Ideal-scope image again?

[OSU COWBOYS]

Whats your thoughts? I will post pics when everything is said and done and on the finger

......

 

[love rocks]

I''m hardly an expert...but the arrows look a little "off" to me - the center is off, and some of the arrow "bodies" don''t meet the arrow "head"...

Just my .02 though

 

[valeria101]

Pretty darn "ideal" not "harts and arrows" as the most keen on the brand would have them. With the face up looks showing reasonable arrows as is, it would have that look too anywhere bar under the H&A viewer. If this is branded "Harts and Arrows" and sold as such... well, the premium kind''a implies even more precission. As is, this one is on the better side of AGS0 ideal.

Hope this is not too confusing. It doesn''t help that a couple'' dozen definitions and standards for ideal cutting are accepted in the same time.

 

[pqcollectibles]

Pretty vivid IS with some good contrast. Should be a dazzler!

Some lucky lady is gonna be all smiles when she sees this beauty!

 

[OSU COWBOYS]

This is an AGS O, SI2, 1.5ct. It is eye clean unless I really study it for awhile, which at that time I go crosseyed!

Thanks for the comments everyone. As long as it has a good sparkle and color that is all that matters to me and my future fiance. It was rated a 2.4 on the HCA if this helps. Thanks again.

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

I question the proportions that gave this stone HCA 2.4.

Would you like to list them?

I predict it is about T55% C35 and P 40.85.

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Actually I modelled this again with a blown up photo and i suspect the proportions are even better than those I just posted.

 

[OSU COWBOYS]

Here is the sarin and 40x pic of the diamond. Tell me what you think of it please!! Gary, you think the proportions are better than what it says??? Thanks

 

[OSU COWBOYS]

40X PIC of the diamond

 

[pqcollectibles]

Date: 1/5/2005 4:58:53 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
Actually I modelled this again with a blown up photo and i suspect the proportions are even better than those I just posted.

Garry,......... I am constantly amazed how that software allows you to "guesstimate" so close to the actual measurements.

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Arthur modeled the real photo yesterday and got a slightly shallower pavilion angle yet again. I think the Sarin scan is wrong - it is a slightly shallower pavilion and therefore a nicer stone than the #''s suggest.

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

Cross linked to this thread
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/hca-2-4-to-1-2-on-same-diamond.24421/

 

[Rank Amateur]

Do you have a pic under a more "normal" lighting condition? I am curious about how the inclusions fade into the background, especially on a well-cut stone. It''s an AGS SI2, right?


(Verrrrrry impressive Garrrrry. Not only can you predict a stone''s proportions, but you can predict an error in the sarin scan. Ooooooooo.)

 

[OSU COWBOYS]

I dont have any pictures yet, but when I do it will be under show me the ring. The inclusions are totally eye clean. Those pics were from 40x and with a 10x it is very hard to see if you can see them at all!!!