DotDot|1404834859|3708994 said:As for the bowtie, I was able to see the stone light up completely but I guess most of time, it would have some sort of bowtie. Is it an issue that I should pause on?
DotDot|1405017833|3710681 said:Been talking to the vendor. Is $4700 with AGL brief reasonable for the stone? Will see it today and try to take more pictures.
DotDot|1405017833|3710681 said:Been talking to the vendor. Is $4700 with AGL brief reasonable for the stone? Will see it today and try to take more pictures.
TL said:If it comes back as heated, there may be an additional fee to test for diffusion, if they cannot determine it with standard gemological tools. You have to let them know if you want to pay for further testing then, because it could be diffused which would render the gem valued at a fraction of what you paid.
I would double check this with AGL. I paid an extra $100 to have my 2.4 carat sapphire tested with a mass spectrometer (a very expensive machine).
DotDot|1405081595|3711312 said:TL said:If it comes back as heated, there may be an additional fee to test for diffusion, if they cannot determine it with standard gemological tools. You have to let them know if you want to pay for further testing then, because it could be diffused which would render the gem valued at a fraction of what you paid.
I would double check this with AGL. I paid an extra $100 to have my 2.4 carat sapphire tested with a mass spectrometer (a very expensive machine).
Hm..? The stone was sold as heated; I of course want verification that there are no other treatments. I thought the AGL testing will verify the (lack of) diffusion? Will the Prestige Gemstone report for standard ID report test any differently than Brief? Or I am better off to pay for brief + this mass spectrometer instead?
Thank you!
Chrono|1405081947|3711318 said:AGL will do their best to check for signs of diffusion under high magnification. Often times, this is sufficient but sometimes it cannot be determined, or they suspect diffusion from the appearance of the inclusions. If so, then they will contact you to let you know and offer the option of using the mass spectrometer at an added cost. I'd say you are better off with the brief, and wait to see if additional testing is necessary.
DotDot|1405086176|3711348 said:What I am hearing is:
AGL Gem Brief receives the same tests as Prestige ID/Enhancement report so no need to pay more for Prestige report.
In case additional testing needed for diffusion, we can request using the mass spectrometer.
Since the vendor is including the AGL cost as part of the sale, they will have no incentive to put more $ in for testing. I guess I will have to reach out to AGL seperately and hoping they will contact me in case additional testing is needed. With the cost, I think paying another $100 is reasonable to ensure peace of mind.
Does GIA's report automatically include all testing needed (incl mass spectrometer if necessary), or I should stick with AGL?
PSers, you have such wealth of knowledge. I am so glad I am getting help from the experts through this process.