Hi All,
I have been on your forum for over a month reading up on diff aspects of diamond purchasing
, and have finally decided that some of the experts on here are more experienced than local jwlrs when it comes to knowledge, unbiased advice and stating an opinion, so here goes...
As a lady in waiting for almost 3 years I had ample time to figure out and decide what I liked/wanted when the time came and 2 yrs ago came across a blue irradiated diamond which was the most gorgeous intense shade of turquoise blue set in a ring and that has since then stuck with me (and my fiancé to be as I showed it to him at the time as well).
Ffwd to the moment of truth and we are now down to two options because whilst we are working to a strict budget (imposed by both him and me) I am also fond of big, chunky pieces of jwlry (loosely translated to expensive taste by some
) and looking for the right option has proven to be like finding a needle in a haystack!
So, as it stands currently, I am definitely looking for the following in rings:
colour: vivid fancy blue (teal/green blue/blue green)
cut: round brilliant
clarity: 'eye-clean' and 'sparkly' (I have seen this fit across many grades hence why kept the criteria flexible)
carat: 2.5 to 3.5 for the centre stone.
setting: halo (pref vintage)
The option of a natural blue diamond is obviously out of the question because they are extremely pricey and out of our budget, but also the actual colour we like is in treated diamonds only so yeay for us
I have so far narrowed it down to the following two options after exhaustive online research (local jwlrs did not have anything matching my description- most did not even know what an irradiated blue diamond was so we abandoned the search):
OPTION 1
http://jewelrybygaro.com/product/3-...ved-ring-14k-white-gold-handmade-unique-ring/
This was our first choice because the colour is perfect, as is the setting and everything else- but the only issue we've uncovered after requesting videos etc is that the clarity being as poor as it is, means the diamond does not 'sparkle' and is a cloudy (?) diamond
Since the above revelation, we have found another option:
OPTION 2
**edited by moderator** Liori Diamonds
This is a close second in colour, and the setting is still ok (not exactly what we liked but it'll do), is 'very-sparkly' as the video in the pics section demonstrates, but the catch is it's centre stone is clarity enhanced.
Now my questions are as follow:
-is option 1 overpriced and over-appraised owing to it's centre stone's clarity and how credible is a certification if it's issued by GAL?
-is option 2 a good proposition owing to the clarity enhancements it's undergone (durability, permanence, fragility) and is AGI a credible source of certification?
-will we be better off discarding both options and maybe going for a london blue topaz as the centre stone (it's the right shade and topaz is my birthstone-december)? ( but they def don't look as sparkly and my fiancé is against the idea of anything other than a diamond as the centre stone)
-will we be even better off looking for the stone itself and getting the ring made from scratch because we've inquired at local jwlrs and the setting we like can be made in under $1,000 with E-F, VS1 quality diamonds.
I can appreciate that sellers would price items based on demand but we def don't want to end up overpaying or buying something that isn't worth it in the long run- hence the dilemma...
Have had a look at your search option too (nothing there) and on DBL (nothing there in our budget that we liked) so pretty much at wits end on the subject
- any input at all will be appreciated!
Cheers!
I have been on your forum for over a month reading up on diff aspects of diamond purchasing
As a lady in waiting for almost 3 years I had ample time to figure out and decide what I liked/wanted when the time came and 2 yrs ago came across a blue irradiated diamond which was the most gorgeous intense shade of turquoise blue set in a ring and that has since then stuck with me (and my fiancé to be as I showed it to him at the time as well).
Ffwd to the moment of truth and we are now down to two options because whilst we are working to a strict budget (imposed by both him and me) I am also fond of big, chunky pieces of jwlry (loosely translated to expensive taste by some

So, as it stands currently, I am definitely looking for the following in rings:
colour: vivid fancy blue (teal/green blue/blue green)
cut: round brilliant
clarity: 'eye-clean' and 'sparkly' (I have seen this fit across many grades hence why kept the criteria flexible)
carat: 2.5 to 3.5 for the centre stone.
setting: halo (pref vintage)
The option of a natural blue diamond is obviously out of the question because they are extremely pricey and out of our budget, but also the actual colour we like is in treated diamonds only so yeay for us

I have so far narrowed it down to the following two options after exhaustive online research (local jwlrs did not have anything matching my description- most did not even know what an irradiated blue diamond was so we abandoned the search):
OPTION 1
http://jewelrybygaro.com/product/3-...ved-ring-14k-white-gold-handmade-unique-ring/
This was our first choice because the colour is perfect, as is the setting and everything else- but the only issue we've uncovered after requesting videos etc is that the clarity being as poor as it is, means the diamond does not 'sparkle' and is a cloudy (?) diamond
Since the above revelation, we have found another option:
OPTION 2
**edited by moderator** Liori Diamonds
This is a close second in colour, and the setting is still ok (not exactly what we liked but it'll do), is 'very-sparkly' as the video in the pics section demonstrates, but the catch is it's centre stone is clarity enhanced.
Now my questions are as follow:
-is option 1 overpriced and over-appraised owing to it's centre stone's clarity and how credible is a certification if it's issued by GAL?
-is option 2 a good proposition owing to the clarity enhancements it's undergone (durability, permanence, fragility) and is AGI a credible source of certification?
-will we be better off discarding both options and maybe going for a london blue topaz as the centre stone (it's the right shade and topaz is my birthstone-december)? ( but they def don't look as sparkly and my fiancé is against the idea of anything other than a diamond as the centre stone)
-will we be even better off looking for the stone itself and getting the ring made from scratch because we've inquired at local jwlrs and the setting we like can be made in under $1,000 with E-F, VS1 quality diamonds.
I can appreciate that sellers would price items based on demand but we def don't want to end up overpaying or buying something that isn't worth it in the long run- hence the dilemma...
Have had a look at your search option too (nothing there) and on DBL (nothing there in our budget that we liked) so pretty much at wits end on the subject

Cheers!