JannPaul diamond

[Klee_Bee]

Hi guys! After months of research and thanks to your advice, my other half and I finally purchased the ring from JannPaul. Needless to say, the entire process and support was fantastic.
The ring hasn't arrived yet, for now we only have the stone and we are designing the setting.
How does the stone seem to you?

Furthermore, when you rotate the stone you can see some graining in the lower part (as in the attached photo). Is it just an effect of the video?

https://www.gcalusa.com/certificate-search.html?certificate_id=342890019
Thanks again!!
Any opinion? @DejaWiz @Kim N

 

[0-0-0]

Love seeing JP cuts. They are always so precise no matter the cut.

The red circled part is likely the inclusions noted on the report. It’ll not be noticeable in person given that it’s a VVS2 and located along the girdle.

 

[DejaWiz]

Diamond looks good - the speckled effect along the bottom is likely reflection from the photo box/setup used during grading and imaging...I've seen it quite a bit with GCAL graded diamonds.

 

[Klee_Bee]

Love seeing JP cuts. They are always so precise no matter the cut.

The red circled part is likely the inclusions noted on the report. It’ll not be noticeable in person given that it’s a VVS2 and located along the girdle.

Thanks!!

 

[Klee_Bee]

Diamond looks good - the speckled effect along the bottom is likely reflection from the photo box/setup used during grading and imaging...I've seen it quite a bit with GCAL graded diamonds.

Thanks! this reassures me!
But it only looks good? I thought it was more than just “good”

 

[DejaWiz]

Thanks! this reassures me!
But it only looks good? I thought it was more than just “good”

Good meaning nothing wrong/bad with it at all

 

[Klee_Bee]

Ahahah thank you!
but it's not what you would choose for yourself right?

 

[DejaWiz]

Ahahah thank you!
but it's not what you would choose for yourself right?

It would be something that I would consider because of the smaller 56 table and shorter 75 lowers, although something with a taller crown height appeases my tastes more, like this one:

Loupe360

loupe360.com

 

[lovedogs]

I think the stone is great--no concerns from me

 

[Klee_Bee]

I think the stone is great--no concerns from me

Thank you!

 

[Klee_Bee]

It would be something that I would consider because of the smaller 56 table and shorter 75 lowers, although something with a taller crown height appeases my tastes more, like this one:

Loupe360

loupe360.com

I also focused on the crown angle. However, I hope that the stone can perform well! Thank you!

 

[DejaWiz]

I also focused on the crown angle. However, I hope that the stone can perform well! Thank you!

You're very welcome and it will - it's a very well cut and proportioned diamond!

 

[Klee_Bee]

You're very welcome and it will - it's a very well cut and proportioned diamond!

Sorry if I ask you one more thing. I would like to know for the future what the difference is between a crown angle of 34.0 or 34.5. Thank you!

 

[Klee_Bee]

Diamond looks good - the speckled effect along the bottom is likely reflection from the photo box/setup used during grading and imaging...I've seen it quite a bit with GCAL graded diamonds.

About this, I'm a little worried because this effect can also be seen a lot in the video recorded by JP (see attachhed photos). The same effect can be seen at the end of the video in the internal part where I point with the mouse pointer.