- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 8,087
Gwendolyn - thanks.
We have an interesting history, to say the least ... when I met the hubs, we were both dating other people, and he was doing the LD thing with two weeks in CA, and two weeks in NY. We really hit it off, and were best friends for two years until we both would up single at the same time and thought, hey, why not? So then we got to do the LD thing as romantic partners rather than friends (makes it much harder, unsurprisingly!) for 6 months, until I got a job out in CA. We figured our problems were solved for the short-term, though we worried about the long term (we''re both academics, and while my spot out here is TT, his wasn''t). So, he went on the market this, looking for a little more permanency ... and one of the companies he interviewed with LOVED him. The only thing was, their LA office wasn''t hiring this year ....
But their Houston office was, and the opportunity was just too good to pass up. So, for the indefinite future, we''re doing the LD thing: he''ll fly home on weekends, and once in a while when my workload isn''t too bad, I''ll return the favor. And, once he''s gained some experience in this field, he''ll have the option of transferring back to LA (or, alternately, once I''ve established myself a little more firmly in my field, I suppose I''ll have the option of seeking employment elsewhere ... though, this one is pretty firmly in 2nd place for me, since I love my university). We''ll make it work, one way or another.
And, *Lindsey,* thank you - couldn''t have said it better myself on "Is it a pain? Yes. Is there a reason for it? Yes. Should companies come up with a way to accommodate families in which members have different names? Yes!" Yes, indeed! The thing that irks me about this, specifically - and I''d say it is a case of individual discrimination on the part of the agent, though not company-wide discrimination as policy - is that the system basically operates on trust. They have no way of verifying identity over the phone: if I had said I was his wife with no additional info., or lied about my name, or, heck, said, yes, I''m the recipient, my parents gave me a male family name, hahaha, isn''t it *funny,* it would have gone over just fine. It''s the kind of a system that will only bite honest people or complete idiots. If they really want to be safe, they should use a specific identifier, like, say ... their tracking number. And, yes, definitely calling to follow through on this!
We have an interesting history, to say the least ... when I met the hubs, we were both dating other people, and he was doing the LD thing with two weeks in CA, and two weeks in NY. We really hit it off, and were best friends for two years until we both would up single at the same time and thought, hey, why not? So then we got to do the LD thing as romantic partners rather than friends (makes it much harder, unsurprisingly!) for 6 months, until I got a job out in CA. We figured our problems were solved for the short-term, though we worried about the long term (we''re both academics, and while my spot out here is TT, his wasn''t). So, he went on the market this, looking for a little more permanency ... and one of the companies he interviewed with LOVED him. The only thing was, their LA office wasn''t hiring this year ....
But their Houston office was, and the opportunity was just too good to pass up. So, for the indefinite future, we''re doing the LD thing: he''ll fly home on weekends, and once in a while when my workload isn''t too bad, I''ll return the favor. And, once he''s gained some experience in this field, he''ll have the option of transferring back to LA (or, alternately, once I''ve established myself a little more firmly in my field, I suppose I''ll have the option of seeking employment elsewhere ... though, this one is pretty firmly in 2nd place for me, since I love my university). We''ll make it work, one way or another.
And, *Lindsey,* thank you - couldn''t have said it better myself on "Is it a pain? Yes. Is there a reason for it? Yes. Should companies come up with a way to accommodate families in which members have different names? Yes!" Yes, indeed! The thing that irks me about this, specifically - and I''d say it is a case of individual discrimination on the part of the agent, though not company-wide discrimination as policy - is that the system basically operates on trust. They have no way of verifying identity over the phone: if I had said I was his wife with no additional info., or lied about my name, or, heck, said, yes, I''m the recipient, my parents gave me a male family name, hahaha, isn''t it *funny,* it would have gone over just fine. It''s the kind of a system that will only bite honest people or complete idiots. If they really want to be safe, they should use a specific identifier, like, say ... their tracking number. And, yes, definitely calling to follow through on this!