ChristineGreco
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 34
ChristineGreco|1412690559|3763587 said:Wow... No flourescence. Yes... Twinning wisps, feather, crystal... in that order. I bought this diamond in person, knowing it scored 3.9 on HCA and comparing it in person to two other diamonds scoring 1.7 and still preferred the look of this one. I'm extremely happy with how it performs. The only thing that worried me was that hazy appearance under harsh lighting or direct sun. What do diamonds that score well on HCA look like under these lighting conditions? Does anyone have pictures to share? Also, my diamond is eye clean to my standards which are high. I thought the inclusions in SI2 diamonds are not supposed to affect brilliance? Thank you...
luvdajules|1412691748|3763596 said:Twinning wisps and clouds can be problematic, especially as you go down the clarity scale. It sounds like you are overall very happy with your diamond but just wanted to know more about a specific lighting condition that you noticed a different look to your stone. Diamonds are very beautiful so I hope you continue to enjoy it. I also have an Si2 and I think it's just marvelous. I was able to get my dream size within budget. Since you knew about the HCA score of your diamond before your purchase, it sounds like you made some thoughtful tradeoffs too and still thought it was beautiful. You really have a lovely wedding set, enjoy in much happiness and health!
MelisendeDiamonds|1412692030|3763600 said:ChristineGreco|1412690559|3763587 said:Wow... No flourescence. Yes... Twinning wisps, feather, crystal... in that order. I bought this diamond in person, knowing it scored 3.9 on HCA and comparing it in person to two other diamonds scoring 1.7 and still preferred the look of this one. I'm extremely happy with how it performs. The only thing that worried me was that hazy appearance under harsh lighting or direct sun. What do diamonds that score well on HCA look like under these lighting conditions? Does anyone have pictures to share? Also, my diamond is eye clean to my standards which are high. I thought the inclusions in SI2 diamonds are not supposed to affect brilliance? Thank you...
Even "Ideal cut" diamonds can look dark in photographs in direct sunlight. Try first cleaning your diamond thoroughly especially the pavilion(bottom) then viewing it under a tree with a bit of shade and then snap some more photos.
I am sorry but you aren't going to get any definitive advice based on the grading report and those two photographs in this thread.
An independent appraiser(one not selling diamonds) with the diamond in hand may be able to point out if there are any major flaws that impact brilliance and specifically if the grade setting twinning wisps are impacting brilliance. Given the GIA excellent cut grade, while the proportions may cause some loss of life at the edges of the table I doubt that is causing a major problem.
If you can't return it(or don't want to) than just enjoy it and realize that in bright sunlight the camera and your eyes has to adjust to the abundance of light and it make objects look darker.
diamondseeker2006|1412692164|3763601 said:SI2 inclusions can affect brilliance. I assume that is what you are seeing unless your stone wasn't cleaned (as in brushing the pavilion) before you looked at it in the sun. Being dirty is the number one reason stones will look hazy when otherwise having no cut or clarity issues.
HappyNewLife|1412696407|3763639 said:both the diamonds my Fiance and I have score under 2 on the HCA. And had good light return based on the idealscope image. And this is still how they look in the sun (and I am obsessive about cleaning them):
Mine:
Hers (on my finger):
Neither diamond has fluor, both are G/eye-clean SI1. The other night, my diamond looked BLACK under this weird outdoor fluorescent crap lighting. BLACK, but sparkly. It freaked me out, LOL.
HappyNewLife|1412697849|3763660 said:glad to be of help. I was actually googling last night to figure out why my diamond went BLACK under that light, while my fiance's diamond did not. I think it's because hers is chronically filthy and mine is always clean, LOL!
Here is the GIA report info on my inclusions (both diamonds are GIA XXX):
cloud
crystal
needle
feather
indented natural
additional clouds not shown
hers:
feather, crystal
additional clouds not shown
DANG, I had forgotten what a mess my diamond was, LOL. What's funny is, mine is much more sparkly than hers. It just goes darker in certain lighting. While hers is much whiter and more of an "icy" look. Not crushed ice, just very different from mine.
ChristineGreco|1412698677|3763668 said:I would think because they both scores under 2, they would perform similarly.
MelisendeDiamonds|1412699668|3763673 said:ChristineGreco|1412698677|3763668 said:I would think because they both scores under 2, they would perform similarly.
No. What gave you that idea?
The HCA if used properly is a blunt weeding out tool. If the score is below 2 according to the author it is worth investigating further with an Idealscope to look closely at performance.
