shape
carat
color
clarity

Advice on this Emerald ASET?

Significant_Garden

Rough_Rock
Joined
Sep 10, 2023
Messages
8
Hello,

I recently ordered this diamond but they sent me the ASET after ordering and I'm starting to have some doubts.
Any input would be helpful!



unnamed.jpg
 
@Karl_K What say you?

I personally think it looks decent. I would need to see it in person to make sure the "dark" facets are lighting up as it moves
and not showing leakage. Karl will be able to glean more from the aset.
 
Has it shipped?
The center looks very dark in the video and ASET says it also may be an issue.
 
table size? depth?
Is there a plot on the report?
Florescence?

I'm having issues obtaining the plot but they said the depth is 67 and the table size at 69 with no florescence. I am also looking at a few others, would you mind taking a look at them? I trust your opinions a lot more than the "gemologists" they have on these websites.

1.

Video:

2.

Video:

3.

4.
 
Last edited:
69 table is out.
Look for a table 65 and under.
1: - no - large dark zones and huge table
2: no huge table and blech
3: no, sample image, huge table
4: no, sample image, huge table
 
69 table is out.
Look for a table 65 and under.
1: - no - large dark zones and huge table
2: no huge table and blech
3: no, sample image, huge table
4: no, sample image, huge table

Having table 65 and under definitely eliminated a lot of diamonds, is there a depth I should aim for too? Thank you again for your input
 
Having table 65 and under definitely eliminated a lot of diamonds, is there a depth I should aim for too? Thank you again for your input
Depth I try and keep under 67 in an EC unless it has very high crown height. Its flexible for the right stone as is table a bit say 66 table with everything else right.
Depth does not always equal spread so you have to pay attention to the mm also.
 
Depth I try and keep under 67 in an EC unless it has very high crown height. Its flexible for the right stone as is table a bit say 66 table with everything else right.
Depth does not always equal spread so you have to pay attention to the mm also.
I am starting to think that there may be something conflicting about what I am looking for since the websites are barely showing me any diamonds that match the criteria. More specifically I am trying to reach 8 mm in length while staying under 1.6 ct, is this achievable?

What do you think of these:

1.

Video:

2.

3.

4.
 
Last edited:
#3 try and get a better video and ASET and put it on hold.
It is very intriguing but not enough data to call it.
The other 2 are not what you want.
 
Last edited:
#3 in the last batch. See if you can get an ASET.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top