----------------
On 10/2/2003 9:02:41 AM winyan wrote:
Ah well, 6 women came out today and accused Arnold of being a 'serial groper'
But, in Cali, that prolly won't count for much. Besides, he's not a Dem.
----------------
They didn't "come out," the LA Times went to them. I normally like the Times but the timing of this really smells. The article says it was the result of a seven-week investigation--couldn't they have published a progress report instead of holding everything until 6 days before the election?
Not weeping.----------------
On 10/3/2003 10:03:35 AM AGBF wrote:
Well...the report was true. So now what do you say? Read Arnold's own words and weep!
----------------
----------------
On 9/26/2003 1:10:09 PM Mara wrote:
If you were in CA and saw the anti-Davis sentiment that flows around...you would see that it's an almost absolute certainty that Davis will be recalled. I don't see him staying in office under any circumstances, he's done way too much damage to the state and its inhabitants. ----------------
----------------
On 10/9/2003 10:11:28 AM fire&ice wrote:
The basic idea is true, though I'm not certain how accurate the 80% figure is. But essentially, the state is locked into spending more money than it's allowed to raise. I'm hoping Arnold will tackle this problem somehow, because it's at the root of our fiscal troubles. Some of the mandates are written into the state constitution, unfortunately.I heard today that 80% of the budget in mandated by law?Is this true? Can CA repeal some of the mandates? I don't think they can afford *not* to.
----------------
----------------
Comic Sans MS' size="2">I saw a quote in a paper yesterday about this entire thing..something like 'People are used to seeing Arnold as a larger than life action 'hero' who swoops in and saves the people!'....and I think that quote is dead on. /blockquote>
Yeah, I do think that is dead on. Funny thing, he's not that big - physcially. I saw the "tan androids"at Shows I was doing in LA. Tiny is a nice word for her. He is significantly shorter & smaller framed than my husband. He can't be much more than 5'8". I guess this surprised me.
That said, your comments were interesting. I've spent quite a bit of time in SF & LA visiting or working. It's *really* different. In some ways good. In some ways bad. In some ways just different. But then, I guess the same could be say about NYC or the crazy South.
I'm not a Democrat or a Republican. I'm closer to a Rockafeller Republican. I do follow politics more now than when I was in my 20's or 30's. I can tell you this - I *always* voted. If you don't vote, you don't have the right to b*tch about anything the Government does. It's a responsibility I take seriously.
Almost sounds like from your post that people 1. wanted a hero & 2. were so fed up that they wanted something *totally* different.
Oh well, I do wish you'all luck.
Edited to add: I think the 3 things were more like 1. win a body building competiton 2. make lots of money 3. rule the world. Anyone know for sure?
----------------
On 10/9/2003 2:26:32 PM LawGem wrote:
----------------
On 10/9/2003 10:11:28 AM fire&ice wrote:
The basic idea is true, though I'm not certain how accurate the 80% figure is. But essentially, the state is locked into spending more money than it's allowed to raise. I'm hoping Arnold will tackle this problem somehow, because it's at the root of our fiscal troubles. Some of the mandates are written into the state constitution, unfortunately.[/FONT][FONT=<BR]----------------
----------------
----------------
On 10/9/2003 4:30:36 PM fire&ice wrote:
Funny, I said to my husband that I thought some of the mandates were in your Consitution. He said, 'surely not'. What does CA have to do to repeal the mandates in the Const. Long hearings & a vote? What is the reasoning behind the mandated laws? Is it something customary to CA since it's statehood?
----------------
Amending the constitution requires a 2/3 vote of the Legislature followed by an election to ratify it, or just an initiative. Right now, I'm not sure you could get 2/3 of the California Legislature to agree on what day it is.