shape
carat
color
clarity

are you in favorite of a flat % income tax ?...

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
To ame, and others who want to know how the tax system basically works.

Please note that I have only skimmed some of the preceeding post, so gently let me know if I''ve mistated things.

ame: I understand you are angry. You have a right to be angry. So are others.

However, what follows is the basics of how the tax system is structured.

There are basically 4 different tax codes in the US based on the following classifications:

-- Employee

-- Self Employed (small business, perhaps a small number of employees)

-- Business (larger business with many employees and stockholders)

-- Investors

I will note that many people cross these boundries, but are often mainly in one catagory. For example, I am an employee, who is also self employed in a small business.

Each group is treated totally different.

The worst taxed group is the employee. An employee largly can only save or invest in after tax dollars.

The governement provides tax breaks for the Self Employeed and Business, because they want business''s to succeed. A simple fact is that virtually every job in america is paid for from operating business''s. Business''s have employees - and pay all the wages of those employees, and have business profits. Those wages and business profits are taxed to support government positions (while government wages are also taxed this is just a partial recycle of the original money that came from a business). Investors set up investment bussiness, and successfull ones make a profit and have to pay taxes. With the exception of import duties - all other money in america comes from businesses. That is why the the government grants tax breaks to a business - because it, and the american economy is dependent on them.

Investors are a special form of business - and often lubricate the formation of new business or new products. Thus, they get some breaks as well as the business of america is business (unfortunately, the schools don''t normally teach this).

Even charities get all of their money from businesses either directly or through the employees.

The self employed have one set of tax benifits.

The bigger Business has another set of tax benifits.

Depending on what you are producing, depends on where the best tax breaks are.

A self employed person who is in a service industry (plumber, painter, Dr, etc) is actually fairly highly taxed (many of the previous tax breaks were taken away a decade or so ago).

A self employed person who is selling products or services provided by others gets many more tax breaks.

If you need large capital equipment you are usually better off in the structure of a Business where eveyone is an employee and there are stockholders.

The employee is part of what a Business needs to succeed, and they have no inherent econominc advantage to the government (the US used to run just fine when there were relatively few Businesses, and most people were Self Employed).

Thus, the employee bears the brunt of the tax code. They have no leverage.

Concerning your concept that starting a business is not easy. You are again right - in a way.

Actually, starting one is very easy because the government wants you to be in business as it creats jobs and taxes in the economy.

The tough part is learning how to make a profit.

The hardest thing is that people have to learn to think and act diferently. The school system trains you to be employees. Not a business person. Most people don''t have a clue what to do because they were never taught.

If the schools taught business (and not MBA type business which is just another class of employee), but really the hows and whys of presentation, marketing, profit, book-keeping, etc I suspect that many more people would be in their own business instead of being an employee.

But they teach you to be an employee because that is what Business needs. employees. Where does most of the tax money originate from. Business. Why was the higher level public education system really started (beyond simple reading and basic math: what most students can do by 4th grade). (check the history on this if you wonder) = because business needed educated employees for the factories (note that Jr Hi and High schools only sprung up where there were factories). Very few people got a college education - and you could get into college with the equivelent of todays 5th grade education - if you could afford it (they were expensive and private).

Remember, get a good education and get a good job. Isn''t that what the schools teach. The only problem is that the system is not very successfull. Very few people can retire from a job and live a good life. The reason is that jobs are set up to allow your employer to suceed and as a tax base for the government.

The minute that the employer stops making money from what you do - is the minute that your job ended (although in today''s parlance they might have you hang arround for a bit while they figure out a "proper" way to let you go).

So you have a right to be mad.

The only solution that I found was that I had to learn to go into business for myself. You have to be willing to learn to change to succeed. You have to accept that you will probably fail - and learn to fall forward and pick yourself up. I have come a long way, and have a way''s to go yet. Fortunately, if you are interested there are a number of sources of information on how to learn to succeed in business. Be it the local Chamber of Commerce (trust me- they want more business''s in the area), business development groups, or some of the better multileve organizations (the better organizations do have great training programs - which often take years to get through that you can apply anywhere). Of course, there are a lot of junk programs - and junk multilevels out there. be highly sceptical of getting education from someone or some orgainzation that cannot show you that they have succeeded in business. Why is it that most business schools are staffed with people who have never run a business in their life, or a few people who failed and ran back to be on staff.

Anyway, I hope I have helped explain the system to you.

If your an employee and mad at the sytem. Then I encourage you to step out and start learning about how to build your own business. I have learned more lessons of life by doing that than anyting I have ever learned on the day job.

Perry
 
Date: 8/4/2005 10:39:24 PM
Author: aljdewey
Date: 8/4/2005 9:31:19 PM

Author: ame


If you want to take issue with personal attacks, at least acknowledge both sides of this. You seem to only be focusing on one side of the issue. Sure, I shouldn''t have stooped to her level, but I did.

I''ve reread every post by both you and F&I in this thread just now, AME, and the personal attack began with you. You began the name calling with the fruit-loop comment, and the nasty ''you probably claim to be a Christian'' swipe. These were followed by calling her greedy, self-important, and a jaded old cow. All within the same thread.


Prior to that, the only comment F&I made was that you don''t have as much real-life experience. That''s likely a fact; being younger typically means less lived-through-it experience. No surprise there. Academic knowledge isn''t the same as having lived something, and that''s all ''real-life'' experience means. I''m sure F&I would concede she doesn''t have as much real-life experience as my father, considering he''s 15 years older than she. Saying so wouldn''t be a suggestion that she has *no* knowledge, or that the knowledge she has isn''t valid.....it just means that she hasn''t experienced as much first-hand. Age doesn''t necessarily equal wisdom, to be sure. That isn''t a personal attack. Vicious name calling is.


I''m sorry, but there isn''t ''another side'' to acknowledge. I''m not focusing on one side of the issue; I''m telling it like I see it. In my opinion, you WAY crossed the line. It''s one thing to disagree with another person''s point of view or ideology, and that''s fair game. It''s quite another to denigrate into name-calling and making it personal, and that was all you.
So your complaint is that I''m better at being insulting than she is, and although you''re perfectly comfortable with people telling you that your real life experience is trivial, and therefore your opinions are invalid without knowing you at all, I am not.
 
Perry, thank you for your perspective from the business-owner standpoint. I am suprisingly "comfortable" in my current spot...for once in my life.
 
Date: 8/5/2005 10:01:28 AM
Author: icekid
Agreed- as usual, Dave Atlas has provided us many wise words!


The thing that bothers be about the current taxation system is that it penalizes me for working hard.


I have worked my ass off to get into a good college, to get into medical school, to start a career. What do I have to show for it? I will graduate medical school ***$250,000*** in debt. Then I will ''volunteer'' my services during residency, while making a solid $3 per hour. You try paying back a quater of a million dollars making less than minimum wage.


By the time I am 35, I might have my first job making more than 35 grand/ year. And yes, I should donate 40% of my HARD earned cash to others. That''s why I worked so hard- so I could provide for the whole country, in addition to my own family.

Icekid, I hate to break it to you, but you could make less than a dollar an hour during residency (depending on what you do). My husband is a surgery resident and I did a spreadsheet to figure out his take-home pay per hour and it was depressing. I wish I hadn''t done it! But, I don''t know of any surgical programs which follow the 80 hour a week rule. I think that programs like Family Practice DO follow the rule, so then the figure might be higher ;). Sorry to depress you!
 
Date: 8/5/2005 11:02:06 PM
Author: ame

So your complaint is that I'm better at being insulting than she is, and although you're perfectly comfortable with people telling you that your real life experience is trivial, and therefore your opinions are invalid without knowing you at all, I am not.
No, that's not my complaint. My complaint is that your insults are PERSONAL. C'mon, a woman of your intelligence really can do much better than calling someone a jaded cow.

