave the stone well alone. Just to confirm, Amy took us to see two other sapphire experts, and they too agreed it would be best not to touch the stone for fear of hitting an inclusion or feather below the surface of the table.
We were in the middle of another project with Amy so DW decided to take the sapphire home with us whilst she looked for a new setting inspiration. Anyway to cut a long story short we ended up asking Jerry Newman if he thought it might be feasible, at our risk, to recut the pavilion only of our stone. The idea being to leave the crown completely alone and keep the original face up size. It was pretty clear the ultra wonky native pavilion cut on our stone wasn't put there for beauty, but rather to hit the 5.00ct mark. To cut the story even shorter Jerry did successfully recut the pavilion, and to DW's delight the sapphire did brighten up considerably all the way around the crown and to a lesser extent on the table. Jerry wasn't able to predict how much weight we might loose on the recut, and we were very relieved when the sapphire came in at 4.20ct. Stupidly I didn't take any photos after the recut, but the pavilion cut was based on an OEC diamond.
DW had decided she wanted to go with a Princess Diana style setting with this photo as her inspiration.
DW was leaning towards white gold and when we visited with Amy to drop off the sapphire she asked Amy if she could see the stone next to a diamond ring in white gold. Amy went to the safe and pulled out their tray of settings, she was looking for a ring of suitable size when she came across this one.
Apparently the setting had originally been home to a large marquise diamond that was badly chipped and had to undergo a major recut. The setting was almost exactly the right width for our sapphire but obviously N/S was a problem. After some thought Amy said they might be able to adjust the setting to fit our stone. The setting would likely cost a little more than a Princess Diana, but DW could make her decision whilst DKJ figured out how to adjust the setting to fit our stone. DKJ are not well known for wasting words and the next we heard from them was this photo David sent us
So do you think DW decided to go with a Princess Diana or Marquise Heaven? More later.
Last edited: