packrat
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 10,614
Absolutely not, there are many wonderful antique silver pieces, but make sure you''re careful about whom you choose to do the job, opals can be tricky to work with and you wouldn''t want to ruin it in the process.Date: 4/21/2010 7:49:46 PM
Author: packrat
Would it be bad to put it in sterling for pocketbook sake or should I wait and save up for white gold? It doesn''t have to be in gold to be a piece that is passed down does it? I don''t want to be a cheapskate on it b/c it is really important.
Rather, more like the rhodium plating most white gold pieces receive. White gold is actually a very pale yellow, which get covered by rhodium. Sorry for nitpicking, it is just that I love the real white gold colour and I get sad that it is nearly always covered by rhodium.Date: 4/22/2010 10:51:29 AM
Author: VapidLapid
I too think silver and sally are great ideas. You might consider asking her to use 999 fine silver rather than sterling. Sure 999 isn''t strong enough for forks and spoons but this is a pendant and doesn''t need that kins of strength. I work with 999 for a few reasons. It is brighter and whiter, more like white gold. It doesn''t tarnish. The copper makes the silver in sterling tarnish because copper loves oxygen, same as how copper causes firescale. 999 anneals at much lower temperature than sterling, and because there is no copper, needs no fluxing! A properly hand made piece in 999 will be work-hardened sufficiently for a pendant or a necklace.