FYI....she didn't say your real-life experience was trivial; she said (in essence) that it was limited----as in short of quantity. That's not a qualitative comment, but a quantitative comment which happens to be true. My real-life experience is little when compared to someone 10 or 20 years my senior......no insult there, either. It's fact. Real-life experience is LIVED experiences......not theorhetical, but actually lived.

However, there is positively NO factual basis for calling someone a cow.....she is not, in fact a cow, and resembles nothing of the kind. Degrading into name-calling diminishes the strength of your argument in my opinion.
 
I think "real life" experience is loosly based on age; and the older a person gets the farther it can deveiat from actual age.

Yes there are some maturity issues that comes from simply aging.

However, someone who has spent their life doing the same thing day after day - year after year, and operating in essentially (if not actually) a closed world does not gain much if any real life experience with aging.

Someone who actively engages themselves in other issues, other cultures, other activities, travels, does things with other people can gain real life experience that is very significant in a farily small number of years (5-10 years will make them a totally different person).

Real life experinece is very important. Too bad there are so many people who don''t really want to gain it (it means doing something different - and taking chances).


Perry
 
Date: 8/6/2005 9:13:59 AM
Author: aljdewey

Date: 8/5/2005 11:02:06 PM
Author: ame

So your complaint is that I''m better at being insulting than she is, and although you''re perfectly comfortable with people telling you that your real life experience is trivial, and therefore your opinions are invalid without knowing you at all, I am not.
No, that''s not my complaint. My complaint is that your insults are PERSONAL. C''mon, a woman of your intelligence really can do much better than calling someone a jaded cow.

FYI....she didn''t say your real-life experience was trivial; she said (in essence) that it was limited----as in short of quantity. That''s not a qualitative comment, but a quantitative comment which happens to be true. My real-life experience is little when compared to someone 10 or 20 years my senior......no insult there, either. It''s fact. Real-life experience is LIVED experiences......not theorhetical, but actually lived.

However, there is positively NO factual basis for calling someone a cow.....she is not, in fact a cow, and resembles nothing of the kind. Degrading into name-calling diminishes the strength of your argument in my opinion.

ame felt insulted and responded in kind. remarks directed at her were ''personal'' in discounting her research and opinion formed based on that research...and trying to talk to her like a child and stating that she had no experience, did not know what she was talking about, and was just plain wrong was not taking part in a ''discussion'' and/or ''debate''. she took it personal. she provided facts and figures; the proper response was to reply in kind. what goes around, comes around. personal is personal period.

as regards the original topic and i quote from a post, "Capitalism is what allows people to make as much money as they can and no one should not be penalized for that."

but is it really capitalism when taxpayer dollars are used to finance research, taxpayer dollars that are used to give write offs for doing business outside the US proper, taxpayer dollars that are used to pay for retirement plans that go bust because corporations don''t set aside enough $$$, taxpayer dollars that are used to prop up the savings and loan industry, etc.?


we are an over 6 figure household and i can say i don''t mind paying taxes: anyone remember public educatiion, public health, public roads, etc.?! all these things helped us to become a 6 figure household.


i don''t mind the stereotype of the welfare mama getting a few of my tax dollars but it makes me madder than hell that the corporations walk away with billions of taxpayer dollars. don''t tell me that they provide jobs here in this country....they''re off shoring every chance they get...and they''re doing it on our tax dollars. used to be ''just'' blue collar workers but they''re hitting into the ''middle class'' now, too: cpa''s, programmers, etc.


corporations want all the privlege of capitalism and none of the responsibilities: they want an educated work force but don''t want to pay taxes, they want our tax dollars for r&d but don''t want to pay taxes, they want public roads to transport their goods but they don''t want to pay taxes, they want they want they want....and they get and they get and they get. corporations no longer want to assume risk; they want we the taxpayers to assume it for them.

