reena
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 2,531
I''ve been meaning to post pics of my right hand ring for a while now, so here it is . . . this ring was handed down to me by my mother, who received the ring from her uncle when she was about my age. Apparently, her uncle created the ring for his wife (who was deceased by the time he passed the ring down to my mom) using the diamond from his mother''s and his father''s rings. Thus the stones are fairly old and have been in my family for a long time.
Pricescoper''s nightmare: I don''t have the faintest idea of the specs on the stones.
I suppose I could have it appraised, but I''ve never gotten around to it. Maybe some day. In truth, I''m not even 100% positive what cut the two stones are--my mom told me she thought they were OMC, but I think I''ve heard that OMCs are not usually round, so I''m guessing OEC. It''s a little hard to tell, though. Maybe you experts out there can give me your opinions! As you may be able to tell from the pics, the band of the ring is gold, but the scrolls on the face of the ring are white gold.
I really really love this ring because, although the design is a little "unusual" and not something I would have selected on my own, I know that the reason for that was 100% sentimental (i.e., my uncle wanted to create something special for his wife that incorporated both of his parents'' stones into a single ring). Which I think is cool. In addition, the diamonds are FAR from perfect--one has a chipped girdle, and both have visible inclusions (I looked at it under a loupe once--woah
), but they''re still beautiful. I like having a little reminder on my finger that, despite our (my!) obsession with things like carat weight and color and pavillion angles, those things don''t ALWAYS have to matter.
Pricescoper''s nightmare: I don''t have the faintest idea of the specs on the stones.
I really really love this ring because, although the design is a little "unusual" and not something I would have selected on my own, I know that the reason for that was 100% sentimental (i.e., my uncle wanted to create something special for his wife that incorporated both of his parents'' stones into a single ring). Which I think is cool. In addition, the diamonds are FAR from perfect--one has a chipped girdle, and both have visible inclusions (I looked at it under a loupe once--woah