moderatelypoorstudent
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
- Messages
- 146
Hey everyone, been a long time lurker but really didn''t feel like posting till I hit this stretch: we''re about 7 months away from getting engaged. Well, it''s sometime between anyday now and 7 months-- I try hard to steer clear of asking if the ring has been bought yet/when will it be bought etc.
So here is the story: SO and I have been dating for almost 3.5 years now and I will readily admit to being under 25. My SO is over 30 and doing well career wise. And we''ve had our wedding date picked out for maybe .... 1.5-2 years now. Suffice it to say that it''s around 1 yr 7 months away and he adamantly wants about a 1 year engagement and has flat out told me: we''ll be engaged by (date of wedding, 200.
I''ve been reading a lot about having timelines set out and I guess even for myself, I''m thinking to set one. I feel as though, despite having plenty of "fertility time" it is still important to set a timeline. If we aren''t engaged by our 4th year anniversary which is a little after the (wedding date, 0 mark... I am debating walking. I''ve never mentioned this to him, because frankly, we''re doing so well together.
So my real question is: is it unreasonable to set a timeline at my age? We have been dating for a decent period of time, but the fact remains: I''m not in a rush. I think perhaps my internal timeline stems from an issue of: if you haven''t asked by 4 years and you SAID you would... then maybe you''re not sure because we''re not really right for each other? Is that totally irrational?
So here is the story: SO and I have been dating for almost 3.5 years now and I will readily admit to being under 25. My SO is over 30 and doing well career wise. And we''ve had our wedding date picked out for maybe .... 1.5-2 years now. Suffice it to say that it''s around 1 yr 7 months away and he adamantly wants about a 1 year engagement and has flat out told me: we''ll be engaged by (date of wedding, 200.
I''ve been reading a lot about having timelines set out and I guess even for myself, I''m thinking to set one. I feel as though, despite having plenty of "fertility time" it is still important to set a timeline. If we aren''t engaged by our 4th year anniversary which is a little after the (wedding date, 0 mark... I am debating walking. I''ve never mentioned this to him, because frankly, we''re doing so well together.
So my real question is: is it unreasonable to set a timeline at my age? We have been dating for a decent period of time, but the fact remains: I''m not in a rush. I think perhaps my internal timeline stems from an issue of: if you haven''t asked by 4 years and you SAID you would... then maybe you''re not sure because we''re not really right for each other? Is that totally irrational?