checkout Cabala''s Inc., a giant retailer of hunting, fishing, and other outdoor products. Before building a megastore in Texas, they demanded and got government subsidies of $600K in cash, $36M in road and construction costs, and another $20 M in highway improvements. Lots of Texas taxpayer money to an out of state corp brought in to compete against local business that ARE TAXED TO PAY FOR CABALA''S SUBSIDY! in otherwords, these local businesses are paying taxes that bring in a business that will ultimately put them out of business. Cabala loves corporate welfare so much it even declares in its annual report that getting PUBLIC MONEY is key to its business plan. A PRIVATE CORPORATION FUNDED BY THE STATE TO GIVE IT A LEG UP ON ITS LOCAL COMPETITORS IS NOT FREE ENTERPRISE NOR IS IT CAPITALISM: IT IS CORPORATE WELFARE!!!!

perhaps if the corporations were paying their fair share, we wouldn''t be having this discussion.....

peace, movie zombie
 
Dream on.

Big corporations and rich people have the power.
Every four years they install a governement (which we think we are electing) that preserves their comfy status quo.

They will never pay their share.
Why should they?
 
Hear hear!

(about the "electing" part)
 
I feel a conspiracy theory coming on.
 
Napoleon, give me some of your tots.
 
Date: 8/6/2005 3:29:26 PM
Author: kenny
Dream on.

Big corporations and rich people have the power.
Every four years they install a governement (which we think we are electing) that preserves their comfy status quo.

They will never pay their share.
Why should they?
You are right they pay their share plus yours. Otherwise we would not be able to support those who refuse to work and those who enter this country illegally.
 
Date: 8/6/2005 5:14:05 PM
Author: Matatora
Date: 8/6/2005 3:29:26 PM

Author: kenny

Dream on.


Big corporations and rich people have the power.

Every four years they install a governement (which we think we are electing) that preserves their comfy status quo.


They will never pay their share.

Why should they?
You are right they pay their share plus yours. Otherwise we would not be able to support those who refuse to work and those who enter this country illegally.
IN WHAT UNIVERSE?! Did you READ any of the posts I made or just ignore the facts posted in them. They don''t pay their share OR anyone else''s and they never will because no one makes them.
 
I read your post I just happen to think you are incorrect. I am entilted to my opinion. I know several people who feel paying 67% of their income to the gov means they are paying more then their share.
 
Date: 8/6/2005 5:14:05 PM
Author: Matatora

Date: 8/6/2005 3:29:26 PM
Author: kenny
Dream on.

Big corporations and rich people have the power.
Every four years they install a governement (which we think we are electing) that preserves their comfy status quo.

They will never pay their share.
Why should they?
You are right they pay their share plus yours. Otherwise we would not be able to support those who refuse to work and those who enter this country illegally.
yeah....like those who takes the welfare system and make it into a career.
29.gif
 
Date: 8/6/2005 5:39:29 PM
Author: Matatora
I read your post I just happen to think you are incorrect. I am entilted to my opinion. I know several people who feel paying 67% of their income to the gov means they are paying more then their share.


Then find some actual PROOF and evidence to disprove me and make your point. Yes, you are definitely entitled to your opinion but it seems like I am the only one showing any actual researched evidence/proof of any points in this discussion (which at least two of the folks who jumped on my "inexperienced" case demanded I do, not knowing or caring that my comment CAME FROM RESEARCH and was NOT unfounded or inaccurate).

Perhaps because no one else HAS any facts to share or has done any research or investigation into it.

