1.53ct Asscher cut ring - Opinions please...

[asscher]

My husband bought a new setting for my wedding ring. It's a 1.53 carat asscher set in a pave ring with two princess cut sidestones and square detailing along the sides. Complimented by a wedding ring pave band with round stones. It's not as petite in the width as I'm use to, but it certainly sparkles more than my other band. What do you think? Does it look too big for my hand (the width of the ring)? I'm thinking of exchanging it for a skinnier band...but love the detailing on this ring.

 

[D&T]

I love the profile intricacy of the setting. Its a pretty ring, but I feel that your asscher does get lost in the setting though. However, this is your set, and we have different taste, If you love it, that is all that matters, not my opinion

 

[slg47]

I agree with D&T that it seems like your beautiful asscher is overwhelmed by the setting.

 

[Envyme]

I do agree with the others. I think it is a nice setting...however I think that there is so much metal showing on the profile and I think your beautiful diamond gets lost in it a bit. If you can exchange it and you are having second thoughts...I would have a look at some other settings. But, you are the one wearing it and if you love it then that is truly what is important.

 

[Andelain]

I've got to agree with the others about the setting. Plus it looks uncomfortable to wear.

 

[pixgirl]

I agree with the other posters - your beautiful stone is lost in the setting and it does look uncomfortable.

 

[zoebartlett]

Since you asked...

I do think it's a bit big, but I tend to like e-rings and wedding bands to be roughly (or exactly) the same width. That's just my opinion though.

Have you asked your husband if he minds you exchanging the ring?

ETA: Here's an idea. What about wearing your e-ring on your left hand without the wedding band? You could wear your wedding band as a right hand ring.

 

[PinkTower]

Since you asked...

I do think it's a bit big, but I tend to like e-rings and wedding bands to be roughly (or exactly) the same width. That's just my opinion though.

Have you asked your husband if he minds you exchanging the ring?

ETA: Here's an idea. What about wearing your e-ring on your left hand without the wedding band? You could wear your wedding band as a right hand ring.

If your husband does not want the ring exchanged, or if you love the new ring and want to keep it, have you considered wearing the eternity on a different hand?

 

[OCmom3xboys]

Please re-post pics without the band...asscher might stand out more a bit.

 

[DearBuddha]

I think it is a beautiful setting, but I think the thickness of the band doesn't do the asscher itself any justice. Like others have said, it seems to be a bit overshadowed by everything going on in the band.

Still, it is beautiful, and if you like it, enjoy it If you don't, would DH be hurt over a discussion of exchanging the setting for something else?

 

[NOYFB]

I have to agree with the others. Your beautiful asscher is not getting the attention it deserves with that setting. IMO, it is very pretty, but also very "busy". I think a large colored stone in that setting would be more appropriate.

 

[marcy]

I have to agree with everyone else. Your gorgeous asscher doesn't stand out on it's own and I don't think that setting would be very comfortable to wear.

 

[asscher]

Thank you to everyone who commented on my posting!!! I did love this setting, but after a week of wearing it, the size/width of the engagement band was not growing on me. I'm posting a couple pics of a new setting I'm considering and would love any input. The dilemma is pleasing me and him. He'd like to see me in a 2 carat princess, but I like the look of the asscher. When we 1st bought the center stone, the cost was about the same. Setting prices have gone way up since then, and the problem with the last setting was that it didn't have sparkle to it (it had 2 tiny baguette sidestones) AND we could never find a matching wedding band.

My husband did get his feelings hurt when I explained the reason for my wanting to exchange... Anyhow, please let me know your thoughts because this is the last time I'll be getting a setting and want to make sure I get it right = it's a sparkler for him, but still shows off the beautiful asscher cut diamond I have! Thanks again.

The photos I'm loading aren't the best quality, but I did learn that these are higher quality diamonds. And I would be buying an engagement ring w/ 2 wedding bands (one on each side) to add the extra sparkle but still feel petite. The photos don't show the extra or 3rd band that would go on the top side of the setting...

 

[marcy]

Asscher, the new rings are very pretty too. I think they still might distract from your gorgeous asscher. What about a solitaire mounting with a thin diamond band? I know what you mean about finding something that both of you like. Have your browsed through the asscher and emerald cut thread - you might see some different settings that both of you like. Good luck.

 

[PinkTower]

Asscher, the new rings are very pretty too. I think they still might distract from your gorgeous asscher. What about a solitaire mounting with a thin diamond band? I know what you mean about finding something that both of you like. Have your browsed through the asscher and emerald cut thread - you might see some different settings that both of you like. Good luck.

I agree w/Marcy! Keep it simple and the stone will make the statement. Also, there appears to be a gap between the center stone and the sidestones on the setting you posted, that is not pleasing.

Your stone in a solitaire with a simple eternity band would be a knockout.

 

[mochakeyes]

Beautiful Ring!!! Don't Change It!!!!!!!!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I'll have to join the crowd and say that the setting takes away from your diamond. And I'd also say to your husband that this ring is for you to wear and enjoy and you should get what YOU like! You'll find around here that most people want to highlight their center stone, and putting wide bands or a diamond shank e-ring with 2 diamond wedding bands is going to make the center stone blend into the bling. If your goal is maximum bling, then that is fine. But if you want a more elegant look for your asscher, then you might want to look a little more. In fact, do some searches on this forum for asscher settings to give you some ideas.

Oh, and the second setting looks like it is designed for a round stone. I really don't see an asscher looking great in that, either. Sorry!

 

[slg47]

yeah I don't like the 'gap' in the 2nd setting between the side stones and the center stone. I think it would awkward and agree with DS that it looks like it was designed for a round or oval diamond and not an asscher. Maybe browse the asscher thread to get some inspiration? If you like a more blingy setting I think a channel set cathedral setting could be lovely, or maybe a 3-sided pave band (would need spacer band if you wanted to wear wedding band on same finger).

ETA here is the asscher/EC thread
[URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/emerald-cuts-asschers-a-collection.113993/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/emerald-cuts-asschers-a-collection.113993/[/URL]

also get what YOU like, not what all of us like you are the one wearing the ring!

 

[kenny]

How about a setting with nothing else but a couple side stones that are either asscher, emerald cut or traps?

To me the distinctive pattern of the asscher goes best with these or an asscher can certainly stand on its own in a solitaire.
Plus that leaves more budget for the main diamond.

 

[Autumnovember]

Asscher, the new rings are very pretty too. I think they still might distract from your gorgeous asscher. What about a solitaire mounting with a thin diamond band? I know what you mean about finding something that both of you like. Have your browsed through the asscher and emerald cut thread - you might see some different settings that both of you like. Good luck.

I agree w/Marcy! Keep it simple and the stone will make the statement. Also, there appears to be a gap between the center stone and the sidestones on the setting you posted, that is not pleasing.

Your stone in a solitaire with a simple eternity band would be a knockout.

Agreed! Sometimes less is MORE. When I first looked at the ring my eyes didn't know where to focus and when they did, they went to the band not the center stone.... any others you're considering?

 

[slg47]

OK well I have been browsing the asscher thread since I linked it and here are some of my personal favorites that are more on the blingy side.

acebruin (would also look lovely with a white diamond halo!)


brown eyed country girl


starry eyed (love split shank for an asscher!)

 

[asscher]

I agree, the pictured photos of the second setting do have a gap between the sidestones, but the prongs are set for a 1.0 carat and my 1.5 stone would fill-in any of the gaps. I like the 2nd ring setting I posted best because it has some type of side profile which builds up to the center stone. But from the top view, the centerstone is still mainstage. I too wouldn't usually pick out round sidestones, but on this set they were so small, that I thought it wouldn't detract from the centerstone since it really only accents it from the profile view.

Secondly, I was originally drawn to the Asscher cut after trying on a 2.0 carat Cartier ring that was mounted on a simple diamond eternity band w/ matching second band. That was 6 years ago and the 55k ring wasn't in our budget, so we instead invested in the 1.53 Asscher centerstone and went with the simple baguette style band as pictured below.

