shape
carat
color
clarity

Choosing a Style''

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

kaylagee

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Messages
1,213
some info re: hand/finger types

from http://www.theprincessjewelers.com/1buyengagemt.html

"Choosing a Style

...In considering the style, you should consider the shape of the fingers and hands. Generally speaking, the size of the ring and stone should correspond to the size of the hand.

If you have long, bony fingers, and/or muscular hands, a larger, thicker ring with a more prominent stone (or stones) flatters your hand. If you have large hands and long fingers, you are probably the only type of person who can look good in a large pronged setting. These kinds of rings are often the simplest style and show off the stone over and above the setting.

If you have wide and short fingers, a medium sized ring with a large stone can look attractive, so long as it remains flat against your hand (try to stay away from pronged settings, in which the diamond protrudes out from the ring).

If you have small fingers that are thin and delicate, thin and delicate settings will complement your hands. And those with short fingers should stick to small stones. Again, the choice of style is up to you, but you should try to keep it simple so that the ring does not swallow your hand.


For more clues on style, you can look at other jewelry you wear (or that your partner wears), and determine if it is more modern or antique, gold or silver, etc. If the wearer hardly wears any jewelry, simplicity is the best bet. The more extravagant the style of dress, the more extravagant the jewelry style should be."
 
huh, well I agreed with almost none of that
20.gif
.... Guess I am 100% out of it.
 
And those with short fingers should stick to small stones.


23.gif
23.gif
33.gif
After looking at many hand shots here it seems like my fingers are definitely on the short side.

grrrr. I'm lusting over these huge rocks but lately noticing that the real estate on my stubs is limited. Weird.

Also wish they'd actually defined 'small' or 'large' in mm or carats.

Any professional evaluation of this advice? Is it true?

34.gif
 
My goodness... Every high fashion jewelry maker tried to arbitaje elegance: if that version does not fit your taste, no problem, there's always another.


Check this out
"Buying a diamond or gemstone ring should be a delightful experience but it should also be an informed decision. It's a process of making choices: the right choices...

Let's consider your hand shape. The basic rule couldn't be simpler: width adds width, length adds length. So, if you want to diminish the width of your hand, look at rings with an elongated design."



Expecting any consensus among style gurus might not be practical: if they didn't have diverging opinions, what's the use ?
2.gif
 
Date: 5/16/2005 10:29:33 PM
Author: valeria101
My goodness... Every high fashion jewelry maker tried to arbitaje elegance: if that version does not fit your taste, no problem, there''s always another.

...Expecting any consensus among style gurus might not be practical: if they didn''t have diverging opinions, what''s the use ?
2.gif

LOL!
9.gif
 
haha hmmm i think the design guru of the latter article might have failed out of design school.

41.gif



although design wise, these represent the 2 major schools of thought. compliment or contrast. neither should be taken at face value however as the only acceptable solution. i think that detail prongs and setting style and band width is a little over the top.
it really comes down to scale and proportions. some people can pull off designs that others can''t. a solitaire sitting high looks amazing on some people, while others benefit from side stones to bring down the scale towards the finger. and others benefit form eternity bands to visually lengthen the setting.

***please excuse the designer babble
25.gif

 
Date: 5/16/2005 11:25:09 PM
Author: lost on 5th
haha hmmm ....it really comes down to scale and proportions. some people can pull off designs that others can't. a solitaire sitting high looks amazing on some people, while others benefit from side stones to bring down the scale towards the finger. and others benefit form eternity bands to visually lengthen the setting.
***please excuse the designer babble
25.gif



No I appreciate it.

High settings - cathedrals and such are a horror on me.

I wish there was a science of getting the most flattering shape, size, and setting the very first time(I reset the same rb in three different rings before abandoning it altogether) Of course, when you're getting engaged or (just buying diamond jewelry in general) *everything* looks great .. until you calm down & analyse it to pieces.
 
Ana,

Does the 1ct./6.5mm rb for ring size 6 ring represent some sort of ideal? Why is it highlighted? Have you done a similar chart for fancies?
34.gif


ed. : Does setting choice affect this? For instance w/ a halo setting do you include the rim in the measurement? Does prong height affect the perception?

i know, i need to go to sleep.
26.gif


anavaleriachart.jpg
 
great chart ana!
36.gif


for the rest of you looking... notice that it is referencing the internal diameter of the ring (i.e. the size of your finger)... so the proportion is finger size to diamond. the ring alone will look different by percentage since you will be seeing the outside diameter of the band.
35.gif
 
I''ve actually been to this store and on occasion check out what they have online, so it was funny to see something quoted from them!
 
Perhaps becuase most stores carrya a stock size 6 and for whatever reason girls seem to want a minimum 1 ct? Neat chart though!
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top