The Heart of the Ocean
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2020
- Messages
- 15
The square modified brilliant is 2.5 carats, table 68%, with a depth of 67.3%. I know the general rule of thumb is the table shouldn’t exceed the depth, but since it’s only a marginal amount, I don’t see it being an issue. The girdle is thick, but I don’t think that will be an issue either.
The clarity is Vs1, the symmetry and polish are excellent. It’s GIA, but in hindsight I wish I would have gone with AGS because they can grade light performance and cut grade on square modified brilliants. Any opinions on the girdle and marginal issue of table being greater than depth are welcomed, but my main concern is the depth since some companies say it’s within the recommended range and some such as AGS ideal says it’s not. 65-75, 62-74 or 68-75, 71-75. Why are they’re so many ranges?
In your expert opinions, do you think the depth will noticeably affect the way light will be distributed? feel free to weigh in on the thick girdle too. I forgot to get a pic of said diamond and have only seen it in the very flattering jewelry store lights bc it was a dreary, rainy day.
The clarity is Vs1, the symmetry and polish are excellent. It’s GIA, but in hindsight I wish I would have gone with AGS because they can grade light performance and cut grade on square modified brilliants. Any opinions on the girdle and marginal issue of table being greater than depth are welcomed, but my main concern is the depth since some companies say it’s within the recommended range and some such as AGS ideal says it’s not. 65-75, 62-74 or 68-75, 71-75. Why are they’re so many ranges?
In your expert opinions, do you think the depth will noticeably affect the way light will be distributed? feel free to weigh in on the thick girdle too. I forgot to get a pic of said diamond and have only seen it in the very flattering jewelry store lights bc it was a dreary, rainy day.