- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 11,676
Laila619|1374516862|3487796 said:She had really bad morning sickness, so that's another reason why I'm pretty sure it's a girl. Of course it's just an old wives' tale, but supposedly girls cause terrible morning sickness much more often than boys.
justginger|1374517892|3487811 said:Laila619|1374516862|3487796 said:She had really bad morning sickness, so that's another reason why I'm pretty sure it's a girl. Of course it's just an old wives' tale, but supposedly girls cause terrible morning sickness much more often than boys.
Of everyone I know who has had absolutely wretched first trimester sickness (one to the point of throwing up at work until she had to duck into ED for fluids!), every single one had a girl. I am sure there are counter examples, but within my friends/family, the old wives' tale holds true.
Smith1942|1374512943|3487756 said:madelise|1374512326|3487750 said:I love the royalty. Wish we had an official royal family for the US. I've never heard anyone else say they don't like the idea of a royal family..
I hope they give her a middle name of Diana
I liked Diana, she was so un-stuffy and really made an effort to introduce her sons to normal life. I've heard other people say that they wish the baby had the middle name of Diana, for a girl. However, I don't think the royals would allow that. The royal family needs positive PR, and think how embarrassing it would be for Charles and Camilla if the baby's middle name was Diana. And they are senior to Kate and William, being the next King and Queen. It's important for the royals that a positive image is maintained, so I don't think they would allow Diana to be a part of the name, seeing as the whole episode was so embarrassing and then tragic.
Feb03Bride|1374518519|3487821 said:Smith1942|1374512943|3487756 said:madelise|1374512326|3487750 said:I love the royalty. Wish we had an official royal family for the US. I've never heard anyone else say they don't like the idea of a royal family..
I hope they give her a middle name of Diana
I liked Diana, she was so un-stuffy and really made an effort to introduce her sons to normal life. I've heard other people say that they wish the baby had the middle name of Diana, for a girl. However, I don't think the royals would allow that. The royal family needs positive PR, and think how embarrassing it would be for Charles and Camilla if the baby's middle name was Diana. And they are senior to Kate and William, being the next King and Queen. It's important for the royals that a positive image is maintained, so I don't think they would allow Diana to be a part of the name, seeing as the whole episode was so embarrassing and then tragic.
But Diana was William's mother so PR be damned, if he wants his future daughter to have the middle name be Diana, it shouldn't be a matter of if being "allowed". Their child, their choice, royalty be damned.
rosetta|1374516303|3487788 said:Why do I suspect it's so no one will photograph her looking even the slightest bit fatter than a stick insect?
Chrono|1374518392|3487819 said:Old wives' tales. I personally know at least 2 or 3 people who were admitted to the ER for horrible MS and had boys.
Smith1942|1374521175|3487855 said:rosetta|1374516303|3487788 said:Why do I suspect it's so no one will photograph her looking even the slightest bit fatter than a stick insect?
Oh, no! Surely no-one could be that vain?? I go a bit stir-crazy if I stay inside for a couple of days, let alone six whole weeks!
rosetta|1374521762|3487864 said:Smith1942|1374521175|3487855 said:rosetta|1374516303|3487788 said:Why do I suspect it's so no one will photograph her looking even the slightest bit fatter than a stick insect?
Oh, no! Surely no-one could be that vain?? I go a bit stir-crazy if I stay inside for a couple of days, let alone six whole weeks!
Oh, I'm sure she can. She is constantly photographed as looking flawless and royals carefully control which photographs get in the press. But still, the only way to have complete control is to not go out at all.
rosetta|1374521843|3487867 said:So much for the morning sickness theory!
Feb03Bride|1374521865|3487868 said:rosetta|1374521762|3487864 said:Smith1942|1374521175|3487855 said:rosetta|1374516303|3487788 said:Why do I suspect it's so no one will photograph her looking even the slightest bit fatter than a stick insect?
Oh, no! Surely no-one could be that vain?? I go a bit stir-crazy if I stay inside for a couple of days, let alone six whole weeks!
Oh, I'm sure she can. She is constantly photographed as looking flawless and royals carefully control which photographs get in the press. But still, the only way to have complete control is to not go out at all.
Kim Kardashian, the biggest fame wh*re of all, hasn't been seen since she gave birth to North. If she can do it, anyone can.
It must be great having all those riches when marrying into the royal family, but you do have to sell your soul a bit.
Laila619|1374516862|3487796 said:She had really bad morning sickness, so that's another reason why I'm pretty sure it's a girl. Of course it's just an old wives' tale, but supposedly girls cause terrible morning sickness much more often than boys.
Amber St. Clare|1374592806|3488489 said:Laila619|1374516862|3487796 said:She had really bad morning sickness, so that's another reason why I'm pretty sure it's a girl. Of course it's just an old wives' tale, but supposedly girls cause terrible morning sickness much more often than boys.
I had morning sickness for 7 months and produced a bouncing baby boy.