overthemoon
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 49
I'm back! If you'll remember, I came out of lurkerdom and introduced you to my OEC (OMC? - still have to call Dave Atlas...) cushion, and explained my engagement & setting stories (see this: https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/thank-you-for-your-advice-pics-of-my-new-oec-beauty.64725/ thread). Well, I've worn my new beauty proudly for the past two weeks, and I am realizing I may not have made the best setting choice for my stone.
At first I thought the prongs were too "dainty", and wouldn't provide enough of a buffer from everyday contact or the occasional whack and the stone might fall out - but I got over that pretty quickly, as the stone is in fact set good and tight.
I've realized that the real problem is that my stone sits up very high, therefore exposing about 3/4 of it - including the very thin girdle. It's not a prong issue, it's a height and vulnerability issue.
I love love LOVE the setting, and I love that I found it at a local craftsmans' shop...but I'm worrying WAY too much about it. A smaller stone would work PERFECTLY with the setting, as it would sit lower, with less overhang, and be more protected by the prongs.
I can't believe I am actually considering having it re-set. I'm SOOOOOO torn, because it is beautiful and perfect in SOOOOOO many ways. I should add, my DF is completely understanding. His main gift was really the special stone, and he wanted me to set it however I liked. He wants to protect it as much as I do. I figure I could possibly sell (double
) the original setting to recoup some of the cost...unless you talk me down from the ledge!
Below are pics of settings I am considering...subtle changes to what I have, really, but more appropriate for my stone and my (very active & slightly clumsy
) lifestyle. They both have a "support belt" (not sure what that structure is called) in the basket on/very near the stone's girdle, as well as hefty double-claw prongs for added coverage & security. Am I correct in assuming these details will help? I prefer not to go with a halo, but would consider it if it would make the ring significantly more wearable.
What do you think? THANK YOU, in advance, for your help!
Sincerely,
(slightly frustrated but still very much) "Over The Moon"
At first I thought the prongs were too "dainty", and wouldn't provide enough of a buffer from everyday contact or the occasional whack and the stone might fall out - but I got over that pretty quickly, as the stone is in fact set good and tight.
I've realized that the real problem is that my stone sits up very high, therefore exposing about 3/4 of it - including the very thin girdle. It's not a prong issue, it's a height and vulnerability issue.
I love love LOVE the setting, and I love that I found it at a local craftsmans' shop...but I'm worrying WAY too much about it. A smaller stone would work PERFECTLY with the setting, as it would sit lower, with less overhang, and be more protected by the prongs.
I can't believe I am actually considering having it re-set. I'm SOOOOOO torn, because it is beautiful and perfect in SOOOOOO many ways. I should add, my DF is completely understanding. His main gift was really the special stone, and he wanted me to set it however I liked. He wants to protect it as much as I do. I figure I could possibly sell (double
Below are pics of settings I am considering...subtle changes to what I have, really, but more appropriate for my stone and my (very active & slightly clumsy
What do you think? THANK YOU, in advance, for your help!
Sincerely,
(slightly frustrated but still very much) "Over The Moon"