I bought a lovely sapphire stone from the Natural Sapphire Company (NSC) recently. I dealt with Steven Bliss (he is fabulous by the way). For insurance purposes I had a local jeweler examine the stone (now set in a simple platinum setting). He valued the sapphire at $3,000. I paid $5,250 for the stone. Needless to say, I am puzzled by the discrepancy. Let me provide some additional specifics:
Weight: 1.50 ct
Dimensions: 7.01x6.92x3.91
Shape: Round
Cut: Brilliant
Origin: Ceylon
Enhancement: none, no indications of heating
Clarity: IF, VVS1
Color: Cornflower Blue
Inclusions: None visible under 10 power magnification
I realize that there is some measure of subjectivity to valuing gemstones; nevertheless, I am trying to determine whether I need to get a GIA or AGL evaluation. Essentially I am trying to determine definitively if there is any heat enhancement. Am I right to assume that this pivotal to the real market value of the stone? Owing to the overwhelming positive reviews for the NSC would I be wasting my money on another report?
Since this is my first post I hope I am following protocol. Thanks for any insight.
Weight: 1.50 ct
Dimensions: 7.01x6.92x3.91
Shape: Round
Cut: Brilliant
Origin: Ceylon
Enhancement: none, no indications of heating
Clarity: IF, VVS1
Color: Cornflower Blue
Inclusions: None visible under 10 power magnification
I realize that there is some measure of subjectivity to valuing gemstones; nevertheless, I am trying to determine whether I need to get a GIA or AGL evaluation. Essentially I am trying to determine definitively if there is any heat enhancement. Am I right to assume that this pivotal to the real market value of the stone? Owing to the overwhelming positive reviews for the NSC would I be wasting my money on another report?
Since this is my first post I hope I am following protocol. Thanks for any insight.