LoversKites
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2013
- Messages
- 1,733
Marlow|1428990423|3861575 said:Is this a simple question???
You mean you have a lets say paleblue sapphire with long and thin unmelted rutile needles - no diffusion treatment course they would melt.
But if you put ice in a hot pan it depends on the size of the ice cube and how long it is in the pan.
Some rutile crystal are melted but you need maybe more then 10x to see that it is a line of melted "drops".
A microscope is a very helpful tool.
Another question are star sapphire with diffusion...
Not enough time now - later!
Marlow|1428990423|3861575 said:Is this a simple question???
You mean you have a lets say paleblue sapphire with long and thin unmelted rutile needles - no diffusion treatment course they would melt.
But if you put ice in a hot pan it depends on the size of the ice cube and how long it is in the pan.
Some rutile crystal are melted but you need maybe more then 10x to see that it is a line of melted "drops".
A microscope is a very helpful tool.
Another question are star sapphire with diffusion...
Not enough time now - later!
minousbijoux|1428990891|3861576 said:Right. Now for the simple answer (assuming it is a tiny ice cube in a BIG pan of BOILING hot water in there for a LONG time, lol): No! There will not be intact rutile if it has been diffused.
I like this system: the rest of us will answer the simple questions, and we'll let Marlow come in with the full equivocation and all the caveats for the not-so-simple question!
Marlow said:http://www.gemresearch.ch/news/2011-12-19_Alert/Alert.htm
Look at the blue rim around the melted neg. cristal!!
Negative cristal in a corundum are in my opinion more important than some solid cristals - a clear SHARP neg. cristal is an evidence for low heat only - higher heat an they look frosted and opak
Chrono|1429011484|3861622 said:I am very sure that surface diffusion leaves many rutile inclusions intact (cat's eye and star corundum).