New E-ring Pics -- Thanks GOG/pricescope

[croziermd]

Just wanted to thank everyone on pricescope for their insight, and share some pictures of the new E-ring, which I will soon give away. Had a great experience with Jonathan and Good Old Gold -- I decided to drive up to Long Island to be able to pick the stone out in person. Here is the diamond I decided on:




http://www.goodoldgold.com/0_90ct_j_vs1_h%26a.htm




It is set in a size 4.25 white gold Stuller six-prong solitaire setting. I attached a few digital pics I took below, enjoy

 

[KBerly]

crozier, we can't see the pics...hurry!!!

stone looks like a beauty though, congrats

 

[croziermd]

Whoops...I'll do them one at a time..sorry about that.

 

[croziermd]

 

[croziermd]

 

[croziermd]

 

[KBerly]

just as i suspected...just stunning

i love the stuller solitaire settings and look at those arrows! when do you plan to propose??

 

[croziermd]

Thanks for the compliments

I plan to propose soon, but just in case my gf stumbles on this post, I'm not going to say when, I will update when i do though

 

[canuk-gal]

Hi:




I simply love it! Wonderful choice.




cheers




Sharon

 

[lmurden]

It's absolutely gorgeous

You've got a winner!

 

[headlight]

I am speechless... that is perhaps the most beautiful diamond I have laid my eyes on.


Lucky, lucky girl, indeed!

 

[Nick Toseland]

Bling, very nice. dont do huge diamonds

 

[headlight]

----------------
On 10/23/2004 10:19:11 PM Nick Toseland wrote:





Bling, very nice. dont do huge diamonds
----------------

What does that mean

 

[wonka27]

As always, GOG comes up with another winner!!!

Congrats

 

[Patty]

Wow, that's beautiful and you got some amazing pictures of it...good job! Is your Stuller solstice head set low, medium or high? I'm just wondering b/c I have the low 4 prong head and yours looks higher than mine. (I always debate if I made the right decision!)

 

[headlight]

Patty, that is not the Stuller Solstice; it is the 6-prong solitaire "Tiffany style" #140309H.

 

[KBerly]

i thought it was the stuller too because crozier said it was. patty, i thought it looked like the high set stuller myself.

 

[croziermd]

It is a Stuller setting, it is not the solstice however. Headlight is correct, 6-prong tiffany... #140309H. I think the H is for heavy though and not high, but it is a .75 carat head, so maybe that is the difference?

 

[Jennifer5973]

Gorgeous stone...she is going to LOVE it.

Congrats!

 

[Nick Toseland]

----------------
On 10/23/2004 10:27:49 PM headlight wrote:

----------------
On 10/23/2004 10:19:11 PM Nick Toseland wrote:



Bling, very nice. dont do huge diamonds
----------------

What does that mean

----------------

It means it very nice, very white. I prefer diamonds up to 1.5 Carats. Not to keen on diamonds bigger than that

 

[headlight]

----------------
On 10/23/2004 11:11:19 PM Nick Toseland wrote:

----------------
On 10/23/2004 10:27:49 PM headlight wrote:

----------------
On 10/23/2004 10:19:11 PM Nick Toseland wrote:







Bling, very nice. dont do huge diamonds
----------------

What does that mean

----------------

It means it very nice, very white. I prefer diamonds up to 1.5 Carats. Not to keen on diamonds bigger than that

----------------

Wish I was "wired" to feel that way!

 

[headlight]

----------------
On 10/23/2004 11:10:24 PM croziermd wrote:







It is a Stuller setting, it is not the solstice however. Headlight is correct, 6-prong tiffany... #140309H. I think the H is for heavy though and not high, but it is a .75 carat head, so maybe that is the difference?

----------------

Yes, the "H" is for "heavy" and not for "high". This particular Stuller style doesn't come in height options, as does the Stuller Solstice.

 

[KBerly]

gotcha

 

[researcher]

Beautiful stone!

I love the ribbon picture!

 

[Patty]

----------------
On 10/23/2004 11:28:00 PM headlight wrote:

----------------
On 10/23/2004 11:10:24 PM croziermd wrote:




It is a Stuller setting, it is not the solstice however. Headlight is correct, 6-prong tiffany... #140309H. I think the H is for heavy though and not high, but it is a .75 carat head, so maybe that is the difference?

----------------

Yes, the 'H' is for 'heavy' and not for 'high'. This particular Stuller style doesn't come in height options, as does the Stuller Solstice.----------------

Ah, thanks for clearing that up for me!

 

[slammie]

Beautiful stone!! congratulations!! Most of all, I love your pictures...very artsy

 

[strmrdr]

awesome!
Congrates :}

 

[didiamond]

The ring is beautiful! And the pictures are great too! I love the way you put the ring on a piece of ribbon. Just lovely!

 

[Kaili]

Ohh, it's sooo pretty. She is going to love it!
You did a great job

 

[pearcrazy]

----------------
On 10/23/2004 11:11:19 PM Nick Toseland wrote:

----------------
On 10/23/2004 10:27:49 PM headlight wrote:

----------------
On 10/23/2004 10:19:11 PM Nick Toseland wrote:



Bling, very nice. dont do huge diamonds
----------------

What does that mean

----------------

It means it very nice, very white. I prefer diamonds up to 1.5 Carats. Not to keen on diamonds bigger than that
----------------

Did I miss something? I still don't know what that means. The diamond is .90 carats. Oh, and to Croziermd, it's lovely! I'm sure she'll love it.