shape
carat
color
clarity

Celebrity Interest/Obsession: Why?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

KimberlyH

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jun 15, 2006
Messages
7,485
I am really curious as to why anyone finds the lives of celebrities, as displayed to the public through the slanted eyes of the media, PR people, etc,, interesting enough to spend time discussing, either on a discussion board or in real life. Care to share why you are interested, if, in fact, you are? And if you''re not, why do you think you just don''t care?
 
I dont know nothing else to do I guess. Personally I refuse to buy rag mags but I do visit PH, TMZ etc. It not automatically a bad thing for celebs to be talked about, they need it.
 
I have almost no interest in it whatsoever. I think of it this way: I don''t really spend all that much time wondering about, discussing, or obsessing over the lives of my friends, family, and neighbors, so why would I care about what are essentially just other, random people?

Sure, they''re famous. Yes, they have more money than I or anyone else I am likely to know will ever have. Yes, I suppose they do ridiculous things sometimes. I just fail to see why those things mean that I should care more about them than I would about someone else. Got arrested? Oh well. Wore baggy clothes? Media field day! Pregnant? Fat? I honestly just don''t care that much. I think it''s a teensy bit invasive to learn the details of someone else''s life, and I certainly have more interesting things to think and talk about.

Hopefully I didn''t offend anyone in saying any of that! It just fascinates me how much people get "into" learning [read: stalking] about the minute details of famous peoples'' lives. I don''t get it!
 
Date: 7/26/2008 10:39:42 PM
Author: VegasAngel
I dont know nothing else to do I guess. Personally I refuse to buy rag mags but I do visit PH, TMZ etc. It not automatically a bad thing for celebs to be talked about, they need it.
I didn't claim it's "automatically a bad thing" but I would state that it's quite possible to have lucrative career as an actor, musician, etc. without having your every move put on public display and analyzed by the masses (off the top of my head Morgan Freeman, Bono, James Earle Jones, Pete Townshend, are all talented, famous people, and there are tons more, who manage to keep their personal lives personal and still have amazingly sucessful careers).

ETA: I am truly curious as to why people find this stuff interesting. DH buys me mags on occasion when we're traveling, to keep me occupied on the plane, and I flip through them but I don't know who most of the people are so I don't find them very interesting (and I'm unsure why he thinks I would as he knows I'm not a big TV/movie person and while I love music, I'm not too interested in the lives of pop performers). Lots of people are watching E! and reading these publications and I am trying to understand why people find it all so fascinating. I don't think it's bad, or wrong, I just don't understand it.
 
There is nothing to defend it isnt that serious. Sure there are celebs who arent surrounded by constant press & manage to stay under the radar. They all at some point use the media to their advantage to promote whatever project they have going on.

For me like I said it's just something to do.
 
Date: 7/26/2008 11:05:17 PM
Author: VegasAngel
There is nothing to defend it isnt that serious. Sure there are celebs who arent surrounded by constant press & manage to stay under the radar. They all at some point use the media to their advantage to promote whatever project they have going on.
There''s a difference between promoting a project and having your personal life examined though. Or isn''t there? Is it just part of the deal of being a celebrity now?

And in some cases I would venture to say it is serious. There must be some effect on Madonna''s daughter to see it smeared all over the news that her mom is cheating on her stepdad, just as it would be traumatic, in the future, to be Britney Spears sons and be able to watch youtube and see your mom hauled off in an ambulance after locking you in the bathroom with her for several hours. And there are countless other stories like these, which are almost unavoidable because as someone who doesn''t seek out this information I am still somewhat in the know regarding celebrity gossip.
 
Date: 7/26/2008 11:11:53 PM
Author: KimberlyH
Date: 7/26/2008 11:05:17 PM

Author: VegasAngel

There is nothing to defend it isnt that serious. Sure there are celebs who arent surrounded by constant press & manage to stay under the radar. They all at some point use the media to their advantage to promote whatever project they have going on.
There''s a difference between promoting a project and having your personal life examined though. Or isn''t there? Is it just part of the deal of being a celebrity now?


And in some cases I would venture to say it is serious. There must be some effect on Madonna''s daughter to see it smeared all over the news that her mom is cheating on her stepdad, just as it would be traumatic, in the future, to be Britney Spears sons and be able to watch youtube and see your mom hauled off in an ambulance after locking you in the bathroom with her for several hours. And there are countless other stories like these, which are almost unavoidable because as someone who doesn''t seek out this information I am still somewhat in the know regarding celebrity gossip.
I agree with this.

I read magazines talking about new projects that music artists are embarking on, even their inspiration for their music, or something like that. I am not that into mainstream TV or movies, so I don''t read much about that. I think that promoting your work [or having it promoted] or being famous int hat way that people who are famous tend to be--well known, know some things about their life off-hand, is very different from knowing what some celebrity ate for breakfast, their shoe/pant/bra size, their scale reading, their romantic relationships, and every bit of tragedy that they come across. Some of it is simply depressing and exploitative.
 
It comes with being a celeb. It is right? Eh, probably not. They have to be able to handle the lack of privacy.

People are always going to take interest in what goes on celebrities lives, I dont really see that changing.
 
Date: 7/26/2008 11:17:45 PM
Author: VegasAngel
It comes with being a celeb. It is right? Eh, probably not. They have to be able to handle the lack of privacy.

People are always going to take interest in what goes on celebrities lives, I dont really see that changing.
But that''s not necessarily true, there are lots of celebrities who live without the publicity.

It would be interesting to see how the tables turned if a "normal" group of people were followed by the press and hounded for a week straight while trying to go about their business (Starbucks in the morning, bringing the kids to school, taking the trash out and having someone go through it to see if there was anything interesting, etc.). This is not to say that many celebs don''t thrive on the attention, but there are those actors, musicians, etc. who are in the business because it is truly their passion and what they excel at and don''t want the invasion of privacy that so often goes along with it but don''t have a choice.
 
& they are usually the ones have have nothing go on at the moment.

I know I would/could never be famous because I care too much about keeping my prviate life just that. If you are a celeb you know that is comes at at a price. It is crappy that some celebs are hounded 24/7 by paps-& there needs to be a crack down- but you also have regular ol'' people that just have to stop & get an autograph or picture taken.
 
I have a funny story about this. I have to say, yes I do read them, mainly at the hairdresser, or on a plane, to make the time go by. We recently had lunch with an older couple in Nantucket. They live next to Oprah in Monticeto. We asked the couple what they were doing that afternoon, the husband said, we have to go into town to buy the latest mags to see what is going on with Shiloh. Forgive me if I mispelled her name. I cracked up and said you know who she is? He said OH yes, and we cant' wait to hear about the twins!! I was dumbfounded, and told them what she had, meaning Angelina. My husband looked at me like I was speaking a foreign language, it was so funny. Guessing you had to be there.
3.gif
But know whenever I see this cute old couple I can sit and see what they know. The wife just loves her magazines. It's so silly, but sure is fun.

I loved hearing their Oprah stories...
9.gif
 
Here''s the thing.

For 99% of celebrities (the Brad & Angelina''s of the world excepted) there is a VERY simple solution for avoiding the paparazzi:

Move out of LA.

Seriously. Aside from those who are such mega stars that it is worth it to follow them around the world, for the most part you will not get photographed if you''re not in LA shopping on Robertson Blvd, eating at the Ivy, or going to the Grove.

Once you have that level of money, you can live basically anywhere you want, and if its not LA, it is not going to be cost effective for them to be hunting you down. Live in San francisco, San Diego, NY, etc, and come to LA if you have to to work.

A lot of the celebs honestly are addicted to the attention. They start out and its all flattering and strokes their ego, but then every once in a while, if it seems to die down, they get worried that they''re not "hot" anymore, and go shopping in a high-pap area or do something ridiculous. They feel that in order to be a part of the scene and be successful, they have to live in LA. And when you make that choice, it comes with the territory.

BTW, all those people you mentioned? Old guys. Sorry, there''s just not as much interest in old guys - unless they''re cheating on/with a young hot girl (or guy!)
 
Date: 7/26/2008 11:35:32 PM
Author: rockzilla
Here''s the thing.

For 99% of celebrities (the Brad & Angelina''s of the world excepted) there is a VERY simple solution for avoiding the paparazzi:

Move out of LA.

Seriously. Aside from those who are such mega stars that it is worth it to follow them around the world, for the most part you will not get photographed if you''re not in LA shopping on Robertson Blvd, eating at the Ivy, or going to the Grove.

Once you have that level of money, you can live basically anywhere you want, and if its not LA, it is not going to be cost effective for them to be hunting you down. Live in San francisco, San Diego, NY, etc, and come to LA if you have to to work.

A lot of the celebs honestly are addicted to the attention. They start out and its all flattering and strokes their ego, but then every once in a while, if it seems to die down, they get worried that they''re not ''hot'' anymore, and go shopping in a high-pap area or do something ridiculous. They feel that in order to be a part of the scene and be successful, they have to live in LA. And when you make that choice, it comes with the territory.

BTW, all those people you mentioned? Old guys. Sorry, there''s just not as much interest in old guys - unless they''re cheating on/with a young hot girl (or guy!)
Ha true but I love Morgan Freeman. Bono makes mags most often for the positive things he does.
 
Date: 7/26/2008 11:35:32 PM
Author: rockzilla
Here's the thing.

For 99% of celebrities (the Brad & Angelina's of the world excepted) there is a VERY simple solution for avoiding the paparazzi:

Move out of LA.

Seriously. Aside from those who are such mega stars that it is worth it to follow them around the world, for the most part you will not get photographed if you're not in LA shopping on Robertson Blvd, eating at the Ivy, or going to the Grove.

Once you have that level of money, you can live basically anywhere you want, and if its not LA, it is not going to be cost effective for them to be hunting you down. Live in San francisco, San Diego, NY, etc, and come to LA if you have to to work.

A lot of the celebs honestly are addicted to the attention. They start out and its all flattering and strokes their ego, but then every once in a while, if it seems to die down, they get worried that they're not 'hot' anymore, and go shopping in a high-pap area or do something ridiculous. They feel that in order to be a part of the scene and be successful, they have to live in LA. And when you make that choice, it comes with the territory.

BTW, all those people you mentioned? Old guys. Sorry, there's just not as much interest in old guys - unless they're cheating on/with a young hot girl (or guy!)
Rock, I grew up in LA and my dad and grandfather worked for one of the major studios for a total of something like 50 years if you add their employment together, so I'm pickin' up what you're laying down, but it's not just in LA that famous people are hounded. A lot of the celebs that live in other major cities are as well (DH listens to Howard Stern and I get to hear all about the photographers who wait for him and other celebrities who live in the same building in Manhattan to head out to work in the morning, or dinner, or whatever). And it still begs the question, why do people find this stuff interesting? And how many people realize that most of what we are exposed to is publicity stunts, not "real life."

And while yes, most of the men I mentioned are older (I can't put Bono in the "old" catagory), they are all still famous and yet they manage to maintain privacy (and for all we know their lives are a lot more interesting than Lindsay Lohan).
 
Date: 7/26/2008 11:43:57 PM
Author: VegasAngel

Ha true but I love Morgan Freeman. Bono makes mags most often for the positive things he does.
I love Morgan Freeman too. And while I''m sure Bono has done more than his fair share of having fun, he managed to keep it out of the press somehow (and I''m thankful his good works are published, I admire his desire to do something positive/good with his fame as opposed to simply promoting himself more).
 
Because it is impossibly curious for people to watch other people fall flat on their face.

No, really. The trash mags only print stuff when it''s scandalous - someone got pregnant, got wasted, got arrested. They very rarely post about the GOOD things, such as donations or births, unless you are super famous to begin with. Lindsey Lohan would be nothing without all the mags trashing her about the drugs and alcohol. The same with Paris Hilton. Britney Spears would have fallen off the planet by now if she wasn''t bat-shit-crazy. It''s just how it goes.

That said...I like reading Pink is the New Blog because he posts good stuff, too, and THAT is the stuff I want to know about.
 
It''s funny, because I see a parallel between a part of society''s obsession with celebrities and the average high schooler''s obsession with the "popular crowd".

I watch it happen all the time--something goes down in the "cool" clique at school and ALL of the kids are talking about it. "OHMIGOD, Alex texted Christina last night and was like ''I am so over you'' and then Christina found out that her BFF Stacy was with Alex when he sent the text so then Christina called Stacy and . . . " blah blah blah. It doesn''t matter if the kids talking about it have never even spoken to Christina and Alex, they still know who they are, everyone they''ve "dated", who Alex is planning on asking to prom, and what movie he saw last Friday.

I''m not a reader of rag mags myself, and I have to admit that I really didn''t even know Brad and Angelina were married and had had a child of their own until I saw the blonde one the cover of some magazine in the grocery store. I am so uncool, as my students would say.

