Chrono said:The problem is that the nicest emeralds photograph very poorly...
Chrono|1409063967|3739495 said:SparkliesLuver|1409063869|3739492 said:Chrono said:Budget and mm size?
<a class="vglnk" title="Link added by VigLink" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.embassyemeralds.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&manufacturers_id=&products_id=577"><span>http</span><span>://</span><span>www</span><span>.</span><span>embassyemeralds</span><span>.</span><span>com</span><span>/</span><span>index</span><span>.</span><span>php</span><span>?</span><span>main</span><span>_</span><span>page</span><span>=</span><span>product</span><span>_</span><span>info</span><span>&</span><span>manufacturers</span><span>_</span><span>id</span><span>=&</span><span>products</span><span>_</span><span>id</span><span>=</span><span>577</span></a>
By the way, that one is gorgeous. The color and clarity are superb. I feel like it's missing that bluish green tint though that I had my heart set on. Or is it just my eyes? I should consider all at this point, though.
The blue is there.
SparkliesLuver|1409077772|3739609 said:No apologies needed; I was just curious. Oh, really? I'm anxious to hear what your plans are.
SparkliesLuver|1409078302|3739614 said:Ok, everyone. Here's where I need your advice as well. I've uploaded two different Colombian emeralds with WAY different prices. Why on earth are these so different? I understand the size difference but there has to be more to it than that. Please explain! And which do you prefer?
First two pictures are of Emerald 1:
1.63 cts
7.1mm x 6.9 x 5.1
Price is more than $7k
Second two pictures are of Emerald 2:
.46 ct
4.39mm x 4.25
Price is $920
SparkliesLuver|1409142629|3740022 said:I suppose that makes sense. So at that point, you'd buy the stone, have it tested, and go from there.
SparkliesLuver|1409139778|3740001 said:No, they are from different vendors. Emerald 2 is the one you suggested from EE. Both have been oiled only with cedar oil. I'm not sure of the level. Sorry. What are the typical levels?
I have more pictures of Emerald 1, I think. I'm not paying $7k for it, so I don't mind sharing more...if you want.
TL|1409078387|3739616 said:SparkliesLuver|1409077772|3739609 said:No apologies needed; I was just curious. Oh, really? I'm anxious to hear what your plans are.
I have a setting for it already that's been sitting around empty for years. I have to get to the jeweler and have it set finally. I had another Muzo emerald in a platinum setting, but the jeweler chipped the side It's between 1 and 2 carats, but I forget the actual size. I think 1.5 cts, but not sure.
Be really careful who you use to set emeralds, and NEVER EVER let them put it in an ultrasonic cleaner or steam cleaner. A lot of jewelers will clean them after setting, and those are the two cleaning machines of choice usually. Be especially careful if you set one in platinum as it is such a hard metal. I had another jeweler chip an emerald in a platinum setting at a gem show too.
Unless you have a superb jeweler, I would go with high karat gold to set an emerald.
SparkliesLuver|1411733074|3757268 said:Chrono (and others), I don't remember this treatment being on your "acceptable" list. Thoughts?
"This stone has been treated with a newer patented processes known as ExCel. This is a reversible treatment that allows the emerald to be ultrasonically or steam cleaned. The ExCel process carries a lifetime guarantee. It is the currently the best emerald treatment on the market and hailed as superior to oil by most major gemological laboratories."
http://www.litnon.com/index.php?page=viewgem&id=209
SparkliesLuver|1411733074|3757268 said:Chrono (and others), I don't remember this treatment being on your "acceptable" list. Thoughts?
"This stone has been treated with a newer patented processes known as ExCel. This is a reversible treatment that allows the emerald to be ultrasonically or steam cleaned. The ExCel process carries a lifetime guarantee. It is the currently the best emerald treatment on the market and hailed as superior to oil by most major gemological laboratories."
http://www.litnon.com/index.php?page=viewgem&id=209