katamari
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- May 18, 2008
- Messages
- 2,949
DH and I retained our own last names after marrying. Now, with a LO on the way, we are trying to figure out how to handle its name. Our inclination was to give it a first and middle name along with both our last names. However, this seems like a lot of name, especially considering what a small percentage of people in your life ever know or use your middle name(s).
Unfortunately, too, my last name isn't really a proper middle name. Several of my friends have used their last names as only middle names for their LOs, but their last names were along the lines of Anderson, Mitchell, Jackson, and other things that would be reasonable as a name in U.S. culture. My last name is not terribly unique, but is notably ethnic and nothing people would consider using as a proper name (think von Trapp).
Finally, some FYIs specific to our situation (although feel free to vote more generally):
We are not considering my last as the only last. It is important to DH's extended family to "carry on the name" which is unimportant to us or my family.
We live in a progressive area where it will cause no bureaucratic problems whatsoever that the members of our family do not share a common last name.
It is important for DH that my name is present, and I would also like it to be; but, I feel like just cramming my last in as a second middle name that LO will never use or be called isn't necessarily keeping it present.
Thanks for your help!
Unfortunately, too, my last name isn't really a proper middle name. Several of my friends have used their last names as only middle names for their LOs, but their last names were along the lines of Anderson, Mitchell, Jackson, and other things that would be reasonable as a name in U.S. culture. My last name is not terribly unique, but is notably ethnic and nothing people would consider using as a proper name (think von Trapp).
Finally, some FYIs specific to our situation (although feel free to vote more generally):
We are not considering my last as the only last. It is important to DH's extended family to "carry on the name" which is unimportant to us or my family.
We live in a progressive area where it will cause no bureaucratic problems whatsoever that the members of our family do not share a common last name.
It is important for DH that my name is present, and I would also like it to be; but, I feel like just cramming my last in as a second middle name that LO will never use or be called isn't necessarily keeping it present.
Thanks for your help!