The flavor of a diamond cannot be ascertained by average measurements shown on a grading report and then computed by HCA.
ChristineGreco|1412700983|3763687 said:I guess I thought that because so much emphasis is placed here on the HCA, and I thought I read that if two stones both score under 2, no one score is better than the other... But that is still only in the context of a rejection tool. Thank you both for clarifying. Being that I selected my diamond in person, and thought it performed well, despite the 3.9 HCA score, do the angles/measurements have no redeeming qualities? Despite GIA triple ex and despite my eyes telling me the stone is beautiful... Those angles do not work well together??
HappyNewLife|1412701378|3763692 said:If you love your diamond and how it performs in most lighting, enjoy it! I wouldn't trade my diamond for something else because it goes dark in certain light. Do I wish it didn't do that? Yeah, sure. But I'm in love with how it performs 95% of the time, and that's good enough for me! And, who's to say that another diamond isn't going to do the same thing? I've been engaged/married before and have had an ideal cut .79 carat, then 1.0 carat diamond. This is my third diamond (new relationship) and I am 3 for 3 on diamonds going dark in the sun.
diamondseeker2006|1412701782|3763699 said:Only if you lined up a 3.9 with several that were under 2.0 would you really know if you really liked that one best. In addition, they would need to be viewed in multiple lighting and not just under jewelry store lights. A "good"cut diamond can look beautiful alone. But when compaired with ideal cuts, it probably wouldn't be the best appearing stone. People go in chain stores every day and buy diamond engagement rings that they think are beautiful. But unless the eye is familiar with ideal cut, most diamonds are going to look appealing in jewelry store lighting. Whether the stone looks as good when dirty or in other lighting is another matter.
Yours is still GIA XXX, so I am sure it is a nice stone! After you clean it, hopefully you'll see that it was just the dirty pavilion causing the haziness.
Oh, and most ideal cut stones go dark in certain lighting. Mine did that under kitchen spot lighting.
MelisendeDiamonds|1412702028|3763704 said:ChristineGreco|1412700983|3763687 said:I guess I thought that because so much emphasis is placed here on the HCA, and I thought I read that if two stones both score under 2, no one score is better than the other... But that is still only in the context of a rejection tool. Thank you both for clarifying. Being that I selected my diamond in person, and thought it performed well, despite the 3.9 HCA score, do the angles/measurements have no redeeming qualities? Despite GIA triple ex and despite my eyes telling me the stone is beautiful... Those angles do not work well together??
1) Is your diamond dark in the pictures due to its proportions. (No not really its mostly to do with the lighting)
2) Is your diamond dark and speckled due to the SI2 inclusions. (No not likely but its worth checking it out with an independent appraiser if you are concerned and still have the option to return).
3) Does the diamond's angles work well together? (Yes of course they do its a GIA Excellent cut, it isn't the pinnacle of cut proportions but that doesn't matter if you compared it to other well cut diamonds under multiple lighting conditions and under light you would normally view your diamonds in.)
4) Will the diamond have a little bit less life on the edge of the table? (Yes it probably will but nothing major or worth worrying about if you like how it performs everywhere except in strong sunlight. You would likely not notice unless you compared it side by side to other diamonds of higher cut quality.)
ChristineGreco|1412702839|3763710 said:diamondseeker2006|1412701782|3763699 said:Only if you lined up a 3.9 with several that were under 2.0 would you really know if you really liked that one best. In addition, they would need to be viewed in multiple lighting and not just under jewelry store lights. A "good"cut diamond can look beautiful alone. But when compaired with ideal cuts, it probably wouldn't be the best appearing stone. People go in chain stores every day and buy diamond engagement rings that they think are beautiful. But unless the eye is familiar with ideal cut, most diamonds are going to look appealing in jewelry store lighting. Whether the stone looks as good when dirty or in other lighting is another matter.
Yours is still GIA XXX, so I am sure it is a nice stone! After you clean it, hopefully you'll see that it was just the dirty pavilion causing the haziness.
Oh, and most ideal cut stones go dark in certain lighting. Mine did that under kitchen spot lighting.
Thank you!! I did line this diamond with two others scoring 1.7 and picked this one. I took them outside and observed them in sunlight although not direct sun. And these pictures were taken under my kitchen spot lighting! I appreciate your help!! Thank you again.
HappyNewLife|1412727544|3763976 said: