pregcurious
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
- Messages
- 6,725
SouthernSunset|1391270865|3605757 said:I usually rotate a few clusters in and out to get my size fix. I also have a 7(?) Carat sapphire rough ring that I wear that is massive.
I love looking at all the 5+ carat diamonds! But something that big and expensive would make me feel nervous. I don't think I'd be confident or secure enough to wear a diamond that big. I'm only in my twenties. And other younger girls are already rather rude about about the jewelry I have(with nothing sparkly over 1 carat except one CZ ring that's 3ish) so I'd be way too self-conscious to wear something that big. I'd get judged six ways to Sunday and probably never wear it because of that.
I've looked at a lot of large sapphires though. For some reason the color I covet comes in quite a few stone of 8+ carat weight but not 2-5...
I'd still probably buy a 10-14 mm CS before a diamond though. I mean those honkers are gorgeous! But for some reason it doesn't make my heart sing like a giant pinkish purple sapphire or fire engine red spinel would. I'm crazy I know, lol.
It could also be price. 18-30 grand for a completed 8+ carat sapphire ring is a lot easier on the pocketbook than a 150-200 grand diamond, you know with my hypothetical money haha. I just think 'I could buy and set 3 or 4 dream CS's for that!!!'
FrekeChild|1391278020|3605811 said:If I could get the color I wanted in large sizes within an affordable range, you betcha I'd go big! Most of my stones are 6mm+, and I've made a rule for myself that they have to be at least 6.5mm unless the color is amazing/exactly what I want.
I forgot about my big ol' 8ct topaz. I don't keep it with the rest of my rings, because it dwarfs them, but it's still in my jewelry box!
minousbijoux|1391299081|3606028 said:I guess I'm really and truly in the minority here. While I do have some large stone rings and some large stones that are still unset, I don't think bigger is better. To me, its about the kind of ring/jewelry you want, and its proportion to the hand/ears/neck and what looks good. I love stones that are big enough to catch the light and show their magnificent color, but not so big that they scream. At some point, they end up looking like costume jewelry to me - like too much of a good thing. That said, I am most certainly not one of those people blessed with long, graceful fingers and elegant hands who can pull off a statement ring with panache.
lavatea|1391306591|3606120 said:Sometimes, but I don't think I'd feel normal wearing rings with stones much bigger. And I know I'd get looks/comments from some people. I think 8 - 8.5 mm is probably as big as I'll ever go.
I do intend to stack until I run out of finger room, though! It's more my style to wear several bands together (some with smaller stones) than one ring with one large stone.
endless_summer|1391306896|3606131 said:lavatea|1391306591|3606120 said:Sometimes, but I don't think I'd feel normal wearing rings with stones much bigger. And I know I'd get looks/comments from some people. I think 8 - 8.5 mm is probably as big as I'll ever go.
I do intend to stack until I run out of finger room, though! It's more my style to wear several bands together (some with smaller stones) than one ring with one large stone.
I've never done stackers, but some of the ones of this forum and SMTB are amazing (there's a whole recent thread of them!) - more finger real estate would be awesome!
lavatea|1391313746|3606216 said:endless_summer|1391306896|3606131 said:lavatea|1391306591|3606120 said:Sometimes, but I don't think I'd feel normal wearing rings with stones much bigger. And I know I'd get looks/comments from some people. I think 8 - 8.5 mm is probably as big as I'll ever go.
I do intend to stack until I run out of finger room, though! It's more my style to wear several bands together (some with smaller stones) than one ring with one large stone.
I've never done stackers, but some of the ones of this forum and SMTB are amazing (there's a whole recent thread of them!) - more finger real estate would be awesome!
The most I've done so far is 3, lol. I just don't have the ring collection built up yet. I'd like to do 4-6 on a couple of fingers. But my fingers aren't very long so the rings will have to be fairly thin. And I have to actually buy them, lol. They're in my "someday" plans.
FrekeChild|1391278020|3605811 said:If I could get the color I wanted in large sizes within an affordable range, you betcha I'd go big! Most of my stones are 6mm+, and I've made a rule for myself that they have to be at least 6.5mm unless the color is amazing/exactly what I want.
I forgot about my big ol' 8ct topaz. I don't keep it with the rest of my rings, because it dwarfs them, but it's still in my jewelry box!
minousbijoux|1391299081|3606028 said:I guess I'm really and truly in the minority here. While I do have some large stone rings and some large stones that are still unset, I don't think bigger is better. To me, its about the kind of ring/jewelry you want, and its proportion to the hand/ears/neck and what looks good. I love stones that are big enough to catch the light and show their magnificent color, but not so big that they scream. At some point, they end up looking like costume jewelry to me - like too much of a good thing. That said, I am most certainly not one of those people blessed with long, graceful fingers and elegant hands who can pull off a statement ring with panache.
Odds are good that I'll keep it forever - it's the ring that we had made as a push present/my daughter's birthstone.missy|1391347542|3606367 said:FrekeChild|1391278020|3605811 said:If I could get the color I wanted in large sizes within an affordable range, you betcha I'd go big! Most of my stones are 6mm+, and I've made a rule for myself that they have to be at least 6.5mm unless the color is amazing/exactly what I want.
I forgot about my big ol' 8ct topaz. I don't keep it with the rest of my rings, because it dwarfs them, but it's still in my jewelry box!
OK I am in love Freke...gorgeous!!! Umm, not sure if anyone else has called dibs yet but DIBS! if you ever decide you can part with this baby... The color is so soft and pretty and blue is my favorite color.
endless_summer|1391306696|3606124 said:minousbijoux|1391299081|3606028 said:I guess I'm really and truly in the minority here. While I do have some large stone rings and some large stones that are still unset, I don't think bigger is better. To me, its about the kind of ring/jewelry you want, and its proportion to the hand/ears/neck and what looks good. I love stones that are big enough to catch the light and show their magnificent color, but not so big that they scream. At some point, they end up looking like costume jewelry to me - like too much of a good thing. That said, I am most certainly not one of those people blessed with long, graceful fingers and elegant hands who can pull off a statement ring with panache.
I definitely don't think you're in the minority at all - I agree with what you're saying completely - I'd just be curious to know what you're threshold for too big is/approaching costume jewelry