- Joined
- Feb 29, 2012
- Messages
- 12,331
There is such a thing, right?
I'm still going back and forth about my 1.52 asscher and what to do with it. It is a beautiful stone, and I love it so much, but the size deficiency really bothers me. I made a post on rocky talky. I go back and forth a lot (it is set in 4 prong solitare), and the last thing I decided was not to upgrade (would need to spend 12k) and just get another ring, an OEC around 2 carats. Two rings are better than one, amirite?
I also thought of adding side stones a la Leon Mege.
I'm not really into halos, but that may very well end up as my solution here. I feel very strongly I want no bezel. (I do like bezels but don't want this stone in a bezel).
So I am putting a call out for halo asschers.
The octagon halos are bezels, is thar correct? I seem to be a little confused between the two.
Thanks for any help. This is very much not a pressing issue.
I'm still going back and forth about my 1.52 asscher and what to do with it. It is a beautiful stone, and I love it so much, but the size deficiency really bothers me. I made a post on rocky talky. I go back and forth a lot (it is set in 4 prong solitare), and the last thing I decided was not to upgrade (would need to spend 12k) and just get another ring, an OEC around 2 carats. Two rings are better than one, amirite?
I also thought of adding side stones a la Leon Mege.
I'm not really into halos, but that may very well end up as my solution here. I feel very strongly I want no bezel. (I do like bezels but don't want this stone in a bezel).
So I am putting a call out for halo asschers.
The octagon halos are bezels, is thar correct? I seem to be a little confused between the two.
Thanks for any help. This is very much not a pressing issue.