munchee
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 617
edit: I realized my post make this thread to 2nd page, in the previous page OP uploaded new video, you might want to check it.
OP, usually with HCA 2.2 the diamond is good. The problem here is not the diamond but the overpriced costs that you’re paying. Let me give you an example:
I bought a 2ct G VS2 from virtual vendor (like BE), the HCA is good (like the one you’re buying). I paid $14300. This purchase can be justified, because a diamond with same specs in super ideal vendors will cost more than $25,000. So getting a somewhat good/excellent diamond with $14,300 is OK.
but your case is different, the diamond that you’re getting maybe good, its not bad, with a price tag of $22,000. But you can get better quality diamond with $17,000. So doesn’t matter how many videos you’re getting from them, how good the diamond is, IMHO I can’t justify why I pay $22000 for 1.54 F with diameter 7.31x7.37 while I can get 1.65 F with diameter 7.57x7.58 with $1000 less.Thats 0.16mm difference in diameter for less cost!
OP, usually with HCA 2.2 the diamond is good. The problem here is not the diamond but the overpriced costs that you’re paying. Let me give you an example:
I bought a 2ct G VS2 from virtual vendor (like BE), the HCA is good (like the one you’re buying). I paid $14300. This purchase can be justified, because a diamond with same specs in super ideal vendors will cost more than $25,000. So getting a somewhat good/excellent diamond with $14,300 is OK.
but your case is different, the diamond that you’re getting maybe good, its not bad, with a price tag of $22,000. But you can get better quality diamond with $17,000. So doesn’t matter how many videos you’re getting from them, how good the diamond is, IMHO I can’t justify why I pay $22000 for 1.54 F with diameter 7.31x7.37 while I can get 1.65 F with diameter 7.57x7.58 with $1000 less.Thats 0.16mm difference in diameter for less cost!
Last edited: