- Joined
- Jan 26, 2003
- Messages
- 22,161
Well...Big Brother is watching what you read. He is now looking at what you take out of the library in his search for terrorists...and he doesn't need to obtain any pesky subpoena from a judge to get all the info. about you. I read mainly legal thrillers. Perhaps the Feds will think I am planning to become an attorney! Oh...and the Feds can also see records of what a patron read on the Internet.
A link to the article is below and here are some excerpts from it:
"Using its expanded power under the antiterrorism law known as the USA Patriot Act, the F.B.I. is demanding library records from a Connecticut institution as part of an intelligence investigation, the American Civil Liberties Union said Thursday.
...
The A.C.L.U. said that in the Connecticut case, the bureau was using a separate investigative tool, a type of administrative subpoena known as a national security letter, to get records related to library patrons, reading materials and patrons' use of the Internet.
The bureau's power to use national security letters to demand records without a judge's approval was expanded under the antiterrorism law. Last year, a federal judge in Manhattan struck down part of the subpoena provision as unconstitutional, in part because it allowed for no judicial oversight, but the Justice Department is appealing the ruling.
Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the A.C.L.U., said the demand for the Connecticut library records 'shows that our supposed hysteria over the Patriot Act wasn't so hysterical after all.'
'This is a prime example of the government using its Patriot Act powers without any judicial oversight to get sensitive information on law-abiding Americans,' Mr. Romero said."
article
Deborah
A link to the article is below and here are some excerpts from it:
"Using its expanded power under the antiterrorism law known as the USA Patriot Act, the F.B.I. is demanding library records from a Connecticut institution as part of an intelligence investigation, the American Civil Liberties Union said Thursday.
...
The A.C.L.U. said that in the Connecticut case, the bureau was using a separate investigative tool, a type of administrative subpoena known as a national security letter, to get records related to library patrons, reading materials and patrons' use of the Internet.
The bureau's power to use national security letters to demand records without a judge's approval was expanded under the antiterrorism law. Last year, a federal judge in Manhattan struck down part of the subpoena provision as unconstitutional, in part because it allowed for no judicial oversight, but the Justice Department is appealing the ruling.
Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the A.C.L.U., said the demand for the Connecticut library records 'shows that our supposed hysteria over the Patriot Act wasn't so hysterical after all.'
'This is a prime example of the government using its Patriot Act powers without any judicial oversight to get sensitive information on law-abiding Americans,' Mr. Romero said."
article
Deborah