- Joined
- Mar 2, 2009
- Messages
- 13,248
FWIW this is the Stuller setting I was favoring for that emerald
https://www.stuller.com/products/bu...ion&recommendationId=125636#/mounting-options
I'm apparently in the minority, but I voted for the second one. I love the face down view of #1 but I don't like it much from any other angle. I think the second one is very attractive from all angles and will nicely compliment your emerald. (It is listed as a best seller so I am guessing it must look pretty good IRL). Your stone is really pretty!
You sorta get used to paying those custom setting fees.
I can’t believe this will come in under $400. I really need to start using stock settings.
10K gold is VERY durable.I LOVE the first one so much. I don't know anything about the durability of 10K gold though
Yup. It tarnishes more quickly I think. But I’m ok with the occasional polish10K gold is VERY durable.
I had a 10K class ring and I don't remember it tarnishing. But, my girlfriend wore it most of the time. LOLYup. It tarnishes more quickly I think. But I’m ok with the occasional polish
Decided on setting 2 after all after much chatting with my jeweler and measuring of my finger diameter lol.
Will start a thread when it’s done
Can’t wait to see how it turns out. You’re making me want to set my emerald now, now, now!
Oooo. Any pics of your emerald?
I am dismayed to find that the first setting is still winning in the polls! I find the gold beads on the first one to be too large and a little gaudy looking, not at all like a milgrain effect. The second setting is simpler and more elegant, and if I may say so, fits in with the aesthetic of your other two rings more. The leaf motif in the gallery is lovely and makes me think back to your abstract lotus ring.