A kind of weird combination, your thoughts?

[hawaii2012]

Hello everyone,

I happened to find a diamond with this weird combination (maybe it is not weird actually, but it IS to me since I am such a newbie in this field)

1.77carat, HCA 1.0(4EX)
actual dimensions : 7.88-7.92x4.74mm
Proportions
Depth: 59.9%
Table: 58%
Crown Angle: 33.5°
Crown Height: 14%
Pavilion Angle: 41°
Pavilion Depth: 43.5%
Star Length: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
Girdle: Thin to Medium, Faceted (3.0%)
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None

The combination of depth and table seems very unusual to me. Though HCA looks so great, I am quite worried about it's fire. It has such a big table, and might do a poor job in being fiery which I care most. I DO want to buy a blingbling sparkly stone than a one which looks big but no fire. What is your thoughts? Really appreciate your reply!

 

[JulieN]

Should be fine. 58% is really not "such a big table."

 

[04diamond<3]

looks good to me! Maybe a bit shallow, but a 1.0 on the HCA is definitely something I'd keep!

 

[hawaii2012]

Thanks guys for your replies! What is your opinion on it's fire? Is there any big possibility for it to be very shining?

 

[yssie]

It's not weird - numbers are just fine, by the numbers it promises to be a bright and sparkly stone Post the IS.