shape
carat
color
clarity

D Faint vs F None (1.01 Carat VS1 EX Cut)

nokturne

Rough_Rock
Joined
Dec 24, 2020
Messages
13
Hi guys, im searching diamond for engagement ring, would you pick D Faint or F None?
both are 1.01 Carat VS1 Excellent Cut and D Faint is $60USD cheaper.
Many Thanks
 

Attachments

  • D Faint.jpg
    D Faint.jpg
    175 KB · Views: 7
  • F None.png
    F None.png
    971.2 KB · Views: 6
Are you purposely going with low-crown/larger table?
 
You need to run them through the HCA tool. Look for stones that score 2 or under (or close to 2+ with an idealscope or aset).

Edit...use the PS search engine to find well-cut stones. Its listed under the menus above.
 
Table should be between 54-58. Depth 60-62.3. Try specifying and search again.
 
I would make sure you are looking for a better cut (as @LLJsmom said). Most people cannot tell the difference between D, E, and F, and VS2 will be eye clean in this size. I would look for F/VS2 stones with better cut.

We are also happy to help you look. What is your budget?
 
You need to run them through the HCA tool. Look for stones that score 2 or under (or close to 2+ with an idealscope or aset).

Edit...use the PS search engine to find well-cut stones. Its listed under the menus above.

the D is 3.5 and the F is 5.3, seems both are not good
btw do you know what is VIRTUAL DIAMONDS? (in the filter option)
 
You need to run them through the HCA tool. Look for stones that score 2 or under (or close to 2+ with an idealscope or aset).


the D is 3.5 and the F is 5.3, seems both are not good
btw do you know what is VIRTUAL DIAMONDS? (in the filter option)

Neither is good, unfortunately (as you saw from the HCA tool). Virtual diamonds means stones that are not in a physical store's inventory but are ordered from cutters who are often abroad. Most stones you look at online will be virtual inventory.
 
Table should be between 54-58. Depth 60-62.3. Try specifying and search again.

You need to run them through the HCA tool. Look for stones that score 2 or under (or close to 2+ with an idealscope or aset).


the D is 3.5 and the F is 5.3, seems both are not good
btw do you know what is VIRTUAL DIAMONDS? (in the filter option)

Thanks both, after refined search, these two came up, budget is around $8500USD, is it better to avoid cloud inclusion?
F none VS1.jpg score 1.5F none VS2.jpg score 1.4
 
Neither is good, unfortunately (as you saw from the HCA tool). Virtual diamonds means stones that are not in a physical store's inventory but are ordered from cutters who are often abroad. Most stones you look at online will be virtual inventory.

Virtual seems to be way cheaper and affordable, a lot more choices also
 
Thanks both, after refined search, these two came up, budget is around $8500USD, is it better to avoid cloud inclusion?
F none VS1.jpg score 1.5F none VS2.jpg score 1.4

Both of those stones look promising. Clouds aren't a problem unless the report says, "clarity grade based on clouds not shown" , which neither of these do. Can you post pics of these from whatever website is selling them?
 
Both of those stones look promising. Clouds aren't a problem unless the report says, "clarity grade based on clouds not shown" , which neither of these do. Can you post pics of these from whatever website is selling them?

is it ok to post direct link here?
 
You might want to put it on hold first in case it gets snatched by a lurker!
 
I would choose first one first cause I prefer a tiny bit steeper.
Both look good.
 
well then lets not post links atm lol, i ve made a table for some of my selection, wt do u guys think, any other attribute should i consider
compare.jpg

I like these options but would want to see images of them to decide for sure. My personal preference is for stones with depth between 61-62 and tables between 54-57 (but obviously that's just me and isn't any kind of rule).

Personally I prefer C, D, F, G over the others for that reason. Since I personally cannot tell the difference between D-F, I would likely pick C because it is the least expensive but I would want to check the pics first
 


Those both look nice, and are both eye clean!
 
I would choose first one first cause I prefer a tiny bit steeper.
Both look good.

I like these options but would want to see images of them to decide for sure. My personal preference is for stones with depth between 61-62 and tables between 54-57 (but obviously that's just me and isn't any kind of rule).

Personally I prefer C, D, F, G over the others for that reason. Since I personally cannot tell the difference between D-F, I would likely pick C because it is the least expensive but I would want to check the pics first

Some of them dont hv pics, here are the links

a. https://www.b2cjewels.com/dd/183828...m_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pricescope.com

b.
c. https://www.b2cjewels.com/dd/184050...m_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pricescope.com

d. https://www.eternitybyyoni.com/diamond_detail.php?id=2485797&ref=pricescope

e. https://www.adiamor.com/Diamonds/1....Cut-Round-Diamond/D45912578?&refer=pricescope

f. https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-4248581.htm

g. https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-4180550.htm
 


Those both look nice, and are both eye clean!

the first one is actually f from my table lol
 
If you can afford the WF options I would always choose those because you're getting a super ideal cut and have an amazing upgrade policy. Some of these don't have pics, which means you don't know what they look like IRL, and others have angles outside of the recommended ranges.

Seems g is better if WF
 
I don’t know if your budget would allow for this stone, but I absolutely love the cut/proportions of this diamond and the nice crisp, balanced arrows.


thats a bit overbudget, appreciate thought
 
If you can afford the WF options I would always choose those because you're getting a super ideal cut and have an amazing upgrade policy. Some of these don't have pics, which means you don't know what they look like IRL, and others have angles outside of the recommended ranges.

A - Additional clouds, pinpoints and surface graining are not shown
B - Sold
C - Crystal and Pinpoints
D - Internal graining is not shown. Surface graining is not shown.
E - Pinpoints
F - Additional clouds are not shown. Pinpoints are not shown.
G - Crystal, Pinpoints, Natural

do you think option C worth a go ? as C vs E/G around $2k difference
 
A - Additional clouds, pinpoints and surface graining are not shown
B - Sold
C - Crystal and Pinpoints
D - Internal graining is not shown. Surface graining is not shown.
E - Pinpoints
F - Additional clouds are not shown. Pinpoints are not shown.
G - Crystal, Pinpoints, Natural

do you think option C worth a go ? as C vs E/G around $2k difference

As I said before, I would choose the WF options over any of the others if they are in budget.
 
Not sure how to post links here- but also check out Victor Canera. His stones are really nice and he has a few in your budget. Also has a great upgrade policy And makes stunning settings.
 

Attachments

  • DCA59FA5-01EE-4A7B-AA7F-3E269F46419D.png
    DCA59FA5-01EE-4A7B-AA7F-3E269F46419D.png
    432.8 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
Not sure how to post links here- but also check out Victor Canera. His stones are really nice and he has a few in your budget. Also has a great upgrade policy And makes stunning settings.

Thankyou verymuch, i ll go n hv a look
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top