Stone-cold11|1292537101|2798910 said:Cut is no good, and color is not graded face up.
LGK|1292539607|2798974 said:Totally, totally pass on it if you care about cut. It's definitely not going to get a good cut grade. That table facet is so big you could land an aircraft carrier on it. And the symmetry is... well, like most diamonds were cut 20 years ago (and plenty lower quality diamonds are today), splintery and random.
And it looks like it's lower in color than an H, to me.
Sorry!
At least the seller provided some moderately useful pics, though a straight on high res image would've been ideal, you can still see the table facet- that's the largest facet, the one on top, if you don't already know that, lol- is ginormous. I'd guess this is an older stone, maybe from the '60s/'70s, just guessing from the type of cutting.
slg47|1292540084|2798987 said:if you are looking for an ideal cut diamond I am afraid this is not it. not worth sending to GIA in my opinion
0carat|1292537590|2798915 said:Stone-cold11|1292537101|2798910 said:Cut is no good, and color is not graded face up.
Please elaborate, I don't understand.
Stone-cold11|1292540374|2798995 said:0carat|1292537590|2798915 said:Stone-cold11|1292537101|2798910 said:Cut is no good, and color is not graded face up.
Please elaborate, I don't understand.
Large Table, leakage present, you can see the skin through the stone.
Color grading is done from the side, table down, as the reflection of the stones can mess with your color sense.
I thought cut IS the number one most important factor to make the diamond sparkle.LGK|1292540803|2799008 said:In terms of real life performance? Well, that's a whole nother can 'o worms. Sure, you can decide that for a nice price, cut isn't all that important. This stone is probably very low in terms of returning rainbow/fire sparkle, you'll most likely see more white light return. How much? No way to tell, without more info.
When you are looking at the diamond, how can you tell the colour is off, what are the obvious give away signs?The color being soooooo far off from what they're saying, though, would kind of negate any kind of a deal you'd be getting though. So I'd scrap the idea and look elsewhere. It's not worth pursuing.
In terms of cut? I wouldn't buy this stone to wear, not even close. Sorry! It is way way way outside of idea/excellent proportions.
0carat|1292540687|2799004 said:Stone-cold11|1292540374|2798995 said:0carat|1292537590|2798915 said:Stone-cold11|1292537101|2798910 said:Cut is no good, and color is not graded face up.
Please elaborate, I don't understand.
Large Table, leakage present, you can see the skin through the stone.
Color grading is done from the side, table down, as the reflection of the stones can mess with your color sense.
Thanks, what's your best guess on the cut quality that this thing should have?
Leakage is bad because that it means it won't sparkle in those spots correct?
Thanks
0carat|1292537920|2798927 said:Ok update #2
Consigner wants to sell before christmas, so sending to GIA can't happen. Great
Option two, have a GIA graduate gemologist do the grading, including % & angles. I can have that done by Tuesday.
I told her straight up that while that's great, I want to know everything about the gemologist and if they are in good standing (does that even make sense)? I am thinking out loud here, I am an Accountant and if any potential client wanted to use me they can contact the society and check if I am in good standing, is there such thing for GIA gemologists?
If i was to get the specs and I am happy with them, I bought the diamond, then had it sent to the GIA lab for grading/laser and it's off (significantly) can I hold the GIA graduate appraiser accountable? I understand it could be off a little bit as this is a science in a way, but if I was basically lied to just to buy it can I have recourse?
Thanks.
0carat|1292541442|2799020 said:I thought cut IS the number one most important factor to make the diamond sparkle.LGK|1292540803|2799008 said:In terms of real life performance? Well, that's a whole nother can 'o worms. Sure, you can decide that for a nice price, cut isn't all that important. This stone is probably very low in terms of returning rainbow/fire sparkle, you'll most likely see more white light return. How much? No way to tell, without more info.
When you say it's low in terms of returning rainbow/fire sparkle, I am assuming that's a bad thing. Sorry I am not sure what it's supposed to return. WHite light is bad then?
No white is good too. You want a balance and some types of cuts will excel at fire and some at white light return, and being skewed to one or the other can be desirable to come people. But really, we cannot judge any of this from a photo. Neither can you. That is why you need an independent appraiser to see the stone in person
When you are looking at the diamond, how can you tell the colour is off, what are the obvious give away signs?The color being soooooo far off from what they're saying, though, would kind of negate any kind of a deal you'd be getting though. So I'd scrap the idea and look elsewhere. It's not worth pursuing.
You really cannot judge color from a photo as lighting matters a lot. The stone does look more tinted that I would expect of an H, but that could just be its poor cut. Less light being returned means the diamond will look more "tinted", and it could be the leakage as the stone is picking up the color of the skin. As to how we know, well spend tonnes of time here, buy and own many different diamonds of different color, and you too can become familiar with diamond color
In terms of cut? I wouldn't buy this stone to wear, not even close. Sorry! It is way way way outside of idea/excellent proportions.
If it's not ideal/excellent, where would it stack up in its current state. What do you think is a fair price for something like this.
I am not set on buying it, but you did mention real life performance and I think that's what I am most most concerned with. If we keep it strictly numerical, this rock is realistically half the price of what an excellent cut 1.17carat is on BN or WF.
This rock vs. excellent rock is 100% more money, is the performance of the excellent rock also twice as good? If it's not, how much better is it. I know this is a very layman approach to this, but again I am trying to keep this logical. I am not going to walk around showing off the specs of my GIA report right, it's the stone's performance in real life that matters the most to me.
0carat|1292555031|2799229 said:Well I've made up my mind.
I guess the problem is that I really can't beat the system, I am used to buying parts/modifications for my cars and motorcycle and sometimes deals come along. Unfortunately even if deals do come along I have no idea what to look for and I don't have the patience either. I've decided to skip out on this as I will have a hard time living with a piss poor cut diamond. I am going to buy from James Allen and sleep better at night.
Thanks to everyone for setting me straight
slg47|1292559878|2799298 said:that one looks great you may see some tint to the J color but I am betting you will be overwhelmed by the sparkle
LGK|1292539607|2798974 said:Totally, totally pass on it if you care about cut. It's definitely not going to get a good cut grade. That table facet is so big you could land an aircraft carrier on it. And the symmetry is... well, like most diamonds were cut 20 years ago (and plenty lower quality diamonds are today), splintery and random.
And it looks like it's lower in color than an H, to me. Significantly lower. Like at least a J, possibly K or more. It shouldn't be that much obviously more tinted compared to a D face up (and good lord, who even knows if that other diamond is truly a D, either?) Face up a true H and a true D are going to be very, very hard to see much difference in the sort of pic they sent. In this case, you can see a very large, very visible difference in color... and that only really starts showing face up, in pictures, when a diamond is *quite* low in color, generally speaking.
Sorry!
At least the seller provided some moderately useful pics, though a straight on high res image would've been ideal, you can still see the table facet- that's the largest facet, the one on top, if you don't already know that, lol- is ginormous. I'd guess this is an older stone, maybe from the '60s/'70s, just guessing from the type of cutting.
0carat|1292564153|2799329 said:From the reading I did, apparently the colour difference should be hard to distinguish, but again it's something that I will have to decide once I get the diamond.
Aside from that, I'd like to thank everyone for their input, you basically saved me from getting ripped off. If you are ever in Toronto, let me know, I owe some people beers.