colorluvr
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 1,867
For those of you who missed the original thread - here is the link:
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/speakings-of-rainbows.142323/
I took the stone to Portland yesterday and the gemologist told me that she was 90% sure that it was completely natural. She would not commit to 100% positive without extensive, expensive testing, but she said the reason she felt 90% sure was that she found a "fine fingerprint inclusion" in the stone that was consistent with the type found in natural quartz. She said that fingerprint inclusions are sometimes found in the synthetics, but that they are more "globby" (her word) and not fine like the one in mine, which made her feel comfortable to state that it was natural. She also did not see any of the telltale signs of a synthetic.
She said if the stone was perfect (had no inclusions), she would not have been able to be as certain, but because she was able to see the inclusion under very high magnification, and that it was consistant with what was found in natural quartz as opposed to the type found in synthetic quartz, she felt it was natural. She did state however, that the synthetics are getting better and better and harder to detect.
So.... I''m happy with the results, and considering what I paid for the stone, I''m comfortable keeping it with a 90% certainty rating. If it were an expensive or rare stone, then I would go the extra mile and expense to get that 100% certainty, but with a fun stone like this one, I''m content.
In fact, after I got home, I bought ordered another one, only this one is smaller (aprox. 10mm) and it is a squarish EC cut that I hope to put in a ring some day. They are not on top of my list of projects, but I didn''t want to miss this last one because it was the size and color I wanted (more purple) so I nabbed it.
Squarish EC cut ametrine (I should get it by Monday)
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/speakings-of-rainbows.142323/
I took the stone to Portland yesterday and the gemologist told me that she was 90% sure that it was completely natural. She would not commit to 100% positive without extensive, expensive testing, but she said the reason she felt 90% sure was that she found a "fine fingerprint inclusion" in the stone that was consistent with the type found in natural quartz. She said that fingerprint inclusions are sometimes found in the synthetics, but that they are more "globby" (her word) and not fine like the one in mine, which made her feel comfortable to state that it was natural. She also did not see any of the telltale signs of a synthetic.
She said if the stone was perfect (had no inclusions), she would not have been able to be as certain, but because she was able to see the inclusion under very high magnification, and that it was consistant with what was found in natural quartz as opposed to the type found in synthetic quartz, she felt it was natural. She did state however, that the synthetics are getting better and better and harder to detect.
So.... I''m happy with the results, and considering what I paid for the stone, I''m comfortable keeping it with a 90% certainty rating. If it were an expensive or rare stone, then I would go the extra mile and expense to get that 100% certainty, but with a fun stone like this one, I''m content.
In fact, after I got home, I bought ordered another one, only this one is smaller (aprox. 10mm) and it is a squarish EC cut that I hope to put in a ring some day. They are not on top of my list of projects, but I didn''t want to miss this last one because it was the size and color I wanted (more purple) so I nabbed it.
Squarish EC cut ametrine (I should get it by Monday)