Yes, DF, there are FAR too many folks milking the welfare system. And apparently our government isn''t interested in shutting them all down. And if it is the case that they are interested, it sure doesn''t show it.
 

i totally agree that those that take up the welfare system and make it into a career should be stopped! i''m so glad we all agree that welfare has to end: so let''s end corporate welfare now! corporate welfare is the biggest rip off to this economy and to our national treasury.

peace, movie zombie
 
20.gif

Date: 8/6/2005 5:27:26 PM
Author: ame

Date: 8/6/2005 5:14:05 PM
Author: Matatora

Date: 8/6/2005 3:29:26 PM

Author: kenny

Dream on.


Big corporations and rich people have the power.

Every four years they install a governement (which we think we are electing) that preserves their comfy status quo.


They will never pay their share.

Why should they?
You are right they pay their share plus yours. Otherwise we would not be able to support those who refuse to work and those who enter this country illegally.
IN WHAT UNIVERSE?! Did you READ any of the posts I made or just ignore the facts posted in them. They don''t pay their share OR anyone else''s and they never will because no one makes them.
So, Movie Z, still feel the same way? "ame felt insulted and responded in kind. remarks directed at her were ''personal'' in discounting her research and opinion formed based on that research...and trying to talk to her like a child and stating that she had no experience, did not know what she was talking about, and was just plain wrong was not taking part in a ''discussion'' and/or ''debate''. she took it personal. she provided facts and figures; the proper response was to reply in kind."

Gee, I wonder if you think Matatora might feel a bit insulted now? The comment above by AME suggests she can''t READ???? Gosh, is that really AME speaking to someone else like a child? What goes around comes around, indeed.

Matatora didn''t happen to agree with the "posts or facts" AME made (much like F&I didn''t), and she got blasted for it. Seems to be a trend.....if you don''t agree with what she says, personal attacks are the response. That''s not discourse.
 
Date: 8/6/2005 6:10:10 PM
Author: ame



Date: 8/6/2005 5:39:29 PM
Author: Matatora
I read your post I just happen to think you are incorrect. I am entilted to my opinion. I know several people who feel paying 67% of their income to the gov means they are paying more then their share.


Then find some actual PROOF and evidence to disprove me and make your point. Yes, you are definitely entitled to your opinion but it seems like I am the only one showing any actual researched evidence/proof of any points in this discussion.

Perhaps because no one else HAS any facts to share or has done any research or investigation into it.
Find some proof? Since WHEN was proof required to support an OPINION.

How about this: perhaps these folks aren't inclined to complete a full freakin thesis just to satisfy you. YOU want to research and "fact up".....go right ahead. Facts can be somewhat like statistics......if you quote the right source, you can make them say absolutely anything you want them to say.

This isn't a contest, for crying out loud. You can agree to disagree instead of acting like an insolent child if you don't "WIN".
 
Date: 8/6/2005 11:33:03 PM
Author: aljdewey
20.gif
[/i]Gee, I wonder if you think Matatora might feel a bit insulted now? The comment above by AME suggests she can''t READ???? Gosh, is that really AME speaking to someone else like a child? What goes around comes around, indeed.
At least quote me correctly. I didn''t say she COULDN''t I said she most likely DIDN''T.

BIG DIFFERENCE.

There isn''t anything "to win". It''s not a competition, you are correct, and Im not freaking out about agreement, people have every right to disagree. My point is that if you don''t agree, explain WHY. I was told I needed to explain my comment and do my research, I have and I did. No one else really bothered to. All I get is "YOU ARE WRONG" and "YOU NO (sic) NOT WHAT YOU SPEAK" and "GIVE ME A BREAK". No one bothered to intelligently explain their "side" of the discussion. Throwing out links that I don''t actually think were read before they were shown to me as reasonable research isn''t showing or explaining a side.
 
This is an unfortunate but typical example how an interesting topic can degrade into personal discord.

We think both F&I and Ame could have handled the situation much better. Each forum member should be more tactful on public forums to avoid offending anybody unintentionally.

Intentional attacks are not allowed here and will be deleted. This forum is not a place for the resolution of personal issues. Please keep your personal business as just that - personal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top