muddy sparx
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2017
- Messages
- 27
I tested it using a presidium gem test and it read as sapphireSince we don't know whether this is a CC sapphire (and neither do you based on the previous post asking us to identify), it wouldn't be reasonable to guesstimate a fair price on it.
Do you have anyone in mind?That is a piece of rough. Most of us here buy gemstones after they have been cut, so you would have to reach out to someone who buys rough (i.e. a gem cutter) for your question to get answered.
So do you think it might be valuable? If so, I might have to contact G.I.A for testing and certificationThis colour change is very rare for sapphire. Most of the colour change sapphires are from blue to purple
And about the previous post, I also tested the presumed alexandrite on the presidium tester and it read between tourmaline, that confused me because tourmalines specific gravity is 3.06 and the other stone came out as 3.7 so it clearly is not a tourmaline ....Since we don't know whether this is a CC sapphire (and neither do you based on the previous post asking us to identify), it wouldn't be reasonable to guesstimate a fair price on it.
It tests as upper range Spinel/ lower range topaz. Just remember that the Presidum cant differentiate between manmade and natural gems if the same chemical composition. It is only registering the thermal signature not if it’s “out of the ground vs made in a laboratory”Do any of you guys know how alexandrite reads on a presidium gem tester? because it is not mentioned on the device
I am thinking of testing the refractive index just to make sure, but it certain not a garnet because it passed the garnet section. These gemstones are confusingIt tests as upper range Spinel/ lower range topaz. Just remember that the Presidum cant differentiate between manmade and natural gems if the same chemical composition. It is only registering the thermal signature not if it’s “out of the ground vs made in a laboratory”
And when comes to valuing raw crystals, firstly a gem cutter has to determine the best size, clarity gem he/she can cut from the rough. It’s not uncommon to lose up to 50% of the rough weight to get a lovely finished gemstone. The only type of people likely to buy rough gems are gem cutters. They are the only ones with the experience to assess a gem.
So say you end up with a 3.5 carats sapphire, depending on its final appearance, cut quality and clarity it might be worth between $100 and $5,000 but if it’s included, zoned or with natural fissures, the cost of cutting could be almost equal to the value of the gem
All my rough stones are torch passed. I don't buy stones which show inclusions to the naked eye, so I could say the stone is clean to the naked eyeIt tests as upper range Spinel/ lower range topaz. Just remember that the Presidum cant differentiate between manmade and natural gems if the same chemical composition. It is only registering the thermal signature not if it’s “out of the ground vs made in a laboratory”
And when comes to valuing raw crystals, firstly a gem cutter has to determine the best size, clarity gem he/she can cut from the rough. It’s not uncommon to lose up to 50% of the rough weight to get a lovely finished gemstone. The only type of people likely to buy rough gems are gem cutters. They are the only ones with the experience to assess a gem.
So say you end up with a 3.5 carats sapphire, depending on its final appearance, cut quality and clarity it might be worth between $100 and $5,000 but if it’s included, zoned or with natural fissures, the cost of cutting could be almost equal to the value of the gem
No I don't have a polariscope, how do i test it with a earth magnet?just test it with a rare earth magnet. So you normally could rule out garnet. Do you have a polariscope?