I have always used a cheap little UV penlight that I got from Esslinger whenever I want to check for fluorescence in a colored stone. But I started reading a bit more and learned that the cheap ones are mostly ~ 395nm with tons of spillover into visible (violet) light. That's what mine was -- looked like a tiny, old-school "blacklight." There are much better ones that are mostly 365nm with a cutoff filter that eliminates almost all visible light. (Note that both 365nm and 395nm are "long wave" UV and the only thing I was interested in.)
So, based on lots of positive reviews on Amazon -- mostly from the dog urine, coolant leak, and yooperite crowd (!) -- I got the LIGHTFE UV301D. It uses a disposable AA battery although for a few bucks more there is the UV301A model powered by a rechargeable lithium battery. It was $31 but after letting it marinate in my cart for a while, I got a discount coupon so it was $28. It's tiny but feels well made with a machined aluminum case and push-button rubberized on/off on the back end.
Here it is next to my old standby and a quarter for scale:
It is amazingly bright. Practically zero visible light but the fluorescence off a piece of plain white paper in a dark room is almost blinding.
As a test case, here is a pendant that we got from Inken a while back -- a vivid unheated 2-ct-ish pink sapphire in a handmade platinum mounting. Excluding the bale, it's maybe 5/8" or ~ 15mm top to bottom. (And my wife absolutely loves it -- can't omit that fact -- my blah ambient-ceiling-light photos below showcase the center stone adequately but do not do justice to the "bling" factor of the double row of melee!)
All the following photos undersell the fluorescence with either of the UV lights although they are completely representative of the differences that the eye "sees." They were all shot in RAW with minimal post-processing (plus white-balance correction on the ambient-light ones) on a delayed shutter release at high ISO with a tripod-mounted macro lens and full-frame DSLR body.
Under ambient light:
With my trusty old UV penlight:
With the LIGHTFE UV301D:
Just so amazing to see the sapphire light up like a pink/red LED only 10X brighter -- and the cool and varied fluor in the diamond melee with the various blues and even an orange and a green. The tiny red "specks" must be secondary reflections of the bright red off the front surface of the lens "filter" and then off the shiny metal. Even the lint on the faux suede pouch behind the pendant lights up.
Here is another series where I tried to better capture the varied fluor in the melee between the the 6:00 and 9:00 positions:
Under ambient light:
With my trusty old UV penlight:
With the LIGHTFE UV301D:
I am just blown away by the difference!
On the downside, though, I did learn that the "is-it-or-isn't it...?" slightly discolored patch on the carpet definitely is -- and that our never-had-an-accident pup has officially outlived his reputation...
So, based on lots of positive reviews on Amazon -- mostly from the dog urine, coolant leak, and yooperite crowd (!) -- I got the LIGHTFE UV301D. It uses a disposable AA battery although for a few bucks more there is the UV301A model powered by a rechargeable lithium battery. It was $31 but after letting it marinate in my cart for a while, I got a discount coupon so it was $28. It's tiny but feels well made with a machined aluminum case and push-button rubberized on/off on the back end.
Here it is next to my old standby and a quarter for scale:
It is amazingly bright. Practically zero visible light but the fluorescence off a piece of plain white paper in a dark room is almost blinding.
As a test case, here is a pendant that we got from Inken a while back -- a vivid unheated 2-ct-ish pink sapphire in a handmade platinum mounting. Excluding the bale, it's maybe 5/8" or ~ 15mm top to bottom. (And my wife absolutely loves it -- can't omit that fact -- my blah ambient-ceiling-light photos below showcase the center stone adequately but do not do justice to the "bling" factor of the double row of melee!)
All the following photos undersell the fluorescence with either of the UV lights although they are completely representative of the differences that the eye "sees." They were all shot in RAW with minimal post-processing (plus white-balance correction on the ambient-light ones) on a delayed shutter release at high ISO with a tripod-mounted macro lens and full-frame DSLR body.
Under ambient light:
With my trusty old UV penlight:
With the LIGHTFE UV301D:
Just so amazing to see the sapphire light up like a pink/red LED only 10X brighter -- and the cool and varied fluor in the diamond melee with the various blues and even an orange and a green. The tiny red "specks" must be secondary reflections of the bright red off the front surface of the lens "filter" and then off the shiny metal. Even the lint on the faux suede pouch behind the pendant lights up.
Here is another series where I tried to better capture the varied fluor in the melee between the the 6:00 and 9:00 positions:
Under ambient light:
With my trusty old UV penlight:
With the LIGHTFE UV301D:
I am just blown away by the difference!
On the downside, though, I did learn that the "is-it-or-isn't it...?" slightly discolored patch on the carpet definitely is -- and that our never-had-an-accident pup has officially outlived his reputation...