Firstly, I agree that that kind of thinking can put many people in a tough spot, for SURE. (Now that I'm aware of what weddings cost, I'm one of those tough-spot dwellers.)Date: 12/13/2007 1:46:38 AM
Author: swingirl
Whoa! With weddings getting so lavish at $100-$200 a plate it makes the guest start to consider whether they should go at all if the plate is so expensive.
However, I really have to say that I don't think $100-$200/plate can be safely described as "lavish." One of the big selling points of our venue was that it was one of THE LEAST expensive I found, and it still averages out to $120/plate. This place is beautiful, sure, but hardly the Four Seasons.
The flip side of your coin is that... with "plates" costing $120/each, it makes us start to consider whether I should invite so-and-so at all. It's sad, but with a tight budget, often it comes down to "is it worth paying an extra $120 to have this person here?" This is a question we often ask when parents/etc. are pressuring us to invite any given person. Their defense is usually "Well, you'll probably get that much and more back in gifts."
Crass, I know. And then I feel disgusting for even falling into this line of reasoning. People should be invited to my wedding based upon whether I want them to be there--not whether I think their presence is valued at $120.
I'm another who'd never heard of this until my FMIL, who is from New Jersey, brought it up in defense of her guest list add-ons.
P.S. FI and I did learn our lesson, and now question add-ons only based on how well we know them--and stopped giving cost as an excuse.