Hi - Would the inclusions in a GIA report be at the same standard as an AGS report? For instance, I'm looking at a GIA SI1 and note there are some inclusions per their report (see link below). I compared this to several AGS Ideal 000 SI1 stones and it seems like the AGS stones have way more inclusions noted in their reports. Is this just a different standard between the two reports or is the GIA SI1 just a cleaner SI1?
GIA SI1: https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=6371583538https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=6371583538 - I saw this one in person and couldn't really notice the inclusions from the naked eye. I know it's above the 1.3 number on the HCA scale but this was for sure my favorite stone in person
AGS SI1: https://www.whiteflash.com/pdf/104109307001.pdf ; https://www.whiteflash.com/pdf/104110484032.pdf - here are a couple examples that are AGS stones with SI1 clarity. The reports make it seem like they have way more inclusions. Perhaps the inclusions aren't as pronounced? Curious from other's experience.
Any help will be greatly appreciated
GIA SI1: https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=6371583538https://www.gia.edu/report-check?reportno=6371583538 - I saw this one in person and couldn't really notice the inclusions from the naked eye. I know it's above the 1.3 number on the HCA scale but this was for sure my favorite stone in person
AGS SI1: https://www.whiteflash.com/pdf/104109307001.pdf ; https://www.whiteflash.com/pdf/104110484032.pdf - here are a couple examples that are AGS stones with SI1 clarity. The reports make it seem like they have way more inclusions. Perhaps the inclusions aren't as pronounced? Curious from other's experience.
Any help will be greatly appreciated