- Joined
- Aug 5, 2010
- Messages
- 12,874
Re: Color blind and bad eyesight need help buying sapphire,
I know this is a lot, but here's what I think and I tried to give you something to go on for each one so you know what to ask them.
I would consider the following 5 stones:
Row 3, Column 3, weight 1.32 (ask about uniformity of color to make sure it does not have zoning)
Row 12, Column 2, weight 1.71 (love the saturation, but ask about extinction and light performance as it may very well be darker in hand with the shadowing common with ovals)
Row 2, Column 2, weight 1.81 (it is not precision cut so ask about light performance and whether the photos are accurate for tone)
Row 10, Column 1, weight 1.86 (ask about the shadowing/extinction issues that happen with oval shapes - you'll find several threads on the issue if you search it here - where the optical properties of the cutting causes one half of the oval to appear lighter than the other half; if you don't mind that, then this would be a good candidate, though could be higher saturation)
Row 15, Column 2, weight 2.40 (did not like the closeup, but love the hand shot, good tone, appears from the hand shot to have good saturation, but I would ask to make sure the hand shot is representative for saturation).
I would not consider the following 12 stones:
Row 4, Column 1, weight 1.30 (extinction issues and too dark)
Row 7, Column 1, weight 1.41 (looks like it might be too dark in hand)
Row 6, Column 3, weight 1.53 (like the tone, but lacking saturation)
Row 15, Column 3, weight 1.54 (like the tone, lacking saturation, and looks glassy)
Row 7, Column 3, weight 1.57 (too dark, lacking saturation, extinction issues)
Row 16, Column 1, weight 1.60 (good tone, but lacking saturation and maybe extinction issues)
Row 26, Column 2, weight 1.88 (loved this in the closeup; disliked it on the hand. I believe it has extinction issues, but you might ask)
I hope this helps.
![Praise :praise: :praise:](/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/16.gif)
I know this is a lot, but here's what I think and I tried to give you something to go on for each one so you know what to ask them.
I would consider the following 5 stones:
Row 3, Column 3, weight 1.32 (ask about uniformity of color to make sure it does not have zoning)
Row 12, Column 2, weight 1.71 (love the saturation, but ask about extinction and light performance as it may very well be darker in hand with the shadowing common with ovals)
Row 2, Column 2, weight 1.81 (it is not precision cut so ask about light performance and whether the photos are accurate for tone)
Row 10, Column 1, weight 1.86 (ask about the shadowing/extinction issues that happen with oval shapes - you'll find several threads on the issue if you search it here - where the optical properties of the cutting causes one half of the oval to appear lighter than the other half; if you don't mind that, then this would be a good candidate, though could be higher saturation)
Row 15, Column 2, weight 2.40 (did not like the closeup, but love the hand shot, good tone, appears from the hand shot to have good saturation, but I would ask to make sure the hand shot is representative for saturation).
I would not consider the following 12 stones:
Row 4, Column 1, weight 1.30 (extinction issues and too dark)
Row 7, Column 1, weight 1.41 (looks like it might be too dark in hand)
Row 6, Column 3, weight 1.53 (like the tone, but lacking saturation)
Row 15, Column 3, weight 1.54 (like the tone, lacking saturation, and looks glassy)
Row 7, Column 3, weight 1.57 (too dark, lacking saturation, extinction issues)
Row 16, Column 1, weight 1.60 (good tone, but lacking saturation and maybe extinction issues)
Row 26, Column 2, weight 1.88 (loved this in the closeup; disliked it on the hand. I believe it has extinction issues, but you might ask)
I hope this helps.
![Praise :praise: :praise:](/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/16.gif)