Hello all,
As I’m trying to educate myself on the minor facets and finer implications of cut, I’m curious to know the difference in ideal scope images of diamonds that indicate true light leakage vs. possible azimuth misalignment (as I may have been misinterpreting a few). There are older discussions on this forum that explore this very topic of azimuth and yaw, but I’m interested from a layperson’s perspective in terms of analyzing ideal scope, or even ASET images (as I do not have access to fancy and expensive tech). Is there a way to interpret the possible azimuth angles for pavilion and crown facets from the degree of light red vs dark red areas as one can sort of gauge the degree of painting and/or digging from an ASET? Also, from what I’ve read, the Helium report can provide azimuth angle readings, but can the latest Sarine/Diamension Axiom? Hoping a few experts can chime in and hopefully I’m not taking everyone down a rabbit hole. Thanks!
As I’m trying to educate myself on the minor facets and finer implications of cut, I’m curious to know the difference in ideal scope images of diamonds that indicate true light leakage vs. possible azimuth misalignment (as I may have been misinterpreting a few). There are older discussions on this forum that explore this very topic of azimuth and yaw, but I’m interested from a layperson’s perspective in terms of analyzing ideal scope, or even ASET images (as I do not have access to fancy and expensive tech). Is there a way to interpret the possible azimuth angles for pavilion and crown facets from the degree of light red vs dark red areas as one can sort of gauge the degree of painting and/or digging from an ASET? Also, from what I’ve read, the Helium report can provide azimuth angle readings, but can the latest Sarine/Diamension Axiom? Hoping a few experts can chime in and hopefully I’m not taking everyone down a rabbit hole. Thanks!