BUT, I think the obsession has something to do with our natural tendency to be interested in other people''s lives. I don''t know if we''re interested because we want to compare our own choices to others'' choices, or what, but I think everyone does it. If it''s not with celebrities, it''s probably with your friends or family--"I''m surprised that Sally and John haven''t had children yet, it''s not like they''re getting any younger!" You know what I mean?

Celebrities are probably interesting to so many people because they feel like they "know" them after watching them on TV or in movies. There''s also something glamorous about peeking into the lives of the "rich and famous", because now that I think of it I do love watching the MTV show "Cribs" to see what their houses look like.
 
I have not read this thread so I will read it after I post. I am not really interested in celebs. I mean if I see something on Yahoo news I will skim it but I won't go out of my way to read about them. Only once in awhile will I look at one of the magazines. I laugh because my friends know more than me about celebs and I don't watch Entertainment tonight or those other shows. This may sound weird but I feel a little stressed out when I do read about them so I rather pass.

eta: I do like to hear the positive stuff rather than the negative stuff, like you all are saying with Bono. I rather hear about them making a difference in society.
1.gif
 
My guess is the same reason why people watch soap operas...because to some people, their lives are so much more entertaining than our own or the lives of people we know. That''s not to say our lives aren''t interesting, but it isn''t always entertaining. The fame and fortune celebrities have allow them to experience things most people will never experience and I think it''s human curiosity to some extent to see how "the other half" lives. I don''t keep up with all the celebrity gossip, but I do pay attention to engagements/weddings for the bling and the dress/venue/etc.
1.gif
I don''t think there''s anything wrong with factual celebrity news in magazines, but I *DO* think that most of that stuff doesn''t belong on CNN, MSNBC, etc...pretty sad actually.
 
Date: 7/27/2008 12:36:55 AM
Author: Haven
It''s funny, because I see a parallel between a part of society''s obsession with celebrities and the average high schooler''s obsession with the ''popular crowd''.
I think that''s a really good insight, Haven!

I do also think that people WANT to see them "fall" and see that they are normal people too. Our celebs are built up into these huge characters whose perfection they can never actually achieve. So if they''re fat, it''s ok that we''re fat too. Because.. hey, I don''t have to be perfect then either.

I don''t pay much attention either personally. The only thing I do feel somewhat curious about is what the genetic combination of Brad and Angelina will look like- Shiloh is a cutie!
 
Like Haven said, I think some people are curious about the lives of the rich and famous because they feel like they know them (if they watch their shows and/or movies, etc.).

I get People once in a while, and I do occasionally watch Entertainment Tonight or E! but I''ve never checked out Perez Hilton, TMZ, or other celebrity gossip sites.

I see why people are curious about certain celebs but I''ve never understood why people have this fascination about people who are famous for no reason (Paris or Nicki Hilton, the Kardashian sisters, etc.). That really bothers me for some reason, but I''m not sure why. Maybe it''s because I don''t feel that they''ve contributed in any great way to something meaningful.
 
Date: 7/26/2008 10:34:41 PM
Author:KimberlyH
I am really curious as to why anyone finds the lives of celebrities, as displayed to the public through the slanted eyes of the media, PR people, etc,, interesting enough to spend time discussing, either on a discussion board or in real life. Care to share why you are interested, if, in fact, you are? And if you''re not, why do you think you just don''t care?

I have no idea why people love celebrities so much! Although I will admit to reading Perez regularly, I can''t say I''m super interested in any particular celebrity. I think I read it because it''s a habit at this point! It really is strange that people''s full time job is stalking celebrities and taking their picture getting coffee, shopping, etc.

I guess I''ve never been that into celebrities. I guess I just don''t aspire to that type of lifestyle, so I would have no reason to be into them. The same goes for famous musicians.

Although I have to admit that I might actually run screaming after David Beckham if I had the opportunity. As a soccer player, I love him for his soccer skills only, though.
9.gif
His perfect hot body and dead sexy face don''t interest me at all!
11.gif
 
Date: 7/26/2008 10:52:36 PM
Author: WishfulThinking
I have almost no interest in it whatsoever. I think of it this way: I don''t really spend all that much time wondering about, discussing, or obsessing over the lives of my friends, family, and neighbors, so why would I care about what are essentially just other, random people?


