Cind11
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
- Messages
- 1,959
On July 15-16, my DH and I went to the Ann Arbor art fair. There were something like 1200-1800 artists there. Different artists told me different numbers. There were MANY jewelers/artists. I can''t even hazard a guess how many. What struck me is that I saw one prong set ring the entire time I was there. In the two days we hit every artist there. All the rings, pendants etc. I saw were bezeled or flush mounted. I thought this was interesting because on PS it seems the majority of the jewery we see is prong set. The settings these artists had were really lovely. There were a lot of interesting color combinations. I saw a LOT of tourmalines. There was also aquamarine, opals, tanzanite, zircon, topaz, zircon, ametyst, citrine and peridot. I saw rhodolite garnet but very few spessartites and I think maybe one small tsavorite. I saw some sapphires too but not many. I''m guessing there weren''t many really expensive stones because the settings were expensive in and of themselves so adding a quite expensive stone would make the piece not cost effective to sell. I have to say I found the settings to be very fluid and elegant and much preferred them to prong set pieces. I say this even though I have some prong set rings and do like them. I just thought the bezel set and flush mounted rings were nicer and made for a more attractive piece. I do wonder why most of the rings we see are prong set. I think it is interesting how James Meyer talks on his website about prongs being a recent invention allowing jewelry to be mass produced.
So, tell me why you prefer one to the other and why. I guess I am curious.
So, tell me why you prefer one to the other and why. I guess I am curious.