- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 2,202










Last edited:
It is an awesome sapphire, and great color, too.You gave your opinion on the setting but not the stone. I know that the stone is genuine and would be a lot more if it was in a setting in better shape. I did not see the photo because he said the owner would not part with it. If I do find the setting to be newer I will have the stone reset. The stone deserves to be in a beautiful setting.
So beautiful! What a pattern! The orchid reminds me of the striking pattern in your meteorite jewelry. Re: the prongs, they remind me of tiny tabs or fingers, holding the stone. Or, like the tentacles of an anemone gently holding it.
I also thought it was possible that the ring had been polished (or worn) to the point that it obscured some of the original design elements.
The fact that the ring has been re-shanked and polished or worn extensively also makes it likely that the prongs were re-tipped at some point.
Stracci, re this point: Jewelry made during that time period with that kind of sapphire would have been well made and carefully executed.
That's often my thinking too, but... not necessarily. My father has several rings inherited from his father and grandfather, both of whom apparently had rather grand taste. A year or two ago I took two of the rings to a trusted local jeweler for repairs, and was surprised when he told me that both stone had been set in stock settings - which didn't exactly match the stones - rather than custom settings. Both are deco-era rings, one set with carbonado and the other with a fairly large natural star sapphire... set in something akin to the Stuller of that time! They were most likely made in Asia (where that side of the family lived) but my great-grandfather also travelled extensively (we have a watch and silverware from France) so it's possible they came from Europe.
Your flower and ring are so enchanting!