Is it normal practice for the photographer''s contract to say that all of the copyrights of the photography belong to the photog and that the photog can use the pictures for displays, publication, etc? I am looking at my first photog contract and saw this.
Just wondering cause I don''t know that I want my pic just going around but if that is standard practice then I guess that is the way it is.
Just wondering cause I don''t know that I want my pic just going around but if that is standard practice then I guess that is the way it is.