Selkie
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2006
- Messages
- 2,876
Hi! I''m glad I found this site. I like the diversity of opinions and taste that everyone has here, and am hoping for some suggestions. My boyfriend proposed on New Years (not coincidentally, it was our 5-year anniversary), and we are now dealing with THE RING. I''m an obsessive "Googler" and have been all over the place looking for something I''m not sure exists. If that means I have to design it, great, but I need someplace to start!
I have big hands, since I''m tall and literally large-boned and my ring finger is size 9. I wear mostly silver rings, only one or two at a time, if at all, and I like a simple but classy look. The idea that I am choosing something I''ll want to keep on my hand forever is a little weird to me. I''m considering getting a ring that serves as both an e-ring and wedding band, and I''m not particularly concerned whether this confuses people (MOM)
.
Basically, this is what I''m looking for in the design:
Center stone=approx. 1 carat (~6mm dia.) round blue sapphire (we''re looking at a couple now)
two side stones= .33 ct. round diamonds from earrings my grandmother gave me
Wide white gold or platinum band about the same diameter as the sapphire, or a bit larger (6-8mm) POSSIBLY with a thin rim of yellow gold around the edge.
To offset the width, I want the band to have open scrollwork/filigree, sort of a leaf pattern if possible. I''ve attached a picture of a band I like, for an example (but without the small diamonds).
Low-profile setting, either flush or bezel for the diamonds, and bezel or a low basket for the sapphire.
I like the antique look, but most filigree rings seem to be wide at the stone and tapering around the finger. I''m pretty sure I want consistent width. I''ve seen a number of wedding bands that fit this bill, but I''m concerned that setting three stones on a simple wide band will look, I don''t know, glued-on, makeshift, something like that. I''m also worried that a bezel setting for the center would look odd with a less contemporary style band. Any pictures or suggestions would greatly appreciated. Thanks!
I have big hands, since I''m tall and literally large-boned and my ring finger is size 9. I wear mostly silver rings, only one or two at a time, if at all, and I like a simple but classy look. The idea that I am choosing something I''ll want to keep on my hand forever is a little weird to me. I''m considering getting a ring that serves as both an e-ring and wedding band, and I''m not particularly concerned whether this confuses people (MOM)
Basically, this is what I''m looking for in the design:
Center stone=approx. 1 carat (~6mm dia.) round blue sapphire (we''re looking at a couple now)
two side stones= .33 ct. round diamonds from earrings my grandmother gave me
Wide white gold or platinum band about the same diameter as the sapphire, or a bit larger (6-8mm) POSSIBLY with a thin rim of yellow gold around the edge.
To offset the width, I want the band to have open scrollwork/filigree, sort of a leaf pattern if possible. I''ve attached a picture of a band I like, for an example (but without the small diamonds).
Low-profile setting, either flush or bezel for the diamonds, and bezel or a low basket for the sapphire.
I like the antique look, but most filigree rings seem to be wide at the stone and tapering around the finger. I''m pretty sure I want consistent width. I''ve seen a number of wedding bands that fit this bill, but I''m concerned that setting three stones on a simple wide band will look, I don''t know, glued-on, makeshift, something like that. I''m also worried that a bezel setting for the center would look odd with a less contemporary style band. Any pictures or suggestions would greatly appreciated. Thanks!