Long story short, my 1.5 carat is a very deep cut diamond and now after wearing the baguette style, I'm ready for a little more bling to set it off. I was drawn to the halo style w/ diamonds that wrap around the center stone, but all the settings I've tried on so far are too small to fit my diamond OR the halo effect makes it look too big for my hand. I think I may have to do a custom piece!

Thanks everyone for taking time to read and comment on this. In the end, we're just looking for a stunning ring and right now it seems the 1.5 asscher doesn't quite do it for the hubby and I need a setting with a little more sparkle.

 

[lknvrb4]

I like your original set the best, I feel the other ones take away from your center stone.

 

[marymm]

OP - I too prefer your original setting - it is lovely and elegant and a whole lot of presence IMO. If I did anything, maybe I'd rotate the head on your original setting so that the Asscher is set kite-style. Either way, I'd stay with the Asscher in its original setting and invest in a pair of thin delicate Eternity bands that alternate rounds and square-cuts, and that will up your sparkle factor. And, your Asscher is a beautiful stone - have fun with your project!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Oh, gosh, I love the asscher with baguettes as well! But if that is not big enough, I'd get Steven Kirsch to do a halo setting. Gypsy should be getting hers back any day and you can see what his asscher halo looks like. I love all the settings slg posted, too. And if my husband told me he thought I should change to a setting he liked, I'd tell him that I'll pick out his next car, and perhaps that would get him to be quiet!

 

[dani13]

LOL, DS!!!!!

Asscher- I too agree with the others- I think both of the settings you chose are just too busy- you can hardly see the center diamond in there!!!!

If you want more bling- definitely do a halo!!! I have a friend with a gorgeous asscher in a halo setting and its stunning!!!!
And if you need suggestions for halo settings please just ask!!!!! We are happy to help!!!!

 

[dani13]

Here are a few halo suggestions:

[URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/beverley-k-asscher-halo-upgrade-finally-yay.137969/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/beverley-k-asscher-halo-upgrade-finally-yay.137969/[/URL]

[URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/glistens-asscher-halo-engagement-ring.153896/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/glistens-asscher-halo-engagement-ring.153896/[/URL]

This is a stunning halo setting (and you can also order it with the 2 matching bands for either side!!!): http://www.jamesallen.com/designer-jewelry/meno-collection-by-danhov/Platinum-ME2-Engagement-Ring.html


And I adore luvbug's asscher halo: [URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/engaged-my-yummy-asscher-halo.92871/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/engaged-my-yummy-asscher-halo.92871/[/URL]

 

[Autumnovember]

I was drawn to the halo style w/ diamonds that wrap around the center stone, but all the settings I've tried on so far are too small to fit my diamond OR the halo effect makes it look too big for my hand.

hmmm..I think that the newest set looks TOO big on your hand though. Overwhelming, in my opinion. I also like your original set the best.

 

[MrsDubDeez]

I think a pave solitaire mount with two matching bands would look stunning with your center Asscher. With the widths on each band being 2.5m, hopefully they won't overwhelm. The settings are from Roseco, which any jeweler should be able to get.





I have the plain version of this setting and it's SO comfy and very flattering on the hand. Hopefully one day DH will let me upgrade to this pave version

 

[asscher]

Okay, I took back the big overwhelminly sparkly setting and started my search for a new one. I think I've found the one! I fell in love with this setting because I think the bezel set mounting is stunning for framing and focusing your eye on the asscher cut.

The setting is made by A. Jaffe. I'm waiting to hear back from the company on the cost and whether or not they will make it to fit an assher versus an emerald. It's a halo ring with three tier pavé set accents. Too me, it kinda looks like a bee hive design that wraps around the diamond. I didn't like this at first, but after trying on tons of other settings, this mounting is the only one that gave me the wow feeling. It is very elegant and clean looking, not too sparkly.

Thanks everyone for commenting!