- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 17,459
I want to see......was where''s the link? It wasn''t who I think it was was it? I thought her ring looked really unique, and not like standard mall replicas.....NAME THAT SUSPECT!Date: 2/17/2006 2:12:09 PM
Author: Shawna13
I don''t know.... this is the Show me the Ring forum. If there was a ring... it would be shown. And just to prove all us ''nasty ladies'' wrong... I''m sure he''d be posting a pic of the rock for us. Come on now.... what man doesn''t want to hear a woman say ''I was wrong''??!!! hahaha
There was a PSer who posted her engagement ring (1.98ct, E, VVS1 or something) in a collage of black and white pictures. Who takes black and white pictures of such a ring?? It looked strangely exactly like my $10 replica from the mall... exactly! I called her on this, and strangely enough she hasn''t posted anything since.
You can be proud of your jewellery.. be it a 0.05 center stone diamond solitaire, to a 5ct center diamond, to a beautiful setting with a sparkly CZ in it.... it''s all beautiful cause it means something to you. Maybe some people feel the need to exaggerate if they''re posting on this site to ''look good''. Who knows!
LOL....Alj wrong???Date: 2/17/2006 2:49:51 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''ll flat out confess I don''t believe the reason we aren''t seeing pictures is because we hurt his feeling. I don''t believe we were gonna see pictures period, and you know why. However, I''d love to be proven wrong, and I''ll be more than happy to join the believers if and when I see something that trumps my otherwise sound instincts.
I''d rather be skeptical than gullible.
DF, I''ve decided I need you to be my campaign manager. You know how to give great press! LOLDate: 2/17/2006 8:20:09 PM
Author: Dancing Fire
LOL....Alj wrong???Date: 2/17/2006 2:49:51 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''ll flat out confess I don''t believe the reason we aren''t seeing pictures is because we hurt his feeling. I don''t believe we were gonna see pictures period, and you know why. However, I''d love to be proven wrong, and I''ll be more than happy to join the believers if and when I see something that trumps my otherwise sound instincts.
I''d rather be skeptical than gullible.that would be against the ''basic rules''. it''s written on ''the bill of RIGHTS'' it said...Alj is never WRONG.
AljDate: 2/17/2006 8:59:29 PM
Author: aljdewey
DF, I''ve decided I need you to be my campaign manager. You know how to give great press! LOLDate: 2/17/2006 8:20:09 PM
Author: Dancing Fire
LOL....Alj wrong???Date: 2/17/2006 2:49:51 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''ll flat out confess I don''t believe the reason we aren''t seeing pictures is because we hurt his feeling. I don''t believe we were gonna see pictures period, and you know why. However, I''d love to be proven wrong, and I''ll be more than happy to join the believers if and when I see something that trumps my otherwise sound instincts.
I''d rather be skeptical than gullible.that would be against the ''basic rules''. it''s written on ''the bill of RIGHTS'' it said...Alj is never WRONG.
I remember that Al must have been having a bad day. She can argue her point like no one else and I love that. Al for President!!!Date: 2/17/2006 9:36:51 PM
Author: Dancing Fire
AljDate: 2/17/2006 8:59:29 PM
Author: aljdewey
DF, I''ve decided I need you to be my campaign manager. You know how to give great press! LOLDate: 2/17/2006 8:20:09 PM
Author: Dancing Fire
LOL....Alj wrong???Date: 2/17/2006 2:49:51 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''ll flat out confess I don''t believe the reason we aren''t seeing pictures is because we hurt his feeling. I don''t believe we were gonna see pictures period, and you know why. However, I''d love to be proven wrong, and I''ll be more than happy to join the believers if and when I see something that trumps my otherwise sound instincts.
I''d rather be skeptical than gullible.that would be against the ''basic rules''. it''s written on ''the bill of RIGHTS'' it said...Alj is never WRONG.
believe me,if John Kerry learn to debate like you,he would of been our president.nobody beats Alj when it comes to a debate.well.....except David. he got lucky and caught you on a off day.
Date: 2/17/2006 6:12:11 PM
Author: Dancing Fire
it took you this long to realize it ain't gonna happen?Date: 2/17/2006 3:34:40 AM
Author: Kaleidoscopic
Hey guys I hate to dissapoint you, but I am starting to doubt that there will be pics of this Lucida in our near future.
I know mb was pretty upset when he wrote to me after all the posts on this forum. I told him to understand some of the PS member's skepticism, especially since there was some deceptive pictures that were posted (including the fake 5ct EC ring). Anyway, that was the last I herd form him.
tough questionDate: 2/19/2006 1:05:43 AM
Author: Kaleidoscopic
Date: 2/17/2006 6:12:11 PM
Author: Dancing Fire
it took you this long to realize it ain''t gonna happen?Date: 2/17/2006 3:34:40 AM
Author: Kaleidoscopic
Hey guys I hate to dissapoint you, but I am starting to doubt that there will be pics of this Lucida in our near future.
I know mb was pretty upset when he wrote to me after all the posts on this forum. I told him to understand some of the PS member''s skepticism, especially since there was some deceptive pictures that were posted (including the fake 5ct EC ring). Anyway, that was the last I herd form him.
Hey Dancing Fire, don''t mistake my politeness for being naive!
I don''t think anyone on here intended to be rude, but you did say in your first post that you had a tight budget of $2500-$3000. To buy a 2+ carat Lucida you need a lot more money than that, and we all know that. Unless you hit the lottery or something of that nature, how could your budget jump up that much? That''s what we''re all wondering. Furthermore, you posted in the Show Me the Ring forum and didn''t post any pictures. That further makes all of us think that you didn''t actually buy this ring. This isn''t intended to be a personal attack on you at all, just questions for you.Date: 2/28/2006 3:07:47 AM
Author: mb
I am quite appalled by some of the responses of the forum members. For not knowing a person''s financial background, some of you are pretty darn quick to form such rash conclusions.
I think the issue is that the budget jump was so enormous. I can see going from a $3,000 budget to a $10,000 budget, but to jump up to a $50,000 budget seems unbelieveable. Certainly there are some people with wealth out there, but not that many people even on here are spending $50,000 on an engagement ring.Date: 2/28/2006 7:18:57 AM
Author: valeria101
... and clearly, no one around these parts can conceive that any guy or girl might possibly want to spend less than (at least) the maximum they afford on a diamond!
Date: 2/28/2006 8:49:56 AM
Author: midgirl
pictures PLEASE.
2.2 Tiffany''s? Gotta see it to believe it.
Date: 2/28/2006 3:07:47 AM
Author: mb
I am quite appalled by some of the responses of the forum members. For not knowing a person''s financial background, some of you are pretty darn quick to form such rash conclusions.
Yes MaraDate: 2/28/2006 12:16:17 PM
Author: Mara
okay I don''t wanna see this thread bumped again WITHOUT PICTURES!!! do ya''ll hear me?!!??!
hey my brit gfDate: 2/28/2006 2:09:07 PM
Author: Lorelei
Yes MaraDate: 2/28/2006 12:16:17 PM
Author: Mara
okay I don''t wanna see this thread bumped again WITHOUT PICTURES!!! do ya''ll hear me?!!??!