Obsessed
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2004
- Messages
- 104
Uncle Marty,
Lots of interesting things you've posted have reminded me of somethings i learned in school last year: Commodotization VS branding. It was insightful to hear that DTC is trying to encourage partnerships to sell branded diamonds. The truth is that a successful and profitable business industry is characterized by value addition, such as differentiation, service, AND BRANDING. Once an industry hits 'commodity' status, profits and all return on investment figures are very low. Conversely, sales volume large. It is interesting to note that some online vendors and journalists proclaim that diamonds ARE commodities, since then the industry MUST compete on low cost. If true commodiztization occurs, then many of these vendors will not survive the 'walmart' effect. But there seems to be opposing forces to the trend of commoditization: namely, reputation, technical skills, branding, and relative difficulty for consumers to thoroughly inspect product. I think the latter makes the diamond industry very unique. All though the diamond rough may very well be supply controlled comodity, the final product involves so many technical labor, inspection, and handling, which adds on costs... and each step presents an opportunity for value addition. So far, many respectable vendors have successfuly adapted to these changes and supplies us quality diamonds at lower costs. And they are differentiating themselves through providing education and service.(if diamonds are truly a commodity, then where is the need for education and service?
) Hence diamonds are NOT a commodity(note: abundant supply doesn't necessarily result in commoditization) and the brand names DO add value, since the general public(who are not so knowlegable as members of PS) rely on these brands for quality assurance rather than their own research. Gemology is a science and not everyone is a scientist.
Lots of interesting things you've posted have reminded me of somethings i learned in school last year: Commodotization VS branding. It was insightful to hear that DTC is trying to encourage partnerships to sell branded diamonds. The truth is that a successful and profitable business industry is characterized by value addition, such as differentiation, service, AND BRANDING. Once an industry hits 'commodity' status, profits and all return on investment figures are very low. Conversely, sales volume large. It is interesting to note that some online vendors and journalists proclaim that diamonds ARE commodities, since then the industry MUST compete on low cost. If true commodiztization occurs, then many of these vendors will not survive the 'walmart' effect. But there seems to be opposing forces to the trend of commoditization: namely, reputation, technical skills, branding, and relative difficulty for consumers to thoroughly inspect product. I think the latter makes the diamond industry very unique. All though the diamond rough may very well be supply controlled comodity, the final product involves so many technical labor, inspection, and handling, which adds on costs... and each step presents an opportunity for value addition. So far, many respectable vendors have successfuly adapted to these changes and supplies us quality diamonds at lower costs. And they are differentiating themselves through providing education and service.(if diamonds are truly a commodity, then where is the need for education and service?