Photoshop blemished Tacori pictures on overstock.com

[gulliverseyes]

Funny, look for the missing side stone in this Picture. Then, when you run your mouse over the middle view, a different diamond is missing (the one next to the first). If you click the big picture for a close-up, you see the missing stone is a poor photoshop job, I'm sure to keep the Tacori dealers from having a melt down given the crazy low price...

 

[FireGoddess]

That''s pretty funny!!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I''m afraid I don''t see what you are talking about. All I see is a difference in the relection of light from the first to the second stones when the ring is moved.

 

[gulliverseyes]

I didn''t want to be specific because it''s fun to look for, really not the true side stone, but the left of center, first and second stones on the side of the band ... they are tiny stones that surround the ring.

 

[orbaya]

I don''t think there''s a stone missing. I just think that the light is reflecting off the tables of the diamonds at different angles.

 

[gulliverseyes]

...if I may add:

I saw saw this ring tonight, the real deal ... or, at least a very close model from Tacori. I will say, it is such a beautiful ring, I couldn''t believe my eyes. Even with a CZ in it, it made my night.

 

[gulliverseyes]

I dabble in photoshop, if you''re looking at the right stone, I can tell you it''s a quick photoshop cut. Click on the big picture to blow it up, and you''ll see.

As nice as this ring is, can they adjust these to finger size? Looks like a tough one to adjust!

 

[oobiecoo]

I agree... it just looks like the reflections from the light at different angles.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Date: 12/20/2007 10:44:03 PM
Author: orbaya
I don''t think there''s a stone missing. I just think that the light is reflecting off the tables of the diamonds at different angles.

Ditto. I don''t see any missing stones, just a reflection on the tables.

No, this would not be a style that should be sized. I''d only order it in the correct size.

 

[gulliverseyes]

You guys may be correct, might be an artifact in the picture from the refection. But, I also dabble in photography and find it strange that the artifact is the exact size of the stone, and the same size of the second stone in the second picture.

 

[strmrdr]

~2x mag of the image the diamond is there.
Your seeing table glare on the first stone and shadow on the second.

 

[stebbo]

Date: 12/20/2007 11:08:13 PM
Author: gulliverseyes
You guys may be correct, might be an artifact in the picture from the refection. But, I also dabble in photography and find it strange that the artifact is the exact size of the stone, and the same size of the second stone in the second picture.

I''d say it''s the size of the table than the diamond. Definitely table reflection. Plus it moves

 

[neatfreak]

Date: 12/20/2007 11:08:13 PM
Author: gulliverseyes
You guys may be correct, might be an artifact in the picture from the refection. But, I also dabble in photography and find it strange that the artifact is the exact size of the stone, and the same size of the second stone in the second picture.

It''s not that odd...it''s just the flash/light reflecting off the table of the stone. Which is the entire top, flat, portion of the stone, and with a stone that little, all you''d really see...

 

[stebbo]

Date: 12/20/2007 11:34:57 PM
Author: stebbo

Date: 12/20/2007 11:08:13 PM

Author: gulliverseyes

You guys may be correct, might be an artifact in the picture from the refection. But, I also dabble in photography and find it strange that the artifact is the exact size of the stone, and the same size of the second stone in the second picture.

I''d say it''s the size of the table than the diamond. Definitely table reflection. Plus it moves

ETA: obvious comment after storm just posted a pic.

 

[strmrdr]

~10x mag of the image...
it wasn''t photoshopped in.

 

[strmrdr]

open the picture in photoshop gulliverseyes and show us where the image was edited using the burn tool too tone down a refection.
Hint look at 1200% and its odvious.
crop it and post the area.

 

[tberube]

that''s definitely a table glare.

 

[Steel]

Hi gulliverseyes,

Sorry but it does seem to be just a table reflection. Thanks for the thread; fun for me to look at even if it is not unusual. Who dosen't want to take time out to look at a pretty Tacori setting...

Keep posting!
[sorry I posted the wrong smilie, but what the hay, it's Friday night; have a beer on me, ps I'm on the right]