- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
----------------
As far as wanting other things to be better (house, car, etc.), I don't have any friends that are like that but I have guy coworkers who are hung up on having the best car, cell phone, etc. Everyone has different priorities, I guess. I know a guy who owns a very, very, very, very expensive car but lives in a teeny tiny one bedroom apartment and he's very happy. LOL.----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 9:48:51 PM Jennifer5973 wrote:
No. We live in a very good but not super ritzy area and we choose to stay here in our normal-sized house, fill it with the amenities we like, and generally not 'keep up with the jones'' by getting a bigger house or super fancy cars.
We do what we want when we want it, indulge our vices (diamonds, poker) are generous with friends and family, and plan to retire early. And if one of us loses our job (God forbid) we can survive--that was always our #1 goal and we've achieved it.
I got my new diamond becasue I have always wanted a nice diamond. I really don't care what the people around me think.----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 10:16:39 PM Patty wrote:
If you are looking to boost your self esteem through things, be they diamonds, houses, cars, or even careers, knowledge, prestige, etc., they will never be big enough or good enough. Someone will always have more than you. For a short while the THING will satisfy you and you will be 'happy' but then the need for MORE will set in again. Maybe your rock is big enough but not white enough. If you look closely, you see an inclusion so now you need a better clarity. Maybe you have a big new house, but the car doesn't really look good in the new garage. Maybe you are the smartest person at Yale but then a study comes out saying that Harvard is a better school.
Outside 'things' will never be enough if we are looking for them to define us. ----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 10:25:05 PM sevens one wrote:
----------------
On 8/31/2004 10:16:39 PM Patty wrote:
If you are looking to boost your self esteem through things, be they diamonds, houses, cars, or even careers, knowledge, prestige, etc., they will never be big enough or good enough. Someone will always have more than you. For a short while the THING will satisfy you and you will be 'happy' but then the need for MORE will set in again. Maybe your rock is big enough but not white enough. If you look closely, you see an inclusion so now you need a better clarity. Maybe you have a big new house, but the car doesn't really look good in the new garage. Maybe you are the smartest person at Yale but then a study comes out saying that Harvard is a better school.
Outside 'things' will never be enough if we are looking for them to define us. ----------------
Well said Patty.
----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 9:40:01 PM MichelleCarmen wrote:
Does it really matter about what our friends desire? Kind of a rude question, IMO, as it just seems completely unproductive to start talking crap about all our friends
Michelle----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 9:56:47 PM MichelleCarmen wrote:
Okay, this post is just REALLY pissing me off. I'm irritated (which will explain my grumpy posts today) and it annoys me that first, in an earlier post, you ask everyone if they have the most eye appealing diamond of their friends THEN you ask what's the deal with the friends who need to have the better diamondThis is kind of confusing to me. . .Maybe I'm just being b*tchy????
----------------
i have a friend who i have known for 30+ yrs,live in a $800k home and brought a brand new $80k BMW 6 months ago called me up last week and want to borrow $15k,so i just wonder what is going through his head living in the life style of the rich and famous.----------------[/quote]----------------
On 8/31/2004 11:00:09 PM Jennifer5973 wrote:
On 8/31/2004 10:52:31 PM vtigger86 wrote: ----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 10:16:39 PM Patty wrote:
If you are looking to boost your self esteem through things, be they diamonds, houses, cars, or even careers, knowledge, prestige, etc., they will never be big enough or good enough. Someone will always have more than you. For a short while the THING will satisfy you and you will be 'happy' but then the need for MORE will set in again. Maybe your rock is big enough but not white enough. If you look closely, you see an inclusion so now you need a better clarity. Maybe you have a big new house, but the car doesn't really look good in the new garage. Maybe you are the smartest person at Yale but then a study comes out saying that Harvard is a better school.
Outside 'things' will never be enough if we are looking for them to define us. ----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 11:03:32 PM vtigger86 wrote:
----------------
On 8/31/2004 9:56:47 PM MichelleCarmen wrote:
Okay, this post is just REALLY pissing me off. I'm irritated (which will explain my grumpy posts today) and it annoys me that first, in an earlier post, you ask everyone if they have the most eye appealing diamond of their friends THEN you ask what's the deal with the friends who need to have the better diamondThis is kind of confusing to me. . .Maybe I'm just being b*tchy????
----------------
yea, michelle it must be that time of the month again.----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 9:56:47 PM MichelleCarmen wrote:
Okay, this post is just REALLY pissing me off. I'm irritated (which will explain my grumpy posts today) and it annoys me that first, in an earlier post, you ask everyone if they have the most eye appealing diamond of their friends THEN you ask what's the deal with the friends who need to have the better diamondThis is kind of confusing to me. . .Maybe I'm just being b*tchy????
----------------
----------------
On 8/31/2004 11:03:32 PM vtigger86 wrote:
yea, michelle it must be that time of the month again.----------------
Why is it that guys INSIST on focusing on that whenever someone has a hissy-fit?
Believe me, an irritating man is FAR more aggravation-promoting than "that time of the month".
----------------
On 9/1/2004 10:16:47 AM fire&ice wrote:
I agree - wouldn't have loaned the money either.
For people who are fiscally irresponsible, the only cure is for them to actually lose something. Only when they lose something...or are on the very precipice of losing it...does it hit home.
Giving the loan only prolongs the problem and lets him continue to live irresponsibly.
----------------
On 9/1/2004 2:05:04 PM MichelleCarmen wrote:
You know, also, just because I don't agree with a person's post, doesn't mean I shouldn't participate/post/discuss MY angle. Us ladies here DO pride ourselves on being opinionated, do we not???
Michelle
----------------
----------------
If you choose to participate, that's great, of course, but if the content of the thread bothers you, I'm sure ignoring it would be a solution. That's all.----------------