Sure, they''re famous. Yes, they have more money than I or anyone else I am likely to know will ever have. Yes, I suppose they do ridiculous things sometimes. I just fail to see why those things mean that I should care more about them than I would about someone else. Got arrested? Oh well. Wore baggy clothes? Media field day! Pregnant? Fat? I honestly just don''t care that much. I think it''s a teensy bit invasive to learn the details of someone else''s life, and I certainly have more interesting things to think and talk about.


Hopefully I didn''t offend anyone in saying any of that! It just fascinates me how much people get ''into'' learning [read: stalking] about the minute details of famous peoples'' lives. I don''t get it!

A big ditto to all of this! I don''t understand it either--I feel bad for them for the most part. I wouldn''t want someone scrutinizing every small thing I did.
 
I do have some interest but mostly when I''m bored. In real life I care about relationships and how people interact so my interest isn''t too far off base I suppose. I mostly seem to like younger woman celebrities who have a career and children. I do glance, but not activitily seek out, stories about them.
 
Most of the time, I have no idea who these people even are. Guess I live in a weird sort of bubble with 'The Economist' and the "New Yorker'. I remember hearing people talk about 'Brangelina" or whatever that was, and going 'Huh?' I only found out what that meant a few months ago.

I mean, I go to the movies and know most of the popular music stars and things. I just don't know whether they're married or what their kids names are or anything like that.

Absolutely Z.E.R.O. interest.

I do think it must be hard on celebrities, but other than that, I don't see anything wrong with it. I just worry it must make their lives so hard being watched all the time.
 
Date: 7/27/2008 10:41:12 AM
Author: Independent Gal

I do think it must be hard on celebrities, but other than that, I don''t see anything wrong with it. I just worry it must make their lives so hard being watched all the time.
I think there is something wrong with watching a celebrity, or anyone for that matter, go through what appears to be a real struggle (drug addiction, divorce, etc.) and have it turned into a three ring circus that affects not only the person who has chosen to be famous, but their friends and family as well. There are some moments in life that are so raw and painful and difficult that no matter who you are I think you should have the right to go through them privately. I think we cross that line when we watch them as though they are part of a movie made for our entertainment, not realizing or taking the time to think about how little we really know, beyond what we''re spoon fed by the media, about what is really going on with these people and that this isn''t entertainment, these are peoples'' real lives.


P.S. IG, I''m only quoting you because you are the last person to express this sentiment, it''s not directed at you, it''s a general comment (and one you might not understand as you don''t follow celebs!).
 
Date: 7/27/2008 12:36:55 AM
Author: Haven
It''s funny, because I see a parallel between a part of society''s obsession with celebrities and the average high schooler''s obsession with the ''popular crowd''.

I watch it happen all the time--something goes down in the ''cool'' clique at school and ALL of the kids are talking about it. ''OHMIGOD, Alex texted Christina last night and was like ''I am so over you'' and then Christina found out that her BFF Stacy was with Alex when he sent the text so then Christina called Stacy and . . . '' blah blah blah. It doesn''t matter if the kids talking about it have never even spoken to Christina and Alex, they still know who they are, everyone they''ve ''dated'', who Alex is planning on asking to prom, and what movie he saw last Friday.

I''m not a reader of rag mags myself, and I have to admit that I really didn''t even know Brad and Angelina were married and had had a child of their own until I saw the blonde one the cover of some magazine in the grocery store. I am so uncool, as my students would say.

BUT, I think the obsession has something to do with our natural tendency to be interested in other people''s lives. I don''t know if we''re interested because we want to compare our own choices to others'' choices, or what, but I think everyone does it. If it''s not with celebrities, it''s probably with your friends or family--''I''m surprised that Sally and John haven''t had children yet, it''s not like they''re getting any younger!'' You know what I mean?

Celebrities are probably interesting to so many people because they feel like they ''know'' them after watching them on TV or in movies. There''s also something glamorous about peeking into the lives of the ''rich and famous'', because now that I think of it I do love watching the MTV show ''Cribs'' to see what their houses look like.
Wow, Haven, I should have known you''d have some great insight into my question! I couldn''t even follow your conversation, except for the "blah, blah, blah" part. Maybe my lack of insight comes from the fact that I was totally uninvolved in HS. Thanks for taking the time to think about what I was asking and sharing your thoughts!
 
Well I think that many celebrities do court the paparazzi attention. I used to go to LA frequently for work, and I would always see celebrities in certain spots where paparazzi hung out. Robertson Boulevard comes to mind. The Ivy, Kitson, Newsroom Cafe, etc. There is really no reason to go there if you don''t want to be photographed. The shopping isn''t that great (Kitson sucks!) and I''ve never been to the Ivy but I''ve heard the food''s not that great either.

Although I agree that no one deserves to have their personal lives scrutinized, when people pursue a career in Hollywood today, they all know going into it exactly what''s going to happen if they do become famous. Yes, the celebrity stalking has gotten worse, but that doesn''t seem to be stopping anyone from moving to LA and trying to make it.

I think that if celebrities truly want to be left alone, they could just move out of LA and Malibu. Even New York City. I guarantee that if a celebrity lived where I live, they wouldn''t have paparazzi stalking their every move. And of course they should be able to live wherever they want without worrying about getting their picture taken every time they leave the house, but that''s just the nature of their job.
 
Date: 7/27/2008 11:22:52 AM
Author: thing2of2
Well I think that many celebrities do court the paparazzi attention. I used to go to LA frequently for work, and I would always see celebrities in certain spots where paparazzi hung out. Robertson Boulevard comes to mind. The Ivy, Kitson, Newsroom Cafe, etc. There is really no reason to go there if you don''t want to be photographed. The shopping isn''t that great (Kitson sucks!) and I''ve never been to the Ivy but I''ve heard the food''s not that great either.

Although I agree that no one deserves to have their personal lives scrutinized, when people pursue a career in Hollywood today, they all know going into it exactly what''s going to happen if they do become famous. Yes, the celebrity stalking has gotten worse, but that doesn''t seem to be stopping anyone from moving to LA and trying to make it.

I think that if celebrities truly want to be left alone, they could just move out of LA and Malibu. Even New York City. I guarantee that if a celebrity lived where I live, they wouldn''t have paparazzi stalking their every move. And of course they should be able to live wherever they want without worrying about getting their picture taken every time they leave the house, but that''s just the nature of their job.
I absolutely agree some celebs court the attention, I think there''s a sense of "if I''m not in the papers I''m losing my fame" especially among younger actors. And there are celebrities that move away to avoid some of the press (Johnny Depp, for example), but I don''t know how successful he has been at keeping himself and his family out of the public eye.

COuld they move? Sure. But should someone have to when their career is based in a certain place, just so they don''t end up on camera every time they step out their front door? And moving doesn''t guarantee the photographs will stop, there are pictures of famous people on vacation in some random places all of the time.
 
Date: 7/27/2008 11:33:16 AM
Author: KimberlyH

Date: 7/27/2008 11:22:52 AM
Author: thing2of2
Well I think that many celebrities do court the paparazzi attention. I used to go to LA frequently for work, and I would always see celebrities in certain spots where paparazzi hung out. Robertson Boulevard comes to mind. The Ivy, Kitson, Newsroom Cafe, etc. There is really no reason to go there if you don''t want to be photographed. The shopping isn''t that great (Kitson sucks!) and I''ve never been to the Ivy but I''ve heard the food''s not that great either.

Although I agree that no one deserves to have their personal lives scrutinized, when people pursue a career in Hollywood today, they all know going into it exactly what''s going to happen if they do become famous. Yes, the celebrity stalking has gotten worse, but that doesn''t seem to be stopping anyone from moving to LA and trying to make it.

I think that if celebrities truly want to be left alone, they could just move out of LA and Malibu. Even New York City. I guarantee that if a celebrity lived where I live, they wouldn''t have paparazzi stalking their every move. And of course they should be able to live wherever they want without worrying about getting their picture taken every time they leave the house, but that''s just the nature of their job.
I absolutely agree some celebs court the attention, I think there''s a sense of ''if I''m not in the papers I''m losing my fame'' especially among younger actors. And there are celebrities that move away to avoid some of the press (Johnny Depp, for example), but I don''t know how successful he has been at keeping himself and his family out of the public eye.

COuld they move? Sure. But should someone have to when their career is based in a certain place, just so they don''t end up on camera every time they step out their front door? And moving doesn''t guarantee the photographs will stop, there are pictures of famous people on vacation in some random places all of the time.
Well, a lot of celebs dont want to live in LA anyway, it is just more convenient & most have multiples homes. Geography isnt going to stop a popular celeb from being photographed although in other countries there is a lot less craziness pap wise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top