PaulaW
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2003
- Messages
- 632
----------------
On 7/9/2004 11:15:44 AM fire&ice wrote:
Our vote does count. I saw the results of our Supervisor race. The guy I voted for literally won by 6 or so votes. My husband & I being two of them. Aside from the fact that he was the incumbent & I have no complaints, I voted for him because he always knocks on our door, introduces himself & gives us a pen! Not a very intellectual reason; but, I like a politician who speaks to the regular folk.
Though I think it is our civic duty to learn the candidates platform, I think it's elitest to say that one shouldn't vote if not informed. Informed by WHO? Fox news? The National Review? CNN? The Village Voice? The guy on the bus taking you to the voting precints? Negative ads?
You know the reason why I lean towards the 'he's not Bush' candidate. All these things happened on G. Bush's watch. I'm not debating that it's his fault. But, I do take the stance that this guy is not lucky.
the whole debacle that was the Election
911
Antrax
War in Afganistan
Virtual Meltdown in the Stock Market
Enron,worldcom,etc.-loss of confidence in the sys.
Failing Economy
Exporting of jobs
Neo Conservatism a la Wolfolwich (sp?)
War in Iraq
Severe deficit spending
Scary mounting debt
Erosion of the Women's right to choose
And, Reality TV Shows(some of which I admittedly watch)
Again, not blaming him. But, at a certain point, I've got to think, at the very least, this guy is unlucky.
BTW, I have not decided who I am voting for. But, in my mind, this is a valid reason to not vote for Bush. I've been with the Devil for 4 years. Things haven't been good.
I would have voted for a Gephart/Kerry ticket. But, I *hate* Edwards. Funny, I don't see how Kerry thinks he will have some influence in the South. NC feels deserted by this guy. Even my staunchest Demo friends feel betrayed by Edwards.
Wow, I'm feeling rather political today.
----------------
----------------
Both the Election and the Failing Economy/Fall of the Stock Market were on Clinton's watch. These facts are conviently forgotten by most people.
----------------
----------------
On 7/28/2004 4:52:50 PM Rank Amateur wrote:
"Both the Election and the Failing Economy/Fall of the Stock Market were on Clinton's watch. These facts are conviently forgotten by most people."
----------------
----------------
On 7/29/2004 5:39:49 PM Rank Amateur wrote:
Anthrax? Tough to pin that on Bush, even for the coldest of hearts.
Hows that?
----------------
----------------
On 7/29/2004 5:39:49 PM Rank Amateur wrote:
Erosion of Women's Right to Choose. Tough one. Limits on the whens and hows of abortion are a good thing. I am not up on this issue to know where it stands, nor do I know what GWB has done regarding this. I presume you can still get one if you make up you mind early enough. Doctors don't like to do them and I don't blame them one bit.
Hows that?
----------------
----------------
On 7/29/2004 4:12:55 PM daboyzmomi wrote:
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
Amendment XIV
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
----------------
i know for whom i'm voting, but i think this thread is inappropriate for pricescope.
----------------
i know for whom i'm voting, but i think this thread is inappropriate for pricescope.
----------------
----------------
On 7/30/2004 11:32:38 AM Icicles wrote:
The reason we (speaking for middle-class America) pay so much taxes is because the upper-class don't pay enough. There are too many loopholes they can go thru, and we're paying for it.
----------------
----------------
On 7/30/2004 11:32:38 AM Icicles wrote:
The reason we (speaking for middle-class America) pay so much taxes is because the upper-class don't pay enough. There are too many loopholes they can go thru, and we're paying for it.
In his speech, Kerry said that he will be lowering taxes for middle class, and raising it for the richest of America. He will be closing the loopholes so that money stops leaking out. I don't know if he'll be able to do it, but that's enough to get my vote. ----------------
----------------
On 7/30/2004 12:38:54 PM Rank Amateur wrote:
You have it backwards. The reason the middle class pays so LITTLE in taxes is that the high wage earners pay so MUCH. Look at the statistics rather than taking a politician on his word. I paid NO federal income tax last year - and most would consider me middle class. Get you facts straight or simply admit to your class envy and be done with it.
----------------
Perhaps you are an exception. Not everybody has the option of not paying Fed. Taxes. I make close to 6 figures and I pay a ton of taxes... roughly 30%! Most people i know get taxed about the same. No Federal taxes? i need to do what you do!
Looking at statistics isn't enough. There's always a way to get out of paying taxes, and your statistics will never show it. I just posted an example about my friend's parents.
and yes, i do have class envy. I want to make millions a year!
----------------
On 7/30/2004 10:26:43 AM fire&ice wrote:
----------------We really are polarized in this country.---------------
So true. And how many times did Bush say, "I'm a uniter, not a divider" in the 2000 election?
He also said, repeatedly, that he would not allow the U.S. Military to engage in "nation building." No way he would follow Clinton's foray into nation building (in the Balkans), he said. He was very passionate on this point and I agreed with him wholeheartedly.
I liked Bush in 2000 and I voted him. But the candidate I voted for is not the president we got. WMD's aside, Bush has proven to be completely unreliable.
----------------
On 7/29/2004 11:55:44 PM Rank Amateur wrote:
After hearing his acceptance speech tonight, I am now voting for Kerry.----------------
----------------
On 7/30/2004 12:49:17 PM Icicles wrote:
----------------
----------------
On 7/30/2004 1:22:33 PM Greg wrote:
----------------
On 7/30/2004 10:26:43 AM fire&ice wrote:
----------------We really are polarized in this country.---------------
So true. And how many times did Bush say, 'I'm a uniter, not a divider' in the 2000 election?
He also said, repeatedly, that he would not allow the U.S. Military to engage in 'nation building.' No way he would follow Clinton's foray into nation building (in the Balkans), he said. He was very passionate on this point and I agreed with him wholeheartedly.
I liked Bush in 2000 and I voted him. But the candidate I voted for is not the president we got. WMD's aside, Bush has proven to be completely unreliable.----------------
I tend to agree with you.
Who knows. Maybe 9/11 changed him. Maybe his platform wasn't really his.
----------------
On 7/30/2004 5:52:00 PM fire&ice wrote:
----------------I tend to agree with you.----------------
I wonder where the candidates stand on the visual effects of mb fluorescence?
----------------
On 7/30/2004 6:58:38 PM Greg wrote:
----------------
On 7/30/2004 5:52:00 PM fire&ice wrote:
----------------I tend to agree with you.----------------
I wonder where the candidates stand on the visual effects of mb fluorescence?----------------
The one I vote for must be observant enough to notice the effect.