It's my friend's turn to look for rings, so I'm coming back to what was always my favorite source, in hopes of wisdom.
The lady in waiting's preference is for a designer ring, with alternating 18k rose and 18k white gold design.
I admit some of the possibilities look stunningly original and beautiful, but I had a few logistical concerns -- are they unfounded?
1. Mixing: The intrinsic underlying value diminishes as soon as you start to mix different metals (i.e. white + rose), as it can no longer be scrapped, right ? Not that scrap is something we ever set out with as the ultimate goal for any of our rings, of course.. but it is at least partially an investment, and one would not mind if it could hold its value over time?
2. 18k WG: Obviously, there is no such thing as white gold.. It is alloyed with nickel (or ideally palladium) to make it so.. Therefore, I see some irony in wanting the 18k WG, not just philosophically (in the sense of wanting higher gold content or being closer to purity, yet at the same time wanting to then mix it with something to make it look nothing like pure gold), but also practically -- as wouldn't 18k WG look "less white" than, say, 10k WG?
3. Mixing + WG: This is a concern with the combination of #1 and #2. In what I imagine is naturally not a very "white looking" 18k WG alloy, it typically needs to be rhodium plated to achieve what people perceive to be the "white gold look". Yet, because of the presence of rose gold, you would actually not be able to re-plate the finished piece in rhodium every 6mo, correct? i.e. you could not selectively plate the WG but not the RG components of the ring?
In full disclosure, I typically buy pure platinum or palladium pieces (well not 100%.. 950, whatever the standard alloy is).. So these were my first and admittedly biased reactions to the preference. I'm sure I'm just overreacting, right?
Thanks!!
Eugene.
The lady in waiting's preference is for a designer ring, with alternating 18k rose and 18k white gold design.
I admit some of the possibilities look stunningly original and beautiful, but I had a few logistical concerns -- are they unfounded?
1. Mixing: The intrinsic underlying value diminishes as soon as you start to mix different metals (i.e. white + rose), as it can no longer be scrapped, right ? Not that scrap is something we ever set out with as the ultimate goal for any of our rings, of course.. but it is at least partially an investment, and one would not mind if it could hold its value over time?
2. 18k WG: Obviously, there is no such thing as white gold.. It is alloyed with nickel (or ideally palladium) to make it so.. Therefore, I see some irony in wanting the 18k WG, not just philosophically (in the sense of wanting higher gold content or being closer to purity, yet at the same time wanting to then mix it with something to make it look nothing like pure gold), but also practically -- as wouldn't 18k WG look "less white" than, say, 10k WG?
3. Mixing + WG: This is a concern with the combination of #1 and #2. In what I imagine is naturally not a very "white looking" 18k WG alloy, it typically needs to be rhodium plated to achieve what people perceive to be the "white gold look". Yet, because of the presence of rose gold, you would actually not be able to re-plate the finished piece in rhodium every 6mo, correct? i.e. you could not selectively plate the WG but not the RG components of the ring?
In full disclosure, I typically buy pure platinum or palladium pieces (well not 100%.. 950, whatever the standard alloy is).. So these were my first and admittedly biased reactions to the preference. I'm sure I'm just overreacting, right?
Thanks!!
Eugene.